It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Could it be a ruse to demand quarantines and masks and shut downs again ?? đŽ
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
If you have anti-bodies, you should be good to go. I went to LabCorp and took an anti-body test, just so I have the written proof that Covid-19 antibodies are present.
originally posted by: sled735
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
If you have anti-bodies, you should be good to go. I went to LabCorp and took an anti-body test, just so I have the written proof that Covid-19 antibodies are present.
I trust the tests as much as I trust the jab. NONE!
I've read that some tests give a false/positive in order to manipulate the numbers. I've even read that some of the tests have the virus on them so the person gets it.
That may be a conspiracy theory, but I trust nothing our government has it's hands in regarding this virus.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
If you have anti-bodies, you should be good to go. I went to LabCorp and took an anti-body test, just so I have the written proof that Covid-19 antibodies are present.
I trust the tests as much as I trust the jab. NONE!
I've read that some tests give a false/positive in order to manipulate the numbers. I've even read that some of the tests have the virus on them so the person gets it.
That may be a conspiracy theory, but I trust nothing our government has it's hands in regarding this virus.
The Covid-19 antibody test is reliable. They take a vial of blood, send it to the lab, and 3 days later you get a detailed report explaining if you have, or do not have, Covid-19 antibodies.
As a Military Veteran, my test was free. Most are eligible for a free Covid-19 antibody test.
More info here: www.labcorp.com...
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
If you have anti-bodies, you should be good to go. I went to LabCorp and took an anti-body test, just so I have the written proof that Covid-19 antibodies are present.
I trust the tests as much as I trust the jab. NONE!
I've read that some tests give a false/positive in order to manipulate the numbers. I've even read that some of the tests have the virus on them so the person gets it.
That may be a conspiracy theory, but I trust nothing our government has it's hands in regarding this virus.
The Covid-19 antibody test is reliable. They take a vial of blood, send it to the lab, and 3 days later you get a detailed report explaining if you have, or do not have, Covid-19 antibodies.
As a Military Veteran, my test was free. Most are eligible for a free Covid-19 antibody test.
More info here: www.labcorp.com...
originally posted by: carewemust
If vaccines stop, the wimps who run this country will implement another nationwide lockdown. Will Americans forcefully resist this time? Hope so. I'm ready!
while we know money was behind all this, we also seen how much of the nations in the world also went along with it.
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Well, the FD&C Act should allow for anyone to refuse the jab with no repercussions.....unfortunately not many people even know this Act exists.
Oddly, it also puts all power of grants and funds under the Director of NAID....and that is Fauci.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act
Scope of Immunity from Liability
For the PREP Act to apply, the Secretary must determine that a disease or other threat to health
constitutes a public health emergency, or that there is a credible risk of such an emergency.311 The
Secretary shall consider the desirability of encouraging the design, development, testing,
manufacture, and use of countermeasures in determining whether to issue a PREP Act
declaration.312 The Secretary must publish the PREP Act declaration in the Federal Register and
identify, for each countermeasure, the particular disease, time period, population, and
geographical area that the declaration covers.313
If within the scope of the declaration, the PREP Act immunizes a covered person from legal
liability for all claims for loss relating to the administration or use of a covered
countermeasure.314 The requirements for PREP Act immunity thus break down into four elements:
(1) the individual or entity must be a âcovered personâ;
(2) the legal claim must be for a âlossâ;
(3) the loss must have a âcausal relationshipâ to the administration or use of a covered
countermeasure; and
(4) the medical product that caused the loss must be a âcovered
countermeasure.â
âCovered Personsâ
The PREP Act defines covered persons to include (i) the United States; (ii) manufacturers and
distributors of covered countermeasures; (iii) âprogram plannersâ; and (iv) âqualified personsâ
who prescribe, administer, or dispense covered countermeasures.315 Program planners include
Indian Tribes, state governments, and local governments who supervise programs that dispense,
distribute, or administer covered countermeasures, or provide policy guidance, facilities, andscientific advice on the administration or use of such countermeasures.316 Qualified persons
include licensed health professionals and other individuals authorized to prescribe, administer, or
dispense covered countermeasures under state law, as well as other categories of persons
identified by the Secretary in a PREP Act declaration.317 Employees and agents of all these
persons and entities are also covered persons.318
The declaration provides
PREP Act immunity âwithout geographic limitationâ beginning on February 4, 2020, and ending
as late as October 1, 2025
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: sled735
a reply to: network dude
Yes, I agree. I have been getting upset when I go to the doctor and he gets angry because I refuse to take the jab. I told him it's because I had the virus and got over it naturally; I have the antibodies without the "vaccine". He argues that I can get it again.
Well, so can people who took the shot, so what's the real motive?
I believe anyone who had the virus already should have the same freedoms as people who take the shot.
What's the difference? Honest question!
If you have anti-bodies, you should be good to go. I went to LabCorp and took an anti-body test, just so I have the written proof that Covid-19 antibodies are present.
I trust the tests as much as I trust the jab. NONE!
I've read that some tests give a false/positive in order to manipulate the numbers. I've even read that some of the tests have the virus on them so the person gets it.
That may be a conspiracy theory, but I trust nothing our government has it's hands in regarding this virus.
The Covid-19 antibody test is reliable. They take a vial of blood, send it to the lab, and 3 days later you get a detailed report explaining if you have, or do not have, Covid-19 antibodies.
As a Military Veteran, my test was free. Most are eligible for a free Covid-19 antibody test.
More info here: www.labcorp.com...
Authorizes any physician, registered nurse, or practical nurse whose license or certification expired within the past five years to prescribe, dispense and/or administer COVID-19 vaccines in any state or U.S. territory so long as the license or certification was active and in good standing prior to the date it went inactive.
originally posted by: Nothin
Geeeezzzee !!
Why do these Backdoor-Doctors⢠hate Science⢠so much ?
Do they not know that these most-awesome greatest Jibber-Jabbers⢠have been highly incredibly, and thoroughly tested for a full couple of weeks before they were issued ?
Do they not know that every single person participating in the Experimentâ˘, gets a nurses visit every two days, and a Doctors⢠visit once a week after the Jibber-Jabber⢠?
Do they not know that the wonderful and competent Science⢠Authorities⢠are doing the full blood-work, checking pulse and heart-stress, cognitive-testing, motor-function testing, and a full battery of tests, to assure that every single person who took the Jibber-Jabber⢠is closely followed, for any potential anomaly ?
Do they think that folks are just being stabbed like cattle, told to have a coffee and doughnut as they wait, while a supposed nurse's assistant is supposed to be watching them, but is really watching her phone, then they're given the bum's-rush to skedaddle, and told : " Remember : if anything goes wrong, anything at all ; it's NOT the Jibber-Jabberâ˘. " ?
What have some people got against Science⢠?
originally posted by: MiaBandetoh
America's Frontline Doctors???
NOT THOSE QUACKS AGAIN! I wouldn't let a single one of those so called doctors recommend anything to me.
And just to be clear I am anti-Covid vaccination but first,
Let me make sure my dreamdemon is not reading this!
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: Vasa Croe
And a really odd ammendment to the PREP Act from Jan 2021 is this part:
Authorizes any physician, registered nurse, or practical nurse whose license or certification expired within the past five years to prescribe, dispense and/or administer COVID-19 vaccines in any state or U.S. territory so long as the license or certification was active and in good standing prior to the date it went inactive.
HHS gov
So unlicensed "professionals" are allowed to administer unlicensed "vaccines" without repercussions if something happens as well....LOL!