It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pro Trump Social Network Hacked on Launch Day and is fighting with Furries

page: 18
23
<< 15  16  17   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2021 @ 11:14 PM
link   
a reply to: NotGuilty

Star for you.



posted on Jul, 8 2021 @ 11:16 PM
link   

edit on 8-7-2021 by NotGuilty because: (no reason given)


Damn....I had a really funny comeback for that guy. But since you gave me a star I’ll let him think of his own.
What can I say. I love to laugh with people.
edit on 8-7-2021 by NotGuilty because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2021 @ 11:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Are you lost?

No, you are. As your futile daily thrashings on ATS clearly show.

Note the vintage of my membership. No lurking, no bannings, no leaving and coming back under a different name. I know my way here (and my way around here) pretty well, thank you very much.

I also know when to step away -- which, I would guess, is more than you do.



Ok.

I'll step back into my 'place' now.

Don't want to trigger anymore rage from such a 'vintage' member.



Care to explain this:

"That’s free speech, Mary. Free speech for red-blooded, white-skinned, blue-eyed Americans. As God and the Founders intended"


Sounds an awful like chans.

And nothing like either ATS, or what gettr folks had in mind.



posted on Jul, 9 2021 @ 08:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Or sending furry brownshirt army to obnoxiously disrupt movie, forcing theater to close?

Exactly. Any activity that seeks to stop others from expressing themselves by force is suppression of free speech. As long as people have the ability to speak their minds freely, they have free speech.

That includes censorship. Obviously, the government passing legislation that refuses to allow speech of any kind is suppression of free speech; it is nation-wide and applies to all forums. A group with enough control of a medium could be guilty of suppression of free speech, such as in the debate concerning the apparently coordinated actions of Facebook, Twitter, and Google. A single entity which does not control an entire medium, such as ATS, cannot be guilty of suppression of free speech. ATS does not have the power, as a single site with competition, to do so.

Indeed, the three giants mentioned above could not suppress free speech as long as they have effective competition. The problem is that Facebook, Twitter, and Google have an effective monopoly on social media at this time. Collectively they have no serious competition. As an established monopoly, any action to stifle competition in any way, such as preventing continued Internet access to start-ups like GETTR, is a major problem and should be shut down by the government under anti-trust law. When that does not happen, we have suppression of free speech, as well as an oligarchy on Internet communication.

It's really no different than having a single movie theater in an area which actively prevents the issuance of permits to build or operate another theater, then decides they will only play "Tinkerbell" movies. I'm sure those trying to excuse the hacking of GETTR would be outraged should that happen in their area.

TheRedneck



posted on Jul, 10 2021 @ 07:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Are you lost?

No, you are. As your futile daily thrashings on ATS clearly show.

Note the vintage of my membership. No lurking, no bannings, no leaving and coming back under a different name. I know my way here (and my way around here) pretty well, thank you very much.

I also know when to step away -- which, I would guess, is more than you do.



Ok.

I'll step back into my 'place' now.

Don't want to trigger anymore rage from such a 'vintage' member.



Care to explain this:

"That’s free speech, Mary. Free speech for red-blooded, white-skinned, blue-eyed Americans. As God and the Founders intended"


Sounds an awful like chans.

And nothing like either ATS, or what gettr folks had in mind.





Funny.

I stepped back into my 'proper place' for a while and you went into hiding instead of continuing the discussion.

Maybe your only goal was to suppress discussion in the first place?

Censorship.

By any means necessary, right?

Even your words like this:


"That’s free speech, Mary. Free speech for red-blooded, white-skinned, blue-eyed Americans. As God and the Founders intended"


Disgusting.



posted on Jul, 10 2021 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Nunyabizisit


Are you lost?

No, you are. As your futile daily thrashings on ATS clearly show.

Note the vintage of my membership. No lurking, no bannings, no leaving and coming back under a different name. I know my way here (and my way around here) pretty well, thank you very much.

I also know when to step away -- which, I would guess, is more than you do.



How do you really feel?



posted on Jul, 10 2021 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
''Oh, somewhere in this favoured land the sun is shining bright,
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light;
And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout,
But there is no joy in Trumpville—mighty GETTR has struck out.''



And still not a single democrat here willing to denounce political censorship.

You must be so proud.

Of democrat's brainwashing.




edit on 10-7-2021 by Nunyabizisit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2021 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

That post was in agreement with you.



posted on Jul, 12 2021 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

That post was in agreement with you.



Wasn't meant for you.

I screwed up the quote sequence.





new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 15  16  17   >>

log in

join