It seems BLM and Antifa are officially domestic terrorist.

www.foxnews.com...



Running a vehicle into a crowd of people is not a form of protest , That is a form of terrorism .

The Left media have propped these groups up and refused to condemn them and in doing so they have created a monster .

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Before dope-head George Floyd was removed from this planet, President Trump asked Attorney General Barr to declare ANTIFA as Domestic Terrorists. Barr told him "no".

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Before dope-head George Floyd was removed from this planet, President Trump asked Attorney General Barr to declare ANTIFA as Domestic Terrorists. Barr told him "no".

Barr is part of the old guard. He knew that going after Antifa or BLM he'd be kicked out of the club. Same with voter fraud. The entire Federal Government is Antifa. They terrorize the middle class because the middle class tries to hold them accountable for breaking laws and stealing tax dollars.

Before we get carried away using a push broom as a paint brush, let's be specific here. BLM is not a terrorist movement, it has terrorist members inside of it who BLM as a cohesive agency are obligated to expose and submit to authorities for judicial processing.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Is that definition applicable to any other group, though? What percentage of members have to be one way or the other forghe group as a whole to be terrorist? Or is it the ideology itself that leads to violence that needs to be listed as terroristic?

It's not official until our dumbass government says so.....IMO.
And they wont do so, because they are useful to our government.

originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: TzarChasm

Is that definition applicable to any other group, though? What percentage of members have to be one way or the other forghe group as a whole to be terrorist? Or is it the ideology itself that leads to violence that needs to be listed as terroristic?

What other group are you insinuating?

originally posted by: TzarChasm
Before we get carried away using a push broom as a paint brush, let's be specific here. BLM is not a terrorist movement, it has terrorist members inside of it who BLM as a cohesive agency are obligated to expose and submit to authorities for judicial processing.

If blm has terrorist members and the other members do nothing about them, the whole group is terrorists by supporting terrorism. Deal with the bad guys within your group or you are supporting their actions.

a reply to: shaemac

Is there a reason to limit which groups can and cannot follow that same rule?

originally posted by: TzarChasm
Before we get carried away using a push broom as a paint brush, let's be specific here. BLM is not a terrorist movement, it has terrorist members inside of it who BLM as a cohesive agency are obligated to expose and submit to authorities for judicial processing.

How is BLM not a terrorist movement?

originally posted by: TzarChasm
Before we get carried away using a push broom as a paint brush, let's be specific here. BLM is not a terrorist movement, it has terrorist members inside of it who BLM as a cohesive agency are obligated to expose and submit to authorities for judicial processing.

Hmm, isn't that exactly what the left and the media did with Trump supporters? And the the Tea Party?

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well if you look at all the peaceful Antifa/BLM actions like their charities, soup kitchens, how they help homeless nuns with the shopping and sprinkle rainbows out their asses, how can anyone think that they are terrorists?

originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: shaemac

Is there a reason to limit which groups can and cannot follow that same rule?

I was getting ready to edit my post....I should have read who you were replying to and what they said.
Im in agreement with you.

originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: TzarChasm

Is that definition applicable to any other group, though? What percentage of members have to be one way or the other forghe group as a whole to be terrorist? Or is it the ideology itself that leads to violence that needs to be listed as terroristic?

That's the difference between justice and prejudice. Putting in actual effort and critical thinking skills to distinguish between people who have broken the law and people who have not. Is that too much to ask?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well if you look at all the peaceful Antifa/BLM actions like their charities, soup kitchens, how they help homeless nuns with the shopping and sprinkle rainbows out their asses, how can anyone think that they are terrorists?

Believe it or not, there are many volunteers and philanthropists in BLM who are much like you just described. But that's not useful to the media so it stays quiet.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
Before we get carried away using a push broom as a paint brush, let's be specific here. BLM is not a terrorist movement, it has terrorist members inside of it who BLM as a cohesive agency are obligated to expose and submit to authorities for judicial processing.

The ONLY groups committing acts of violence on innocent people are are BLM and antifa.
Look at the summer of 2020. That was all BLM/Antifa. And BLM 'leaders' never once told/encouraged them to stop.
BLM people are the ones going around the country today robbing stores en masse. Beating up random people. Shooting random people. So on and so forth. They are the ones committing mass crimes in the inner cities.

This is all by the very definition....domestic terrorism.

What other group is doing this?

According to Webster.

Terrorist
Definition of Terrorist
Ter´ror`ist
n. 1. One who governs by terrorism or intimidation; specifically, an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
2. One who commits terrorism[2].


www.webster-dictionary.net...

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: TzarChasm

Is that definition applicable to any other group, though? What percentage of members have to be one way or the other forghe group as a whole to be terrorist? Or is it the ideology itself that leads to violence that needs to be listed as terroristic?

That's the difference between justice and prejudice. Putting in actual effort and critical thinking skills to distinguish between people who have broken the law and people who have not. Is that too much to ask?

Stop while you can before all the dirt you dug out of the hole you are standing in, caves in on you.
There is no other group that is committing domestic terrorism like BLM is.
Don't even TRY and bring up the Proud Boys. They fight scum like BLM/Antifa. They do not go around the country committing acts of violence and crime against innocent people en masse like BLM/Antifa.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Well if you look at all the peaceful Antifa/BLM actions like their charities, soup kitchens, how they help homeless nuns with the shopping and sprinkle rainbows out their asses, how can anyone think that they are terrorists?

Basically they operate like most of the secret societies.

Probably even ran by one or more that pulls their strings.

Hail Lucifer/Mystery Babylon/ Eastern Mysticism

a reply to: TzarChasm

Bullsh*t. If BLM doesn't police it's own ranks and disassociate from those members, then they must bear some of the guilt for them.

That is using the exact same standard that the Left uses for those that they don't like.

Another thing why does BLM have a convicted domestic terrorist in a position of authority?

a reply to: shaemac

I'm doing my best to avoid condemning an entire community based on the violence of a few.