It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
Which is probably been their plan all along. The central banks and governments knew they couldn’t continue to delay the crucial adjustment processes of a deflationary phase. So what they needed was an escape goat, someone they could put all the blame on and who better than Russia.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
I’m afraid you don’t if you don’t understand their are way more metrics involved besides supply and demand.
originally posted by: mcsnacks77
Do you ever read up on anything you run your mouth about or is it strictly using talking points as seen on Tv?
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: mcsnacks77
Gas is only 6% of Finnish energy, Italy is probably worse off. But yeah, it'll still be expensive to cut off. Sounds like a good plan anyway. But it remains to be seen if Russia is willing to stop selling, they need money too.
originally posted by: vNex92
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: mcsnacks77
Gas is only 6% of Finnish energy, Italy is probably worse off. But yeah, it'll still be expensive to cut off. Sounds like a good plan anyway. But it remains to be seen if Russia is willing to stop selling, they need money too.
China is with Russia the media doesn't seem to think that.
The same media didn't thought that the Russians would intervene in Syria either.
originally posted by: vNex92
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: mcsnacks77
Gas is only 6% of Finnish energy, Italy is probably worse off. But yeah, it'll still be expensive to cut off. Sounds like a good plan anyway. But it remains to be seen if Russia is willing to stop selling, they need money too.
China is with Russia the media doesn't seem to think that.
The same media didn't thought that the Russians would intervene in Syria either.