It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: marg6043
They are not cures for Covid. Nor do they prevent Covid.
However, they "may" help alleviate severe symptoms in some patients. Though this is disputed.
Wow thanks for proving the jabs do not cure covid and lately you will die still from covid after been jabbed and boosted.
cure
a means of healing or restoring to health; remedy.
a method or course of remedial treatment, as for disease.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: chr0naut
How the medica lied about japan no using invermectin
www.brightworkresearch.com...
Interesting information.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
There is a definite and real campaign to hype Ivermectin and HQC. They outright lie about their effectiveness.
Japan never officially approved Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19. Similarly, as far as I have been able to determine, there were no increases in sales of Ivermectin in Japan, neither human nor veterinary, which one might expect to be obvious if tens of millions of people were taking it. So the claims that it was the reason for a reduction of COVID-19 cases in Japan is just bogus.
Japan is not using ivermectin instead of vaccines to treat Covid-19
Japan Continues to Use Vaccines, Not Ivermectin, to Fight COVID-19
Similarly, the claims about Uttar Pradesh seem to be negated by the fact that a few months later, India removed Ivermectin from its list of medicines for use against COVID-19 because it was proven to be ineffective.
No new COVID-19 cases in Uttar Pradesh, India, due to use of ivermectin
Why HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol
Similarly, those who promote Ivermectin as a magical cure suggest it works both as a prophylactic, and as a treatment. Yet they put down the papers that show that Ivermectin doesn't have much effect against COVID-19 (in several different human clinical trials) by suggesting that the trials were done 'at the wrong time' in the course of the COVID-19 infections, specifically to show ivermectin in a bad light. How does a drug that is supposed to work well in every situation, prove to be ineffective in most situations, and the reason was they didn't test it in exactly the right way.
In each case, different people and groups, are saying it is ineffective. The internet snake oil salesmen, the ones who previously have sold dubious supplements, dodgy 'cures', and bad health advice, are still not the people you can trust for good and truthful health advice.
Nice try, but the leak of the classified DARPA documents confirms they are cures.
Also, Japan is using ivermectin. They also dropped the vaccine mandates and slapped myocarditis warning labels on them.
source
Good try though. You can't stop the truth now. Just make sure you're not in the way of some very angry people when they realize what happened although I'd add you to the Nuremberg list if I could.
originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut
You're so yesterday. Every day. Merck's patent for Ivermectin expired in 1996. It's produced by numerous manufacturers and is about 7-cents per pill top end manufacture cost if I remember correctly.
I just got 90 12mg Ivermectin tablets from India for less than a hundred bucks. Depending on the person's weight that's still a lot of full treatments.
I also got 90 HCQ 200mg tabs. My total order including shipping was a few cents over $160.
Have you seriously looked at any of these? Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 75 studies
The sidebar on the following lists multiple possible therapeutics and the testing done on them as well.
Global ivermectin adoption for COVID-19: 37%
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: chr0naut
How do you feel knowing that the government mostly democrats, CDC, puppy killer fauci and pharma engaged in criminal behavior when they allowed thousands to die from covid because they wanted to push for money making experimental injections that now is proven to be nothing but a scam.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: chr0naut
How do you feel knowing that the government mostly democrats, CDC, puppy killer fauci and pharma engaged in criminal behavior when they allowed thousands to die from covid because they wanted to push for money making experimental injections that now is proven to be nothing but a scam.
They aren't a scam. They are working.
Despite the weekly number of cases of COVID-19 nearly doubling, the weekly deaths from COVID-19 have halved. This is in most countries of the world where vaccination is better than 50% of population.
What is a scam are the people conflating a few cases per million of adverse reactions and suggesting that millions are dying from the vaccines - suggesting that the few hundreds of instances of people who might have been taking ivermectin, have somehow turned the COVID-19 situation round for a country of 125 million people - or that a treatment unapproved across most of the world is some miracle cure, even when those countries that were trying to use it, have now officially abandoned it, too.
A lot of vaxxed people who have covid are contaminated with it, it's just trace amounts their nasal passages, it's not actually infecting them. It's like they've breathed in some soot or some other substance that isn't really effecting them.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Sources are in my signature.
To vastly over simplify things, people who are asymptomatic are contaminated, people who are symptomatic are infected.
Sometime people breath in small amounts of covid which gets trapped in their nose or their nasal passages (This is actually what nose hairs are for), the covid hangs around for a while and can be detected using a lateral flow kit. But because the virus has been trapped, or because a person has some form of immunity, they don't get sick. So they are contaminated but not infected.
There's a lot more to it, but I don't believe that giving you a more complicated answer, or blinding you with science, would change your mind.