Coming for the kids..

apnews.com...

The Los Angeles board of education voted Thursday to require students 12 and older to be vaccinated against the coronavirus to attend in-person classes in the nation’s second-largest school district.

Here it comes… for the kids!

I am vaccinated and am not “anti-vax” but I have young children and question administering this jab to them given they are young, healthy and most importantly still developing.

I aint as good as I once was so I’m not worried about me… but dang this news stirs me up a bit when it comes to forcing this on children.

I’m sure this thinking will spread like wildfire - and this probably won’t be the last pass at the children.

a reply to: VulcanWerks

How old are your children? Pfizer is approved for those over 16; emergency use for those 12-15.

Based upon the number of schools having to quarantine students and/or go virtual in the first few weeks of the year, why is this a bad idea?

Don't we want to keep our kids as safe as possible using the scientific knowledge we have so they can safely return to school?

a reply to: VulcanWerks

This guy thinks they’re the State’s property already!!

“They are our Provence’s children.”

Turd.

a reply to: SirHardHarry

I'm pushing 50 so long term effects will be minimal most likely...

A 12 yr old has there entire life ahead of them and we don't even have an inkling of what this stuff will do long term.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: VulcanWerks

How old are your children? Pfizer is approved for those over 16; emergency use for those 12-15.

Based upon the number of schools having to quarantine students and/or go virtual in the first few weeks of the year, why is this a bad idea?

Don't we want to keep our kids as safe as possible using the scientific knowledge we have so they can safely return to school?

The fatality rate for COVID-19 in children under 17 is roughly 400 nationwide. Can you tell me with 100% certainty (as well as provide data) that the number of potential deaths from the experimental vaccine will be lower than that? I feel that your heart is in the right place, I’m not trying to start an argument. I just feel that using a one size fits all with the vaccines without knowing the potential risks in a certain age group is a bit dangerous.

a reply to: VulcanWerks

The fact that is worrying that children and youth can get health issues side effects from 12/15 its worry it seems they dont care anymore about the children.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: VulcanWerks

How old are your children? Pfizer is approved for those over 16; emergency use for those 12-15.

Based upon the number of schools having to quarantine students and/or go virtual in the first few weeks of the year, why is this a bad idea?

Don't we want to keep our kids as safe as possible using the scientific knowledge we have so they can safely return to school?

######## ####### god #### are you ####### kidding Jesus.?

a reply to: ManSizedSquirrel

In UK
Scientists told polticans who are careless about the dangerous of heart inflammations of not giving them the vaxs to 12/15.

They ignored the advice's.

If you cant sue the drug markers i am sure you can sue the polticans who pushed heavily for the vaxs.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: SirHardHarry

A 12 yr old has there entire life ahead of them and we don't even have an inkling of what this stuff will do long term.

Help prevent sickness, just like all the other vaccines we've been required to get as children in order to attend school that have prevented and mostly eliminated outbreaks of diseases?

a reply to: SirHardHarry

The decisions that we make every day have consequences - good and bad.

When we do these things we weigh the consequences using all of the information we know or research. We do it routinely, daily.

Why is it so wrong for someone to follow this method with the vaccine.

I don’t understand why some of the vaxed are so afraid of catching something that I MAY have that they are already protected against?

Last year everyone (well most) thought that the government was making rules and responses in their best interest. I said back then that the government will be using this as an excuse to get your kids. I was looked at by many as being paranoid.

My paranoia keeps me alive, what does yours do?

a reply to: ManSizedSquirrel

The fatality rate for COVID-19 in children under 17 is roughly 400 nationwide.

Do they only interact with those under 17, or with society at large, parents, grandparents, some who may or may not be or believe in vaccinations? Vaccination is about protection for us all. Children have been required to be vaccinated for school for a long time. This is not new. It's only become an issue because of propaganda and (anti-science) information warfare that wants to see us fight and die.

the experimental vaccine

Which one is experimental?

a reply to: SirHardHarry

Because there are no long term studies on problems caused by this down the road, and you cant take it out.

A faith based approach for science is worse than the religious fundamentalists who protest. Science is only as good as the amount of times it has been fully challenged.

"Comming for the kids"! .... I personally can not think of a better reason to "go to war"! Commie F'ers!.. Meh!.. I've gone "to war" for less. .... ("Think of the children!")... Yeah, you'll Probably die, that's a given.

But if you can take 3,4,..or 5 of them, F'ers with you?.. That's some good, "legitimate" "voting".

a reply to: TrollMagnet

Because there are no long term studies on problems caused by this down the road, and you cant take it out.

It's built on years and years of scientific study on disease, vaccines, and coronavirus work. That's how science works: it builds off previous knowledge.

Which is why it works.

originally posted by: VulcanWerks
apnews.com...

The Los Angeles board of education voted Thursday to require students 12 and older to be vaccinated against the coronavirus to attend in-person classes in the nation’s second-largest school district.

Here it comes… for the kids!

I am vaccinated and am not “anti-vax” but I have young children and question administering this jab to them given they are young, healthy and most importantly still developing.

I aint as good as I once was so I’m not worried about me… but dang this news stirs me up a bit when it comes to forcing this on children.

I’m sure this thinking will spread like wildfire - and this probably won’t be the last pass at the children.

It is coming for all...even infants. Even though kids have almost no problems with covid....

The left ushered this in and fear has propagated it.

It will not end well.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: TrollMagnet

Because there are no long term studies on problems caused by this down the road, and you cant take it out.

It's built on years and years of scientific study on disease, vaccines, and coronavirus work. That's how science works: it builds off previous knowledge.

Which is why it works.

Please post the studies on how mRNA has worked on humans. I won't hold my breath.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: ManSizedSquirrel

The fatality rate for COVID-19 in children under 17 is roughly 400 nationwide.

Do they only interact with those under 17, or with society at large, parents, grandparents, some who may or may not be or believe in vaccinations? Vaccination is about protection for us all. Children have been required to be vaccinated for school for a long time. This is not new. It's only become an issue because of propaganda and (anti-science) information warfare that wants to see us fight and die.

the experimental vaccine

Which one is experimental?

Yes, kids have, with vaccines that have been tested and proven for decades.

Experimental? Any covid vaccine on the market. None have approval for children. None have been tested long term on anyone.

GTFOH with your idiocy.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: ManSizedSquirrel

The fatality rate for COVID-19 in children under 17 is roughly 400 nationwide.

Do they only interact with those under 17, or with society at large, parents, grandparents, some who may or may not be or believe in vaccinations? Vaccination is about protection for us all. Children have been required to be vaccinated for school for a long time. This is not new. It's only become an issue because of propaganda and (anti-science) information warfare that wants to see us fight and die.

the experimental vaccine

Which one is experimental?

Technically all three of the vaccines are by definition, experimental because there is no real good data on the widespread use in that age segment. So with that being said can you provide me with the testing data and incident reporting based on that age segment? I don’t think you can. The most important thing in this world is my child (if I had one), my job is to ensure their safety over everyone else. If you can’t guarantee that my child is safer taking the vaccine than getting the virus, then my child will not be getting the shot.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: SirHardHarry

A 12 yr old has there entire life ahead of them and we don't even have an inkling of what this stuff will do long term.

Help prevent sickness, just like all the other vaccines we've been required to get as children in order to attend school that have prevented and mostly eliminated outbreaks of diseases?

Show me any vaccine you've been required to get that has less than a year of testing.

I am done being kind to people like you.

You are trash. Throw yourself out.