It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MickeyDee
If as the bible states Jesus was reserected on Easter Sunday, and that is the day to celebrate the reserection, then how does the date of easter sunday change every year?
Jesus was supposedly born on the 25th of Dec and we always celebrate that on the same day, but the dates of easter change every year.
What date was he reserected on and why dont we celebrate easter then regardless of wether its a sunday or not!!!
Have ever wonder what 'Santa Claus' has to do with the birth of Jesus Christ.
Another question would be...what the 'Easter' bunny has to do with the resurection (or near-death) of Jesus Christ?
easter is always celebrated on the sunday after the jewish passover. as the passover is according to the jewish calendar, and not ours, it fluctuates from year to year because the jewish calendar is LUNAR whereas ours is SOLAR.
ROTFL! I always wondered myself about this, this is as good an explanation as any, including Constantine's:
Originally posted by Zabilgy
That's because Jesus and Santa Claus are the same person and when Jesus was reincarnated, he was reincarnated into the Easter Bunny! HIs wife, Mary Magdeline was actually reincarnated into the tooth fairy!
When the question relative to the sacred festival of Easter arose, it was universally thought that it would be convenient that all should keep the feast on one day; for what could be more beautiful and more desirable, than to see this festival, through which we receive the hope of immortality, celebrated by all with one accord, and in the same
manner? It was declared to be particularly unworthy for this, the
holiest of all festivals, to follow the custom[the calculation] of the
Jews, who had soiled their hands with the most fearful of crimes, and
whose minds were blinded. In rejecting their custom,(1) we may transmit to our descendants the legitimate mode of celebrating Easter, which we have observed from the time of the Saviour's Passion to the present day[according to the day of the week]. We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews, for the Saviour has shown us another way; our worship follows a more legitimate and more convenient course(the order of the days of the week); and consequently, in unanimously adopting this mode, we desire, dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews, for it is truly shameful for us to hear them boast that without their direction we could not keep this feast. ...
Besides, consider well, that in such an important matter, and on a subject of such great solemnity, there ought not to be any division. Our Saviour has left us only one festal day of our redemption, that is to say, of his holy passion, and he desired[to establish] only one Catholic Church. Think, then, how unseemly it is, that on the same day some should be fasting whilst others are seated at a banquet; and that after Easter, some should be rejoicing at feasts,
whilst others are still observing a strict fast. For this reason, a Divine Providence wills that this custom should be rectified and regulated in a uniform way; and everyone, I hope, will agree upon this point. As, on the one hand, it is our duty not to have anything in common with the murderers of our Lord; and as, on the other, the custom now followed by the Churches of the West, of the South, and of
the North, and by some of those of the East, is the most acceptable, it
has appeared good to all; and I have been guarantee for your consent,
that you would accept it with joy, as it is followed at Rome, in Africa, in all Italy, Egypt, Spain, Gaul, Britain, Libya, in all Achaia, and in the dioceses of Asia, of Pontus, and Cilicia. You should consider not only that the number of churches in these provinces make a majority, but also that it is right to demand what our reason approves, and that we should have nothing in common with the Jews. ...
Originally posted by Croat56
It changes every year because we want it to actually be on Sunday. If it stayed the same it would go on monday the next year then tuesday and so on.
Originally posted by mwen
Have ever wonder what 'Santa Claus' has to do with the birth of Jesus Christ.
Another question would be...what the 'Easter' bunny has to do with the resurection (or near-death) of Jesus Christ?
Originally posted by savannah
The Lunar calendar explination was right on the spot. This is probably the only religious holiday that we are sure we celebrate on the right date. I don't think Christmas is anywere near close.
The sixth month of the Hebrew calendar is August-September, or late summer. Soon after that Mary went to visit Elizabeth and it is clear that Mary had become pregnant a while before she visited her cousin. From Matthew's account it would appear that Joseph and Mary were married before Mary set off for Judea (probably Hebron) to see Elizabeth. Mary spent three months in Hebron with Elizabeth. Since Mary's pregnancy commenced a little before the sixth month, i.e. around July, or perhaps even a little earlier (the scriptures are not definite), Jesus would be born somewhere around March-June, i.e. in the SPRING. John the Baptist would have been born in the autumn/fall or early winter, probably around October/November.
Is there any further evidence that Jesus was born in the spring? Indeed there is, and it is probably the most devastating evidence against those who believe in a 25 December or 6 January birth: "And she brought forth her firstborn son , and wrapped Him in swaddling clothes, and laid Him in a manger; because there was no room at the inn. And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the fields , keeping watch over their flock by night" (Luke 2:7-8, AV). In Palestine sheep are brought in from the fields in the middle of October for the duration of the winter, which is VERY COLD on the hills of the Holy Land. The fact the shepherds were watching over their flocks by night, in the fields, shows conclusively that the time of the birth of Jesus could NOT have been in the autumn or winter (i.e. 25 December or 6 January). After the cold season the sheep are let out into the fields again in about MID-MARCH.
THEREFORE JESUS HAD TO HAVE BEEN BORN BETWEEN MID-MARCH AND MID-OCTOBER unless it is argued that this text has been tampered with also. And the story of Mary's conception narrows it down to March-June.
At best, the passage narrows down the birth month to one of 7 months in the late spring, summer, or early fall.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Really, Marg?
Hmm, never read a "scholar" asserting that Jesus was a Pisces. Thats an astrology thing and religious "scholars" do not dwell in astrology, do they?
Originally posted by Marid Audran
Originally posted by Croat56
It changes every year because we want it to actually be on Sunday. If it stayed the same it would go on monday the next year then tuesday and so on.
Are you being sarcastic with this part of your post?
Here is an excellent link explaining it in great detail:
aa.usno.navy.mil...
Pick and choose the contradiction that best suits your want to contradict.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Really, Marg?
Hmm, never read a "scholar" asserting that Jesus was a Pisces. Thats an astrology thing and religious "scholars" do not dwell in astrology, do they?
The sixth month of the Hebrew calendar is August-September, or late summer. Soon after that Mary went to visit Elizabeth and it is clear that Mary had become pregnant a while before she visited her cousin.