The Fight for Election Integrity Continues -- Audits, Criminal Investigations, Legislative Reform

a reply to: JinMI

There are splits in both parties. The D's happen to be a little better at gaslighting everyone how there isn't on that side while the GOP/MAGA split is much more covered and obvious.

There are definitely splits on the left as well. I wish more people understood this and pointed it out.

Our problem isn't left vs right. Our problem isn't our basic fellow Americans.

Our problem is the power hungry ruthless criminally corrupt ruling class!

a reply to: Boadicea

There are definitely splits on the left as well. I wish more people understood this and pointed it out.

That would require integrity and standards. Some do, most dont.

Our problem isn't left vs right. Our problem isn't our basic fellow Americans.

Our problem is the power hungry ruthless criminally corrupt ruling class!

Agreed, something that used to be a pillar of liberalism. Like being anti war, and inclusive, and anti-authoritarian and..and...and..

a reply to: TheBadCabbie

rsbnetwork

The outlet cited a report revealing how ballots were not being tracked properly or verified, which Amistad Project Director Phill Kline called “concerning.”

a reply to: Irishhaf

Thank you for posting the link. I followed that link to a Just The News link and this stuck out to me:

Kline said that the lack of a requirement for political party observers to be present to witness ballot processing at satellite offices, where mail-in and drop box ballots are handled, is a transparency issue. While the absentee ballot processing centers require political party observers to witness the handling of ballots, the satellite offices do not. He added that absentee ballots are processed before being brought to absentee processing centers, which means that observers are not truly witnessing the entire process of handling ballots.

This pretty much what's happening in Maricopa County, where our absentee ballots are taken to Runbeck-- the ballot printer -- with no observers and no chain-of-custody.

If I remember correctly, Runbeck also prints Fulton County’s ballots. I don't know if Runbeck has facilities in Georgia.

originally posted by: Boadicea
Our problem isn't left vs right. Our problem isn't our basic fellow Americans.

Our problem is the power hungry ruthless criminally corrupt ruling class!

Once again, I have to disagree with your first point: "Our problem isn't left -vs- right." I have (make that had, now) some friends who were Democrats. They're regular people, but.... One of them said that she agreed, at the time of the lockdowns, that people who hadn't been vaccinated should be isolated into "camps." Against their will, of course. Other acquaintances said things similar to that. So, I ditched those friends. I don't need people like that in my life. True Americans don't think like that. Until we can get regular people, who happen to be Democrats and think like that, unbrainwashed, they are going to continue to be part of the problem.

As to your second point, I see you agreed with me. Politicians are all crooks as far as I'm concerned. None of them, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, whatever affiliation, are stopping this madness being unleashed by the current administration. And the election in Arizona is a further example of what seems to be the new normal. With no politicians standing up to election fraud and doing nothing to attempt to stop it, that's the way it's going to be from here on out. Well, maybe a couple are speaking out, but they don't seem to try very hard and are ineffective. Almost like they're just token opposition.

So, until we can get this twisted way of Liberal/Progressive thinking stopped, and it's coming from politicians and left-leaning regular people, America is going down the tubes. I'm sure you see it circling the drain just like I do.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

We'll have to agree to disagree.

I don't see the same distinctions you see. I don't see any virtue in a political party with the power to "stop" how others think.

I'm no more interested in being tyranized by the right than I am by the left.

We need to find middle ground on a level playing field.

The MO. and LA. Attorney Generals are doing what Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich should be doing, if he wasn't corrupted. From Missouri...

The sworn depositions being taken by the Missouri and Louisiana Attorney Generals over the past 2 weeks, are revealing honest-to-goodness bombshells!

Last week, the top FBI manager from California described how the FBI met with Facebook/Twitter every week to ensure their content was helping Biden and hurting Trump!

The US GOVERNMENT (and US media) did more to interfere in our Presidential election than all the "foreign meddlers" combined...100 times more!

Source: ago.mo.gov...

So apparently K ari filed her lawsuit late this afternoon. No particulars yet.

originally posted by: Boadicea
So apparently K ari filed her lawsuit late this afternoon. No particulars yet.

And the fireworks bitter jealousy starts !! Hobbs reverting back the the Year 75000BC 😃


Gov-Elect Katie Hobbs
@katiehobbs

A statement from our campaign manager on Kari Lake’s latest desperate attempt to undermine our democracy and throw out the will of the voters.

Baseless lawsuits don’t vote. Arizonans do.

a reply to: Boadicea

Kari posting receipts.

Its on now.

a reply to: JinMI

Liz Harrington is also.

Not just going after the machine malfunctions either; chain-of-custody issues and mismatched signatures as well.

a reply to: xuenchen

Damn! Katie got that out before anyone even had a chance to read the lawsuit!!!

Update on lawsuits -- plural -- filed yesterday:

Mark Finchem files lawsuit challenging November election results, claims Hobbs abused power -- www.azfamily.com...

Kari Lake lawsuit alleges thousands of illegal votes counted during midterm election -- www.azfamily.com...

Abe Hamadeh, RNC push forward with lawsuit against top election officials -- www.azfamily.com...

Hamadeh And Lake Campaigns File Lawsuits Against 2022 Election -- arizonadailyindependent.com...

BREAKING: Kari Lake Files 70 Page Lawsuit to Throw Out Fraudulent Arizona Midterm Election Results – Claims HUNDREDS of Thousands of Illegal Ballots, 59% of ED Precinct Machine Failures, Tens of Thousands of Illicit Mail-in Ballots -- www.thegatewaypundit.com... ousands-illegal-ballots-59-precinct-machine-failures-election-day-t/

I haven't finished reading Kari's filing yet, but I'm taking notes and will post a summary later.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Boadicea
So apparently K ari filed her lawsuit late this afternoon. No particulars yet.

And the fireworks bitter jealousy starts !! Hobbs reverting back the the Year 75000BC 😃


Gov-Elect Katie Hobbs
@katiehobbs

A statement from our campaign manager on Kari Lake’s latest desperate attempt to undermine our democracy and throw out the will of the voters.

Baseless lawsuits don’t vote. Arizonans do.

Re: www.cnn.com...

I wonder how many levels Kari Lake's WELL-BASED lawsuit will have to elevate before a non-corrupt judge is found?

Hopefully, there will be no up-front rejection.

This just burns me up. This article, published in the Daily Mail UK talks about Kari Lake and the election in Arizona:

Kari Lake asks Arizona court to THROW OUT results of gubernatorial election

What really caught my attention was these two sentences that were adjacent to each other:

"Lines backed up in some polling places, fueling Republican suspicions that some supporters were unable to cast a ballot, though there's no evidence it affected the outcome."

and:

"County officials say everyone was able to vote and all legal ballots were counted."

It's so obvious that there is a double standard there and in people's thinking. The first sentence said there was "no evidence it affected the outcome." In the second sentence, I see no evidence provided for the county's claim that "everyone was able to vote and all legal ballots were counted." All things should be equal, so shouldn't both sides have to provide evidence before their "claim" can be authenticated? Or are we just supposed to take the word of one side, but not the other?

As a side note, I also notice the county didn't mention if any illegal ballots were counted. Nothing to see here, right?


TCB

Edited to add this:

Reading through the comments on the above article, you can clearly see there are two camps/opinions represented. One side is asking about the anomalies because they want answers. The other side, almost unilaterally, are just calling Kari Lake vile names and saying bad things about her. What does that tell you about the two different types of people in each camp? One side is civil and can carry on an adult conversation. The other side is resorting to childish name calling. Which side do you associate with?

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: JinMI

Liz Harrington is also.

Not just going after the machine malfunctions either; chain-of-custody issues and mismatched signatures as well.

So.

What will happen should the judge throw it out?

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

The shill-bots are already swarming 🤣

TGP doesnt scream top tier journalism to me but here it is anyway.

Link

a reply to: JinMI

So.

What will happen should the judge throw it out?

I assume she would try to appeal.... or perhaps re-file in a federal court... or she gives up and doesn't do anything.

I can't think of any other options.

originally posted by: JinMI
TGP doesnt scream top tier journalism to me but here it is anyway.

Link

The ever-present TGP problem... biased as can be and makes no bones about it. But they also post what others do not and will not. Like a Runbeck whistlebower.

(ETA: I did just look... no one else in Big Media is reporting on a Runbeck whistleblower. Other blogs and smaller websites have picked up TGP's reporting tho.)

TGP quotes from the lawsuit, so if they've misquoted the lawsuit, I'm sure someone will make an issue of it. I'm only on page #26 (of 70 pages), and I haven't seen the quoted parts yet, but has already mentioned the Runbeck whistleblower.

For now I'll accept it as basically factual as presented...