New UAP video, possibly connected to Lue and co. Nicknamed “the flying rubber duck”

originally posted by: Violater1
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
…….”that has a UAP morphing in and out of the Rubber Ducky form. I did the best I could, but if you watch the video, you can see the similarities.

Here are as similar as duck shaped as possible……..(using iPad mini)



👽🧐🍺

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

What's the size of the square in the original image? If it's a 8 x 8 pixels square then it's most likely a compression artefact.

a reply to: ArMaP

most FLIR isn't exactly 1080p rez and are surprisingly low res compared to what 4K and 8K TV shows, dont get me wrong SOME are high rez but this one is not.


zooming in on a YouTube video isn't good proof of anything


we would need the raw data to make any sort of calls of fakery are made

a reply to: penroc3

I agree, but it's also possible that the (possible) compression artefact is a result of the YouTube compression, so it will appear as a 8 x 8 square in that video.

Obviously, if we had the original video it would be much better.

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: ArMaP

most FLIR isn't exactly 1080p rez and are surprisingly low res compared to what 4K and 8K TV shows, dont get me wrong SOME are high rez but this one is not.


zooming in on a YouTube video isn't good proof of anything


we would need the raw data to make any sort of calls of fakery are made

I agree that the raw data would provide accurate optimal pixel counts. Numerous iterations would mostly give wrong counts since the raw data has been modified by cropping, resizing, adjusting aspect ratio’s, copy re-copy, duplications, degradations etc. of the original.

Hell, who knows what iteration I’ve used to show what I posted…….in view of not having the original raw data..my findings could indeed be totally skewed with inaccurate pixels counts. It’s like garage in, garbage out.

In spite of the pixel issue….on the surface of what I had to work with, for my posts, I maintain that the object in the video is a fake … and is an inserted special effect….in the absence of the raw data, for me to armchair analyze.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

of course.

do you have any idea of what it may be, it acts kind of like a balloon. Some materials that blocks normal light IR goes RIGHT past it.

a black garbage bag is transparent to FLIR and i would assume that latex or some other balloon materials would be transparent as well

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

of course.

do you have any idea of what it may be, it acts kind of like a balloon. Some materials that blocks normal light IR goes RIGHT past it.

a black garbage bag is transparent to FLIR and i would assume that latex or some other balloon materials would be transparent as well

No, I don’t know what it might be. I’m somewhat inept in the technicalities aspects of the resolutions of Flir. Any guestamated count I give you of pixels could be off by an order of magnitude compared to the original raw video.

👽🧮

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

i wasn't being sarcastic i was really wondering about your ideas of what it is

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

i wasn't being sarcastic i was really wondering about your ideas of what it is

Ahhh I misunderstood. Pardonne-moi…… I thought we were still on the pixel questioning.

I simply think what I’ve been saying, only this time I’ll use the word Hoax. I think it’s a series of graphic alternating shapes and given a seamless motion of flight. The effort almost succeeds with me accept for the squaring’s already discussed that leads me to believe sophisticated software was used……but the perpetrator got a little sloppy and the inconsistencies by revealing the squarings during the object’s flight is apparent to me (maybe no one else) because of it……. IMO. As for a balloon, it’s not a consideration for me. I can find frames of the shapes that show me differently…. from being a balloon.

I didn’t think you were being sarcastic although your avatar character is ….on tv.

👽🍺

Reminds me of the Nellis footage.

a reply to: Blackfinger

that was a Russian chopper.