The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

a reply to: Boadicea

Going to trial!!

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea

Going to trial!!

She has to prove her claim.

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Brilliant deduction !! 😎

That's what trials are for 😎

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Thats what courts are historically designed to do......

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Thats what courts are historically designed to do......

I just don't see it meaning much.

Nothing goes anywhere if she can't prove her claims.

a reply to: JinMI

Bless this judge!!!

Bless Kari Lake!!!

Bless us all!!!

Cheers to us 🍻

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Thats what courts are historically designed to do......

I just don't see it meaning much.

Nothing goes anywhere if she can't prove her claims.

Quoting you from a previous page:

I'm trying to focus on legal/facts -- not emotion.

In this case, the judge acknowledged that the arguments warranted evidence and a trial.

Aslo, motions to dismiss from Hobbs were dismissed.

In case you were still concerned with facts.....

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: JinMI

Bless this judge!!!

Bless Kari Lake!!!

Bless us all!!!

Cheers to us 🍻

The battle is just beginning.

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Decertification would be the icing on the cake. Even if she wins in this court, no matter who wins in this court, we all know this is going to the Supreme Court. Neither side will accept defeat that easily.

But the journey -- the trials, the witnesses, the evidence, the sunshine 🌞 -- is invaluable in and of itself.

And the whole world is watching.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Even if she wins in this court, no matter who wins in this court, we all know this is going to the Supreme Court.

NO -- we don't know that.

That is your pipe dream.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: Annee
She has to prove her claim.

Even if she wins in this court, no matter who wins in this court, we all know this is going to the Supreme Court.

NO -- we don't know that.

That is your pipe dream.

Yes, we do.

Lake certainly will and Hobbs has to if she wishes to keep her self certified election.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Boadicea

Going to trial!!

The News Media is in Disbelief. All are painting this as mostly a "loss" for Kari, due to 8 of 10 challenge items being thrown out, and a steep uphill challenge for Kari Lake's attorneys to prove the 2 items the judge is allowing to be presented.

An Arizona judge has dismissed most of Kari Lake’s election lawsuit contesting the victory of her opponent, Gov.-elect Katie Hobbs (D), after Lake for weeks seized on unproven voter fraud allegations.

Lake had asked the judge to set aside Hobbs’s certified victory based on 10 counts, alleging election officials in Maricopa County — which comprises most of the state’s population — committed misconduct and tabulated hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson on Monday evening dismissed eight of the 10 counts, ruling that they did not fall under the proper criteria to bring election challenges under Arizona law, even if true, so they did not merit further consideration.

But Thompson allowed a trial to move forward on two other counts that he said, if proven, could state a claim under the statute governing election challenges: alleged intentional interference by election officials affecting Maricopa County ballot printers and chain of custody violations.

Lake, an ally of former President Trump who promoted unfounded claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election and declined to commit to accepting this year’s results prior to Election Day, must now prove those two allegations in a trial scheduled for later this week.

Source: thehill.com...

AWESOME JOB KARI LAKE!

a reply to: carewemust

On the bright side, it will be much easier and efficient to argue two points than all ten points. And the judge has read the other 8 points, as well as the evidence, and he did allow for those claims to possibly be true... so he knows.

If Kari's attorneys are worth their salt, they'll find a way to work in damning evidence from other points in corroboration for the allowed points.

Most important to me is that chain-of-custody issue will be heard. That seems to be the weakest link in the process.

a reply to: Boadicea

If Kari's attorneys are worth their salt, they'll find a way to work in damning evidence from other points in corroboration for the allowed points.

Certain people with certain testimomy and something called "opening the door."

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: carewemust

On the bright side, it will be much easier and efficient to argue two points than all ten points.

Most important to me is that chain-of-custody issue will be heard. That seems to be the weakest link in the process.

That's a smart way to look at this! And, I recall "chain of custody" also being one of the points with the 2020 Arizona and Pennsylvania election lawsuits.

After Judge Peter Thompson's Ruling Tonight, we are given 6 undisputed facts about the 2022 Arizona election: Election Day issues, ballot counts, legal threats, etc..

HERE: justthenews.com...

a reply to: Annee

What specific facts have you triggered this time?

You realize Due Process applies here right?

The Court found merit.

The fun will be watching the Hobbs Legal Team come up with solid 1st hand undisputable facts, not the standard 2nd hand hearsay and wild ass "out of court" innuendo 😎

a reply to: Annee

NO -- we don't know that.

That is your pipe dream.

Just my pipe dream? LOL 😆 🤣

Apparently this AP writer has the same pipe dream:

Thompson will make a final decision, which will likely be appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.

WGAU Radio

a reply to: carewemust

HERE: justthenews.com...

Fact #2 is quite interesting, especially in terms of evidence that illegitimate and/or illegal ballots were injected into the tally.

How does the Secretary of State have 16,000 more ballots than the County?

And for that matter, how did the number of ballots to be counted increase by 25,000 two days AFTER the election.

So many questions for the trial to answer...