New York opens criminal investigation into Trump Organisation.

originally posted by: DaymanSalvort
Trump's longtime tax attorney Sheri Dillon was also deposed but the state says she declined to answer certain questions.

certificate attestation

What was the point of that link you provided?

a reply to: Annee

Evidence of it being stopped? Most would provide a link or 2 to show what they posted is facutal not opinion based off of msm tripe. Go ahead and believe the same people who gave us Weapons of Mass Destruction, Gulf of Tonkin, etc etc, no one can stop what you think but at least post some evidence to back up your proclamations or otherwise it is just an opinion and everyone has one just like a dairy air. So now that you have posted this outrageous claim that it was stopped please provide evidence of that occurring.

originally posted by: ltdan08
If that's the case, I imagine the statute of limitations has well run out by now.

Have they? Maybe you should tell the prosecutors. Also, there's no statute of limitations in seeking tax fraud restitution.

Can I predict that the democrats will break yet another law by bringing charges against him anyway?

What law would that be?

a reply to: olaru12

Who says this it is just rumers.
pakistanjobsbanks.com...

a reply to: theatreboy

Why ?

and then . . . [tense violin sound] all-of-a-sudden . . . [ta da !!] up jumped a turkey 🤣🤣

This reminds me of the last "Billions" episode, where the State SDNY prosecutor gets removed for going after all the people he despises. Using an official office for vendettas.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: alldaylong

They should open a probe into Trump Steaks and Trump Wine, anyone who eats burnt steak and doesn't drink definitely needs to be investigated.

As to this, if they were pulling real estate shenanigans by overinflating values to secure loans it will be pretty easy to prove.

It also doesn't matter; the bank does their own appraisal and is the ultimate say in if it's a risk they want to take. The banks are not mad at trump; he hasn't defaulted on anything, and he has made good on the payments he primised to make good on. The Banks aren't saying anything criminal happened. That sort of criminal investigation would be to protect the bank, no? But the bank didn't lose -- did it?