Mexico no longer including ivermectin in home COVID-19 kits, contrary to claims on social media

Looks like Pfizer likely is pushing their version of viral pills to Mexico. Mexican government is no longer distributing ivermectin to its citizens in home COVID-19 care kits for ambulatory patients.

Pro Pfizer reuters is claiming that Mexican government is no longer distributing ivermectin to its citizens in home COVID-19 care kits for ambulatory patients.

No benefits of ivermectin? says mexcian govt. Yet Joe Rogan used it and was fine.

On Jan. 28, 2021, a panel of public health institutions in Mexico ( (link tracking not allowed)/3KLS8xK ), concluded there was no evidence on the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID-19, either by itself or combined with azithromycin

a reply to: vNex92

On Jan. 28, 2021, a panel of public health institutions in Mexico ( (link tracking not allowed)/3KLS8xK ), concluded there was no evidence on the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID-19, either by itself or combined with azithromycin

"On Jan. 28, 2021, a panel of public health institutions in Mexico , after receiving a large bank deposit , ( (link tracking not allowed)/3KLS8xK ), concluded there was no evidence on the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID-19, either by itself or combined with azithromycin "

a reply to: vNex92

All I hear from the naysayers in the media are that "Well the trials have been small sized" or "Trial not good enough" etc. etc. etc.

Nobody says it doesn't work just that there is not enough evidence for trials they won't do. There is a hell of a lot more evidence for Ivermectin having positive effect than their high cost remdesivir but you don't see any problem getting that crap authorized.

Here is an example: PolitiFact has fact-checked several claims concerning ivermectin and its efficacy against COVID-19. We’ve found that some studies suggest the drug can help treat COVID-19, while other studies show no tangible effect. Many of the studies had small sample sizes and other methodological limitations.


American Journal of Therapeutics
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...


Effectiveness of a multidrug therapy consisting of Ivermectin, Azithromycin, Montelukast, and Acetylsalicylic acid to prevent hospitalization and death among ambulatory COVID-19 cases in Tlaxcala, Mexico

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Results: Nearly 85% of cases who received the TNR4 recovered within 14 days compared to 59% in the comparison group. The likelihood of recovery within 14 days was 3.4 times greater among the TNR4 group than in the comparison group. Patients treated with TNR4 had a 75% and 81% lower risk of being hospitalized or death, respectively, than the comparison group.

Conclusions: TNR4 therapy improved recovery and prevented the risk of hospitalization and death among ambulatory COVID-19 cases.

a reply to: vNex92

Truth is, Ivermectin didn't have a chance from the beginning well before they did any trials. The stage was set early on to ban this, and any drug that could proof to be effective.
This is how pharma got it's emergency use authorization.... no competition allowed, which should tell you something about ivermectin's efficacy.

How do we prove they are or aren't ? 🤓

the most populated city on the planet, in india, got their death rate down to essentially 0.0% using ivermectin.

meanwhile, in the richest country in the world, people are buying it at farm supply shops because the government doesn't want us having it.

It seems the Mexican government serves the same masters that the Canadian and US governments do....

originally posted by: Salander
It seems the Mexican government serves the same masters that the Canadian and US governments do....

We live in Mexico. Up to now, there have been no mandates and things are pretty relaxed. We're stocking up on IVM, purchasing OTC.

I hope they hold the line here.