It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kimish
a reply to: ATruGod
Correct, the "Comirnaty" is the one that approved by the FDA. At the time it was approved, wasn't readily available as I understand it. So, folks getting their Pfizer vaccine were not getting the approved version unbeknownst to them.
If you're forced to take the jab, make sure to ask to see the box the vaccine came in so you know you're getting the FDA approved vaccine, Comirnaty.
originally posted by: ATruGod
originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: anonentity
The whole idea of taking an experimental vaccine
Pfizer is FDA approved, therefore not experimental.
BUT NOT AVAILABLE!!
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: SirHardHarry
Look mate the vaccine being used is not the approved one there is a difference.www.bitchute.com...
originally posted by: SirHardHarry
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: SirHardHarry
Look mate the vaccine being used is not the approved one there is a difference.www.bitchute.com...
Because bitchute said?
Or do you have actual data to back up your claim?
originally posted by: anonentity
It is admitted it is not the same, but they say the difference does not affect its safety. Take that as you want to.
originally posted by: ADAMandEVIL
Nurmeberg Code
The Nuremberg Code came out of a trial in post-war Germany in December of 1946, the second of the Nuremberg trials.
It doesn't cover vaccines, it was intended for non-consentual experimentationFactcheck.org
Neither the Nuremberg Code nor the Declaration of Helsinki is legally binding or legally enforceable in its own right.
No, Covid Vaccine Mandates Don’t Violate the Nuremberg Code Bloomberg