It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The youngest child to be killed was two-year-old Sumaya, and the oldest child was 12-year-old Farzad, the family told the BBC. "It's wrong, it's a brutal attack, and it's happened based on wrong information," Ramin Yousufi, a relative of the victims, said. He added, tearfully: "Why have they killed our family? Our children? They are so burned out we cannot identify their bodies, their faces." Another relative, Emal Ahmadi, told the BBC that it was his two-year-old daughter who was killed in the strike.
originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
The youngest child to be killed was two-year-old Sumaya, and the oldest child was 12-year-old Farzad, the family told the BBC. "It's wrong, it's a brutal attack, and it's happened based on wrong information," Ramin Yousufi, a relative of the victims, said. He added, tearfully: "Why have they killed our family? Our children? They are so burned out we cannot identify their bodies, their faces." Another relative, Emal Ahmadi, told the BBC that it was his two-year-old daughter who was killed in the strike.
US investigates civilian deaths in Kabul strike
I dont know what to say, im supposed to write at least a couple of lines.
Theres video at the link.
American lack of intelligence hit the wrong target. My heart goes out to the family.
War is Hell...
The Sunday afternoon drone attack, which the US claimed was conducted on an Islamic State in Khorasan Province (ISKP, or ISIS-K) target, killed 10 members of the families, ranging from two to 40 years old.
It's also worth noting these barbarians
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: SecretKnowledge
There's conflicting reports about whether the civilians were killed by the air strike or by a secondary blast from the explosive material the terrorists were carrying.
It's also worth noting these barbarians aren't above dragging their kids along on terror missions or keeping bombs and other dangerous material right next to homes and schools, etc. If our intelligence revealed there was going to be significant civilian casualties and we went ahead anyway, we are still entitled to hit it under the Law of Armed Conflict if it's to protect the lives of our own people. We do NOT have to let our people be killed just because the terrorists decide to put civilians in harm's way. That is part of the horror of war. Civilians die in war, especially wars against a despicable enemy that hides behind civilians.
We'll never know the truth. I don't trust the Taliban or the American administration to tell us what really happened.