Covid vaccines are not effective, they give you AIDS and make you infertile

a reply to: natoshis

This is a snippet from a letter written by an ICU physician & surgeon to the FDA & CDC, describing some of the vaccine injured patients she's seen: Link

A federal judge just told United Airlines they can NOT force their employees to be injected with these potentially dangerous covid-19 vaccines.

conservativebrief.com...

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: natoshis

This is a snippet from a letter written by an ICU physician & surgeon to the FDA & CDC, describing some of the vaccine injured patients she's seen: Link

I fail to see the point? The vaccine can and has been proven to have adverse effects. Why is this case special?

a reply to: Kreeate

It was the mention of pneumocystis pneumonia that I was pointing out.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Kreeate

It was the mention of pneumocystis pneumonia that I was pointing out.

So what?

a reply to: Kreeate

So, my reply was not directed to you. That's what.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Kreeate

So, my reply was not directed to you. That's what.

If your point cannot be made across multiple platforms, then perhaps the issue is not with anyone else?
Or perhaps not within your "linguistic" capability'?

a reply to: Kreeate

OR, I figured the OP would definitely know why I posted that and if you do not, you can do the work to figure it out on your own. If not, maybe this thread is above your head.

originally posted by: carewemust
A federal judge just told United Airlines they can NOT force their employees to be injected with these potentially dangerous covid-19 vaccines.

conservativebrief.com...

"To be sure, the Court is not currently ruling on the merits of the parties’ arguments on these points. Rather, the Court seeks simply to avoid the risk of irreparable harm to the parties and to maintain the status quo while the Court holds an evidentiary hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and issues an Order on the same,” it said."

So, it's a temporary ruling to maintain the status quo pending a decision on the merits. Which has yet to be made.

Please don't misrepresent it as being anything other than that.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

Please don't misrepresent it as being anything other than that.

lol, because they have never done that before , leopard and spots my friend

a reply to: UpThenDown

Indeed. Throw enough mud and hope some of it sticks, and all that.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Kreeate

OR, I figured the OP would definitely know why I posted that and if you do not, you can do the work to figure it out on your own. If not, maybe this thread is above your head.

Oh I certainly have a good idea as to why you posted. Conspiracy nuts band together don't they.

PS: The idiom is "over your head", not "above your head".

a reply to: Kreeate

Gaslighting isn't a conspiracy

But you already know that eh

originally posted by: DAVG1980
a reply to: Kreeate

Gaslighting isn't a conspiracy

But you already know that eh

Why are you addressing me? I was replying to someone else.

a reply to: Kreeate

Aye OK
Is that you Prince William

originally posted by: natoshis

Here's data from the England health report titled "SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England" - Technical briefing 23- Published on 17 September 2021.This briefing provides an update on previous briefings up to 3 September 2021

Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk...

From the article above:

"Deaths within 28 days of positive specimen date"
"All cases: 2,542"
"Dose 1 deaths within 28 days: 149
"Dose 2 deaths within 28 days: 1,613
"Unvaccinated deaths within 28 days: 722"

Considering there are so many jabbed persons now in developed countries, going by your own metrics there ought to be a greater and significant representation of jabbed "unvaccinated" persons vs unjabbed "unvaccinated" persons, if 70-95% of the population in most developed countries received at least one jab by now, which means that the representation of "unvaccinated persons" may be conflated up to 20 times greater than the number actually is.

This would very likely be apparent in statistics of "unvaccinated persons" risk of mortality and morbidity to covid, if the statistics of "unvaccinated" persons only measured persons who have never received a covid injection - and not conflating that data with persons who received a covid injection less than 14 days before subsequent infection with covid.

There are multiple sources of information confirming this, here's one from the CDC itself.

"Persons were considered fully vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the second dose in a 2-dose series (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines) or after 1 dose of the single-dose Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine; partially vaccinated ≥14 days after receipt of the first dose and less than 14 days after the second dose in a 2-dose series; and unvaccinated less than 14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available."
† *Among residents of Los Angeles County; excludes Pasadena and Long Beach*

If the vaccine was effective, then you would expect to see way less hospitalisations from vaccinated persons. Full stop, no matter how you try to spin it. It doesn't. Meta-analysis on peer reviewed studies (which is the strongest clinical grade of evidence available) have shown both quercetin and ivermectin to be 70-80% effective at reducing hospitalisations and deaths. Compared to your vax which is 50% effective at best, -50% to -300% effective at worst? I'm not talking about monotherapy studies, but studies where patients take quercetin and ivermectin with zinc (no point taking a zinc carrier without any zinc supplementation if you're deficient in zinc, or during very late stages of the disease the outcomes of patient treatment will obviously be poorer.)

The data shows that people who were vaccinated earlier have a greater risk of developing serious symptoms in later infections. That sounds awfully a lot like Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) to me.


Currently the Pfizer is less than 39% effective due to mutations. From 95% effective down to 39% effective due to mutations within a year:


Here's an interesting video showing lab antibody tests after the first and second jabs. Not someones opinion, this is measurable evidence and data extrapolated from serology lab results, from objective scientific t-cell count tests. This was just a single patient though, so it would be nice if doctors were routinely doing these lab tests. If similar effects are happening to many vaxxed people, then this is a nightmare scenario.

To summarize, he began by showing the patient's pre-jab labs which were normal:

- After the first jab, CD8 cells came back high (lymphocytes). These are the killer T cells.

- After the second jab...

• Granulocytes were high meaning the patient's immune system was responding to tissue damage.

• Lymphocytes (including CD8 and Natural Killer) cells were low -- leaving the patient vulnerable to 'breakthrough' infections.

• CD3-/CD56+CD16+(Natural Killer) cells were low -- they are first responders to viral infections and cancer cells.

All other immune lab scores came back on the lower end of normal, too, after the second jab.

IOW, the patient's adaptive immune system "tanked." This doctor said the patient's lab results point to an auto-immune disorder they did not have prior to the jabs. Why the # would you take this? It's destroying your immune system:A deficiency in an autoimmune response, or a reduced auto-immune response, is an auto-immune deficiency syndrome, otherwise known as AIDS.

Important Update - July 13, 2022

ANTHONY FAUCI COMES CLEAN

In the Summer of 2021, President Biden assured Americans that those who get the Covid-19 vaccine, WILL NOT contract the Covid-19 virus.

Now, the nation's #1 authority on Covid-19, ANTHONY FAUCI, is throwing his boss (Joe Biden) under the bus, by telling the truth about Covid-19 vaccines....That they do a horrible job of preventing Covid-19 infection.

BOOM!: www.foxnews.com...

I think Fauci is trying to soften the hearts of those who want him out, after Republicans take control of Congress, just 7 months from now.