It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex-government chief for UFO investigations: US considering extraterrestrial hypothesis

page: 3
13
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2021 @ 01:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

Totally agree...it will impact all interests of life. Some people who hear the news arent good people and will activelt try to take advamtage of the situation. Personally its concerning, but info have some hope if something does get announced



posted on Jun, 18 2021 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: vlawde
a reply to: Blue Shift

Personally I think it would be good for us. Get out of our rut and have at least a tenuous understanding of the big picture.





I would like to agree, and yet I cannot help but point out how something as "terrestrial" as the COVID pandemic demonstrated how our civilization responds to an imposed revision of our "worldview"; not too well, to be honest.

Being in a "rut" it would seem, makes all so much easier to keep one's head in the sand and deny that which has the ability to kick one in the buttocks!



posted on Jun, 19 2021 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Arbitrageur

I am not talking about Google Moon. I am talking about the purposeful smeared an d erased images that are so prevalent in the history of Moon images released by NASA. The point is, why were they smeared in the first place. They are so obvious and there is so much talk about them, that I guess you will have to dig some up yourself if you do not know what I am talking about.



posted on Jun, 19 2021 @ 03:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: charlyv
They are so obvious and there is so much talk about them, that I guess you will have to dig some up yourself if you do not know what I am talking about.
That would seem rather pointless since you could just say the example I found which has already been discussed is not what you're talking about either.

The only way I can know if it's what you are talking about is for you to provide the example. If you have no example handy or no interest in pursuing the question you raised, it can't be as important as you claim.



posted on Jun, 20 2021 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Silcone Synapse

You might interpret it in another way. Why, for example, do millions of people go missing every year, many never being found? Perhaps that earth-based intelligence entirely unknown to humans has the answer.



posted on Jun, 21 2021 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Quartet
a reply to: Silcone Synapse

You might interpret it in another way. Why, for example, do millions of people go missing every year, many never being found? Perhaps that earth-based intelligence entirely unknown to humans has the answer.

Hardly millions, unless you're like to missing children advocates who lump in all the child custody battles where one kid gets whisked away by one of the parents or some poor old dude with Alzheimer's who wanders away and falls into a river. Maybe a few thousand disappearances, at the very most. Somebody goes missing, they search the woods. It happens infrequently enough that it makes the news. Do we see it every day on the news? No.



posted on Jun, 21 2021 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Quartet
a reply to: Silcone Synapse[/qoute]

Here are the USA numbers for 2020



edit on 21-6-2021 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2021 @ 11:16 PM
link   

edit on 21-6-2021 by charlyv because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-6-2021 by charlyv because: duplicate post



posted on Jun, 21 2021 @ 11:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arbitrageur

originally posted by: charlyv
They are so obvious and there is so much talk about them, that I guess you will have to dig some up yourself if you do not know what I am talking about.
That would seem rather pointless since you could just say the example I found which has already been discussed is not what you're talking about either.

The only way I can know if it's what you are talking about is for you to provide the example. If you have no example handy or no interest in pursuing the question you raised, it can't be as important as you claim.


Very well, here are two of my favorites.

The first is from 50 or so years ago and shows the airbrushing but left out a few side details.



The second , I do not have the date but the 2 airbrushed areas that could be towers, are rather 0bvious.




It is rather blatant, that they did not want these identified, would you agree?
edit on 22-6-2021 by charlyv because: spelling , where caught



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join