a reply to:
Terpene
Job and phone number? I tell him he has no right to ask me that for a minor infringement. Now he realises that I know my rights too.
Why are you confusing your rights with his?
Everyone has the right to ask any question they want. It's their mouth, they can form any utterances they darn well please.
What you should've realized is that you have no OBLIGATION TO OBEY someone that has no authority over you, and if peace has not been breached, and you
have not answered 'yes' to his legalese (not english) question about 'understanding' (meaning 'standing under his/her authority'), the authority has
not been created.
But be careful, they have PLENTY of tricks to create that authority.
However, talking like you did creates dishonor, no matter how proud you were of your supposed 'victory'. Things are not as simple as you seem to
think, so be careful, or you end up digging a hole or jail for yourself while thinking 'you know your rights'. Can you list all of your rights, by the
way?
No?
Then do you REALLY know your rights?
No one can truly KNOW their rights, as there are too many to ever list. You should rather know your OBLIGATIONS, where authority comes from and why
and how it is created, you should know the LIMITS of goverments' powers, and so on.
Constitutions or any other pieces of paper never create any rights, I hope everyone knows that by now. They only LIMIT governments' powers so they
can't prevent you from using your rights or trample on them.
However, they're sneaky and tricky, so they have succeeded in removing almost everyone's access to their unalienable rights, by using one right
against you - your right to unlimited contracting. You can sign a contract which prevents you from USING your rights - and indeed, millions of people
already have. You can give your consent to not using your rights, so it's game over.
At this kind of situation, it doesn't matter what you think you know about your rights, when you have already consented to not using them.
Also, talking about rights is a losing proposition in a court; the policy enforcers can talk about duties, and those trump rights.
It's sad that so many people seem to think that just by waving the word 'right' or 'rights' in front of someone's nose will somehow trump anything
that someone says or does. It's going to be a bitter wake-up call when you look at the bricks through the bars and wonder how the heck it all
happened, after all, you said the magic word, 'rights'.
(It's like trying to win in Monopoly by just reading the rule book instead of actually PLAYING THE GAME.)
edit on 9-2-2022 by Shoujikina
because: (no reason given)