Is 57.9% Efficacy Against Symptoms Really A Stunning Success?

originally posted by: 1947boomer
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

100% success against death from covid is about as stunning as you can get.

What is stunning ?
The sheer amount of ignorant folks that believe those numbers .

a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Just curious why you think 100% protection against severe illness or death is bad?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Just curious why you think 100% protection against severe illness or death is bad?

I don't think 100% protection from illness or death is necessarily bad.

I just don't believe any vaccine, medication, or treatment, can honestly make that claim.

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Just curious why you think 100% protection against severe illness or death is bad?

I don't think 100% protection from illness or death is necessarily bad.

I just don't believe any vaccine, medication, or treatment, can honestly make that claim.

Okay, but that's the number you posted and said was bad .... if you think the number is wrong I am willing to look at your data, until then I'll stick with your numbers.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Just curious why you think 100% protection against severe illness or death is bad?

I don't think 100% protection from illness or death is necessarily bad.

I just don't believe any vaccine, medication, or treatment, can honestly make that claim.

Okay, but that's the number you posted and said was bad .... if you think the number is wrong I am willing to look at your data, until then I'll stick with your numbers.

They are not my numbers. I didn't rate any thing as bad. I said I don't trust their numbers or how they analysed their data.

I asked a question. You are free to stick with whatever you choose, but those numbers are theirs, not mine.