It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
New Zealand’s highest court ruled recently that the Government’s provisional approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine known as BNT162b2 was of concern or “problematic.” Hence the Health Minister now must make a technical change to the law based on the case of the Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Ihu Medical Action Society’s (KTI) lawsuit against the New Zealand Minister of Health argued in Wellington recently. Last Tuesday, Judge Rebecca Ellis issued the court’s decision, declaring, “It is reasonably arguable that the decision to provisionally approve the vaccine for much wider use is problematic and went beyond the powers of section 23 of the Medicines Act” of New Zealand. Of concern, in this case, is safety and the public confidence in the mRNA-based vaccine.
The plaintiff argued that in fact the vaccine was already approved by the Health Ministry for over two-thirds of the entire nation’s population, despite the fact that the primary Phase 3 clinical trial for the investigational product was still ongoing and not done until April 2023.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
I am sure it is possible that none of those cases were vaccine related
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
I have had my personal battles with vaccines so I am extremely cautious. Perhaps, they should be doing a better job of assessing people before just blindly vaccinating them.
That is just how I see it.