Antifa Urges Members To Take Up Arms After Rittenhouse Verdict

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

What did that alternative thought process look like and what were the results?

I'm not quite sure. It sounded like justice worked in the trail, but something felt off from the beginning when it happened. To me, it's not seeming like cut and dry self defense anymore. I personally thought it was self defense, but I have doubts now, like it might have been some kind of set up. That is something I hadn't given consideration to. I am becoming suspicious of what I've been hearing on conservative talk radio, something I generally agree with.

Jimmy's claims were hard for me to believe, yet it still activated my conspiracy response that something more is going on then I was being lead to believe from what I was picking up on. That makes me question my conservative news sources more than I may have before. That is the main thing those posts did for me, not make me a convert to liberal progressive mind set.

I haven't taking the dive down that rabbit hole yet to discover what it is that seems off to me now. I am a little busy, maybe later tonight I'll dig down some and try to figure out what is causing my CT senses to tingle.

a reply to: infolurker

Let them arm up all they want the ets send in the fib to make them go away for being the clowns they are.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Asking questions and entertaining new interpretations is a noble exercise that can often yield useful results. Just don't lose sight of the facts in the process.

This should put them squarely on a Terrorist Watch list.

If it doesn't, you know where the problem is. It would be time to sue Washington for every life they didn't protect.

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: infolurker

And that is when the shooting war starts.
They should be allowed to march and protest all they want per the 1st Amendment, which is every American’s right.
Burning, looting and attacking people should not be tolerated.

The only problem is, this can be used against lawful protestors, which is precisely what they did on 1/6...

Send in some agent provocateur's, then set it up to make it look like the lawful protestors started rioting... then the WRONG people get shot.

What needs to happen is the protestors themselves need to be armed to the teeth, and slap that crap down before it even gets started... make real Citizen's arrests, fully documented as to what they were doing, and sit on their retarded asses until the police come and haul their asses away.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles
It's one thing to not watch the trial and accept the verdict. That's the way it should be, always.

I disagree... vehemently.

Blind trust is how we got ourselves into this hot mess in the first place.

Trust... but verify.

I've never blindly trusted anything that anyone from any position of authority says, but I can understand how/why some people have... in the past. But not any more. Enough has happened... enough has been exposed, that anyone who continues to blindly trust anything is a damned fool.

Watch they will end up shooting each other or themselves due to lack of firearm training. Let's carry a firearm while committing crimes, that will end well for you.

a reply to: tanstaafl

What needs to happen is the protestors themselves need to be armed to the teeth, and slap that crap down before it even gets started

And even that will play right into the politicians' hands.

What do they care if some protestors get killed? That's why all this trouble to set up BLM and Antifa. When the shooting starts, it won't be the politicians who have been egging this on that will be in the line of fire... BLM and Antifa will be in the line of fire. The politicians can sit back safely behind their big barricades and finalize their goal: to rid America of privately-owned firearms. No one gets hurt... at least no one that they care about.

It's one hell of a setup if you ask me.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: tanstaafl

The politicians can sit back safely behind their big barricades and finalize their goal: to rid America of privately-owned firearms. No one gets hurt... at least no one that they care about.

Only if we let them.

It's one hell of a setup if you ask me.

Yeah, and they're pretty damn good at things like this too... but we need to get wise to them and beat them at their own game.

Like I said, if it is done right, there will be minimal bloodshed, and lots of prosecutions.

Although the biggest factor that suggests you may be right in how it could go down is the jurisdictions where these things will go down.

I can see the Seattle P.D. arresting those who made Citizen's arrests of the BLM/Antifers and persecuting them for 'false arrest' or some such nonsense.

Well, if there are any Seattle P.D. left by then.

Will mighty antifa show up at the juicy smollyay trial beginning today?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

I've never blindly trusted anything that anyone from any position of authority says....

I didn't mean to trust authority, but if you don't know the facts of the trial, then you should accept the Jury's verdict. That doesn't mean you have to agree with it, but how can you oppose it if you don't know the details and the facts?

I've said it on another thread. I honestly believe that the Progressive Socialists want to start a Civil War in the US. Once that happens Biden will request that the UN send Peacekeepers. Chinese Peacekeepers.

a reply to: shooterbrody

juicy smollyay

I hate that I knew exactly who you were talking about.(and I had no idea he was on trial)


When I got to that part of your comment, I immediately heard Dave Chappelle's voice saying the name. It's his fault that I knew who you were talking about.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles
a reply to: shooterbrody

juicy smollyay

I hate that I knew exactly who you were talking about.(and I had no idea he was on trial)


When I got to that part of your comment, I immediately heard Dave Chappelle's voice saying the name. It's his fault that I knew who you were talking about.

Yep

Justice for juicy

a reply to: JIMC5499

Only one side has made their eagerness for a civil war apparent for years and it's not the Left.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles
I didn't mean to trust authority, but if you don't know the facts of the trial, then you should accept the Jury's verdict.

But that is placing blind trust in the verdict of the jury.

If you don't know the facts of the trial, then you should neither blindly trust nor reject their verdict, if you're going to say anything, you should say 'I have no facts on which to form an intelligent conclusion as to whether or not it was a just verdict.

That doesn't mean you have to agree with it, but how can you oppose it if you don't know the details and the facts?

I agree that you can't oppose it, but neither can you agree with it (intelligently at least).

a reply to: Xcalibur254

You are severely mistaken.

a reply to: JIMC5499

Really? Because we have plenty of people right here on ATS who regularly express a desire to shoot Liberals. They're just looking for an excuse.

a reply to: infolurker

If they shoot first it is game on,we just have to remember
to record everything on our cellphones.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Changed my mind.