It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NightVision
a reply to: MPoling
It's bewildering to think that in the U.S. we build massive oil pipelines that span the country. But we can't build water pipelines to catch the excessive snowmelt from the east to carry it into the drought areas in the southwest.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
They would likely have plenty if it wasn't for the deals with the overpopulated cities to be able to use the reservoirs and rivers for themselves.
originally posted by: MPoling
Im sure there is no long term effects right? I mean the post does say its better than using chemicals, does that mean they used chemicals prior? We continue to play God more and more..
www.mirror.co.uk...
originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: NightVision
Isn’t it illegal to collect rainwater in some areas?
originally posted by: MPoling
Im sure there is no long term effects right? I mean the post does say its better than using chemicals, does that mean they used chemicals prior? We continue to play God more and more..
www.mirror.co.uk...
For years environmentalists blocked the building of reservoirs in California. Plenty of snow melt each year in the Sierra Nevadas to water all of the state. But, all you can do is watch it roll by on its way down river to the ocean. Ya get whatcha vote for.
originally posted by: NightVision
a reply to: MPoling
It's bewildering to think that in the U.S. we build massive oil pipelines that span the country. But we can't build water pipelines to catch the excessive snowmelt from the east to carry it into the drought areas in the southwest.
originally posted by: NightVision
a reply to: MPoling
It's bewildering to think that in the U.S. we build massive oil pipelines that span the country. But we can't build water pipelines to catch the excessive snowmelt from the east to carry it into the drought areas in the southwest.
originally posted by: MPoling
Im sure there is no long term effects right? I mean the post does say its better than using chemicals, does that mean they used chemicals prior?
originally posted by: Akaspeedy
Not sure why they need to bother…I spend most of my time being driven around the U.K……i see the trails laid, get thicker, and then see grey clouds form directly underneath them and before long it starts raining……..
originally posted by: NightVision
a reply to: MPoling
It's bewildering to think that in the U.S. we build massive oil pipelines that span the country. But we can't build water pipelines to catch the excessive snowmelt from the east to carry it into the drought areas in the southwest.