It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PiratesCut
a reply to: Justoneman
Just where does Elon tie in?
The OP starts with his name but there’s nothing about him.
What exactly are his beliefs in fuel cells, have any links to what he has said online or in interviews?
There’s got to be way more than this out there……no?
originally posted by: Ahabstar
Seems to me the focus should be on Direct Methanols Fuel Cells to lower initial and operation costs and have safer fuel/refueling storage. But I admit that I really never studied it as fuel cells seemed a stop gap replacement between ICE and some future tech. Department of Energy
originally posted by: PiratesCut
a reply to: Justoneman
Whenever I read anything about stored hydrogen a picture flashes in my mind from May 6, 1937, in Manchester Township, New Jersey.
originally posted by: IncognitoGhostman
a reply to: Justoneman
Due to the constraints of today's manufacturing and design technology. We can't get away from oil. Everything uses oil/petroleum in manufacturing.
The idea of using hydrogen is a way to limit the use of it. We would also not need to spend billions on upgrading electrical infrastructure for hybrid cars.
GM designed a hydrogen powered engine themselves. It was front page news in the Democrat & Chronicle in Rochester NY, about 1 month before 9/11. It was actually a division of GM called Delphi. I remember the engineer in the article saying, "it was surprisingly easy to make a normal engine run on hydrogen."
With a technology that's apparently easy to retrofit, has zero carbon emissions. Why is the only mention of it 20-30 years ago? We all know the answer is of course profit. Big oil would be out of so much money.
I have looked on the internet for this article, to no avail. I need to head to a local library and see if it's on microfilm.