Pfizer’s Confidential Document Media's Reaction

The Mainstream News Media is still backing Pfizer despite the confidential documents that are still likely going to be released.
Its being a week after the Pfizer documents.

The Media is slowly adjusting to the news of the Pfizer confidential documents release after the FDA had lost the court.
Some some news media had been pushing the vaccine agaisnt omicron despite the documents release.

Recently Obama had praised the covid vaccine for his supposed infection and still urged people to get their covid shots despite the documents release.

Some outlets had claimed that "doesn’t demonstrate that the vaccine caused the events or is unsafe"
despite the fact that Pfizer tried to that data for 55 years.

Pfizer’s confidential document shows adverse events reported following vaccination; it doesn’t demonstrate that the vaccine caused the events or is unsafe

The Media is still defending Pfizer with the narrative they had been running. Why wont the media accpet that healthy people who gotten a vaccine are likely to have a adverse reaction despite having no health issues before?

Pfizer's document released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration contains information about adverse events that occurred following vaccination. Adverse events are health problems that occur after vaccination but aren’t necessarily caused by the vaccine. Therefore, these reports don’t establish a causal relationship between the events and the vaccine. These reports alone thus are insufficient to demonstrate that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine caused any new side effects or is unsafe.

Here are some more how they are trying to sway the debate away from the adverse reactions despite the data release.

Huge study finds most COVID-19 vaccine side effects were mild for Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna
Wha t is an 'adverse event?' Inside the recently released report on Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine


The media had been using experts to push the vaccines for many months while ignoring those who likely had even reported that they have adverse reactions following their vaccinations.

Its not uncommon that now some experts on TV are still pushing it as much as Obama.

Mainstream News Media hasn't still reported stories of those women who had reported heavy periods following their second doses of their vaccination.

a reply to: vNex92

The graphene oxide seems to be a major problem with the nervous system, I would suggest that since the heart is a massive bundle of nerves and muscle, this will be the main area of concern.

Or women who had those symptoms from coming into close contact with people who had been vaccinated.

a reply to: vNex92

Why not go with what Bourla now says, like Walensky and Fauci, as well as Gates, they're trying to weasel their way out of any litigation and repercussions - too late, the little fascists.

Bourla wants us to believe that he didn't want to use MRNA shots and that it was his teams idea, totally nothing to do with him, he's just "following TeH ScIeNze".....

These people are top kek evil. The problem is most people don't conceive evil for what it is, its a living thing and it has a reason to spread.......

a reply to: vNex92

Any person who still buys into the official narrative, who does not understand the shots are dangerous to all and fatal to many, is demonstrating what the lawyers call "willful ignorance".

Or they're scared witless, just like they were when they all rushed out to get an untested gene therapy to protect them from the flu - sold to them by a technocrat who makes a living on suffering and medicine......reply to: Salander

a reply to: vNex92

JP Sears has something to say about the released docs -

Media thinks that is all the data release yet i had seen that only 9 pages or close to it had been released so far.
Its not over yet with the data batch release.