It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: slowie
a reply to: musicismagic
point 2. could be true could be false. I only take into consideration things that make the most logical sense and more importantly we can prove. although with the state of the world it's not much of a stretch to believe this as we have never been so broken as a planet (last time was American independence. this time its the entire world being split in 2)
I hope someday, we can all have a rational and controlled conversation about all of this. But that hope is becoming harder to maintain. Good luck everyone.
originally posted by: KleenX
I am neither for nor against the vaccine (for individuals of consenting age). I find the vitriol of both polar extremes tiresome but more importantly very reminiscent of my earlier days as I struggled free from the mental tyranny inflicted on me by a fundamentalist baptist cult.
The louder and more dramatic the claims of either side become, the less likely I am to listen. This frantic black and white approach is telling. A wise man once said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. If the claims of either side are anything, they certainly are extraordinary but the evidence is lacking. Each camp lacks integral, albeit different, components necessary to validate their extremist claims.
“Science” (or rather something vaguely resembling it) has become the now religion. Blind faith and mindless devotion has found a new focal point. Validation by way of identifying via ego mass, empty platitudes and vacuous mantras have been pulled from propping up religious extremism and have now been made the underpinnings of the new cult ideology. “Trust the science”. “I follow the science”. “The science shows…”. All of these emphatic statements are most often uttered by laymen, average people, news celebrities and politicians. All of whom know little or nothing directly about which they speak. Instead they rely on hearsay and second-hand information at best. As do I. However, since I recognize the fragile foundation of my knowledge of the subject, I choose to do what any rational thinker would. That is, to withhold judgement.
Atheism is not a positive claim. It is merely a lack of belief in the claims of a theist. So, my approach to the “science” of both the vaccine and the virus is the same. I make no positive claims either way. I am an “a-vaccinist” and an “a-COVIDist” until such time as I am convinced.
I hope someday, we can all have a rational and controlled conversation about all of this. But that hope is becoming harder to maintain. Good luck everyone.
originally posted by: slowie
as for people who are pro-vaccine they think that the vaccine is a wonder drug that will make covid disappear overnight if everyone like myself stops being selfish and just has the jab.