It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you were a politician who pushed a vaccine that increased the average death rate you would do anything to hide the figures
originally posted by: nugget1
Our rural area was given a large batch of vaccines to inoculate patients in assisted living, staff and pharmacy workers. That batch would yield a lot of data for the different age groups; they could find out how strong a dose was harmful to the compromised individuals.
It's possible that different batches had varying strengths, I suppose. I have no idea what I'm talking about as far as the realm of scientific possibilities; just thinking out loud.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Wisenox
For what I have read around in the net, this batches are not a mistake in doses is all part of the experimentation in human subject agenda.
This one of the reasons why some people get horrible side effects and even death after the jab while others have not problems or just mild side effects.
Is also a reason why CDC is tracking every single person that gets the jab.
People just do not take the time to really understand what is going on.
The pharma cannot kill or make too many sick with side effects from the jab to be too obvious, plain and simple.
Could explain your post in a bit more detail?
Either a "batch" (lot) is toxic, in which case everyone receiving a dose from said batch will be adversely affected, or the dosage is being incorrectly calculated for each dose administered mm resulting in both adverse and non-adverse effects from the same batch lots.
As I stated in my response to th OP, the first possibility does not seem to be the case since I suffered no adverse side-effects from what is claimed to be one of the most "toxic" of the Moderna lots.
For the second hypothesis to be correct, it would mean that individual Healthcare providers, acting either on their own, or in concert are choosing to over, or under dose, their patients; essentially choosing, individually, who is to survive and who is to quite possibly die.
So this whole idea of "toxic batches" is either another load of "hooey"; or your doctor is deciding whether or not you deserve to live.
originally posted by: 38181
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Wisenox
For what I have read around in the net, this batches are not a mistake in doses is all part of the experimentation in human subject agenda.
This one of the reasons why some people get horrible side effects and even death after the jab while others have not problems or just mild side effects.
Is also a reason why CDC is tracking every single person that gets the jab.
People just do not take the time to really understand what is going on.
The pharma cannot kill or make too many sick with side effects from the jab to be too obvious, plain and simple.
Could explain your post in a bit more detail?
Either a "batch" (lot) is toxic, in which case everyone receiving a dose from said batch will be adversely affected, or the dosage is being incorrectly calculated for each dose administered mm resulting in both adverse and non-adverse effects from the same batch lots.
As I stated in my response to th OP, the first possibility does not seem to be the case since I suffered no adverse side-effects from what is claimed to be one of the most "toxic" of the Moderna lots.
For the second hypothesis to be correct, it would mean that individual Healthcare providers, acting either on their own, or in concert are choosing to over, or under dose, their patients; essentially choosing, individually, who is to survive and who is to quite possibly die.
So this whole idea of "toxic batches" is either another load of "hooey"; or your doctor is deciding whether or not you deserve to live.
Also the fact that they have to properly dilute each vial that comes in, I asked a doctor, he said that each little vial of Pfizer equals six properly diluted shots.
Could it be that some lazy or non informed healthcare worker didn’t dilute the shot, and gave it straight from the vial?
Okay I’ll play.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
When should I expect them, then?
I have annual check-ups, I'd like to give my doctor a heads-up on what to expect.
Pretty sure you're trolling, but it could take years. Cancer rates are astronomical already. But if something happens to you, how will you know to blame the vaccine?
I imagine it would depend on what "happens" to me.
Then again, if "it could take years" as you say, how we know not to blame the vaccine?
Are suggesting that all illness and medical conditions that develop henceforth be tied to these vaccines?
Isn't that just as baseless and irrational?
Ha! My agenda? Nice try.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: slatesteam
My vaccination record is already a part of my medical history, since I received my vaccinations through my primary care provider.
If/when, in the extremely unlikely event that a possible adverse effect should arise, calling his attention to the malady, and questioning its possible relationship to the vaccines I've received, will be his responsibility to treat appropriately, as is his duty as a health care provider, at the risk of his personal malpractice obligations.
Whether a direct linkage between the condition I present and any vaccination I might have received can be drawn will depend entirely on the mechanics of the condition I present. The same is true of all current vaccines.
I know it does not support your agenda, but, again, to simply assume/claim that, henceforth, any and all illnesses or medical conditions encountered by COVID vaccinated persons are directly the result of the vaccines themselves is irrational and most likely unsupportable; demonstrating a large degree the holder's lack of understanding with regard to the operation of the vaccine.