Infra Red Footage Of Yowie (Aussie Bigfoot) - Very Compelling!

a reply to: Randyvine

You

I find it amusing that for fifty years scientists with new technology
have not been able to debunk the Patterson film

Then discredit what I actually posted.

And the staged film has not lead to any conclusive evidence bigfeet exist.
So the whole conclusion is on what? Someone either reinforced the foot of a costume, or not.

Is the feet of the costume even fully visible in the video. Looking forward to your screen shot of the feet of the costume from the video? Or your referring to footprints after the fact? If I am wrong. Looking forward to your posted screenshot of the video. And the foot/ feet.


So. Let me get this straight. Two guys somehow surprise Bigfoot, so that Bigfoot looks at them and keeps walking? With no change in posture? An aggressive animal sees “threats” in the area, and keeps walking with no change in posture?

Deer, when they smell a person audibly snort and run off.

If you surprise a deer by being up upwind to them, they will stand and stair at you when they see you move. Stomping their hooves, moving their head sided to side. Until they feel threatened, snort, and run off. Deer are actually very curious in nature.

But a big territorial Bigfoot that you imply kills children sees to men, keeps waking, with no change in posture. Showing no natural curiosity at all. With no effort to duck for cover to conceal itself? With the two guys making no effort to chase after the animal for more footage.

The whole thing smells of staged.

So. Your just going to ignore this exchange...


originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: FingerMan

Well here's your little people
leprechauns hobbits w/e.

And unicorns? Let's see oh yes I remember. Turns out that's how the
rhinoceros was referred to in the past. When the word rhinoceros
not the animal didn't exist.

I thought a man with your extensive life experience would know these FACTS.

Try again?

I would say much of the bigfeet sightings in North America, and especially the Pacific Northwest were bears walking upright.

Thanks for pointing to the truth.

a reply to: Randyvine

And that’s not even going into a mating population to maintain its species, how such a population goes undiscovered. And there is no measurable impact / stress on the environment. Especially for such a large animal.

a reply to: neutronflux

Is the feet of the costume even fully visible in the video. Looking forward of your screen shot of the feet of the costume from the video? Or your referring to footprints after the fact? If I am wrong. Looking forward to your posted screenshot of the video. And the foot/ feet.

Did you even watch it? The whole point of the vid is to show the toes
lift at the end of each stride. So clearly what no one can deny is that
vid shows bare feet walking across a very rocky debris cluttered river
bed. You're saying the feet are part of a costume? Indicating you
don't even know what you're looking at.

I already pointed out how stupid it is for you to even dream you can
say it's a man in a suit. When even costume designers from Hollywood
say straight out. No way anyone in the world in 1967 could design a suit
like that.

If it's a man in a suit why would it have breasts and a Neandertal face
protruding Einstein?

So. Your just going to ignore this exchange...

And this just seems incoherent to me. IDK how that's even
a response to what I said. It's just weird. Nothing scientific going on
in your closed mind that's for sure. so you just continue hiding from
things that are scary. I really have no interest in proving anything to
you. Go up to Canada and prove it to yourself. Go tell the First Nations
people they been seeing a man in suit. Or an up right walking bear
thru out the entire history. lol

a reply to: Randyvine

Don’t needed to if you cannot fulfill the below..

And the staged film has not lead to any conclusive evidence bigfeet exist.
So the whole conclusion is on what? Someone either reinforced the foot of a costume, or not.

Is the feet of the costume even fully visible in the video. Looking forward to your screen shot of the feet of the costume from the video? Or your referring to footprints after the fact? If I am wrong. Looking forward to your posted screenshot of the video. And the foot/ feet.


———

The video shows a staged stunt, with the “creature” acting in no realistic manner to humans in its area.

a reply to: Randyvine

You

Nothing scientific going on
in your closed mind that's for sure. so you just continue hiding from
things that are scary. I

Blatant false narrative about me concerning you.

I have even hiked Mount Washington alone at night to see the sunrise.

Remember this post.

Big difference in visiting an area, and being in tune with that area. And understanding actual animal behavior.


Or human behavior, and finding abandoned meth labs. That is more frighting than most animals.

————

Actual refute the below. Or just go away..

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: trollz

originally posted by: oloufo
of course i know this clip. its not debunked thats right but for me it looks like a guy in a gorilla costume with sticks to let the arms look longer.

There are zoomed-in analysis videos where you can clearly see the muscles in the leg flexing as it walks. See this gif I made, for example. There's no way that's a suit.

Or the fabric of the costume moving with the leg..

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: trollz



I don’t know about you. But every time I step down, it looks like my knee blew out. And somehow the front of my knee cap becomes visible from the side without pivoting by body or leg.



Note. Added. And the back of my knees and calf billows out like it has trapped air..

———

Once its pointed out how the fabric moves like a custom. You cannot unsee it, un-argue it.

a reply to: Randyvine

So? Costume feet are evidence of Bigfoot.


Hahahaha

Poop. Hair, DNA, blood, a corpse exclusive to supposed Bigfoot is evidence of Bigfoot.


Note man made staged events. Like a video of a man in a suit that acts in no natural way to supposed threats in an animals territory.

But keep posting about vague implications of costume feet...

a reply to: neutronflux

Troll

a reply to: Randyvine

Way to debate with actual facts instead of items staged off camera.

a reply to: neutronflux

You aren't capable of a debate.

a reply to: Randyvine

Me.

Your the one that cannot or will not answer questions concerning your own material?

And the staged film has not lead to any conclusive evidence bigfeet exist.
So the whole conclusion is on what? Someone either reinforced the foot of a costume, or not.

Is the feet of the costume even fully visible in the video. Looking forward to your screen shot of the feet of the costume from the video? Or your referring to footprints after the fact? If I am wrong. Looking forward to your posted screenshot of the video. And the foot/ feet.


Asking questions about actual material presented is a better debate method than just labeling someone troll....

But you are not Asking questions though, are you...

Just your perspective..

Fake or Real ..no one can be 100% either way imo

Imo id like to think that something like this

are Smarter than us humans...

Im a believer

Happy Days

Riouz

a reply to: neutronflux

Asking questions about actual material presented is a better debate method than just labeling someone troll....

True statement! Unless the person is trolling as you are.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: neutronflux

Asking questions about actual material presented is a better debate method than just labeling someone troll....

True statement! Unless the person is trolling as you are.

Wow. Your just reinforcing your cited material is not worth citing and or referencing.

One person’s troll is another person’s exposing charlatans....

a reply to: Randyvine

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

It is not extraordinary to claim both videos as discussed in this thread are a hoax.

So, while you lack ANY adult/educated logic in your arguments, you fail to understand we have the high ground. We don't have to provide anything other than a good argument. YOU on the other hand, have to provide extraordinary evidence.

There is none. You lose. Good night.
OR
You can continue to argue with yourself. I don't give a flippy.

Like the author of this thread, you are really personally butt hurt because people do not agree with you THAT THIS IS AMAZING PROOF THAT BIG FOOT IS MY DADDY!
There is none. There never has been. And there has never been a Boogey Man either.

I'm always interested to click a thread that may have some EXTRAORDINARY evidence. But alas, disappointed again.

Don't get me wrong. I think it would be cool as all get out to have found a new species of large ape on this planet.
But I'm also not a child that let's his wishful imagination get in the way of my thoughts and beliefs. There are all kinds of names for people that do that.

And there are countless, absolutely countless, videos of BigFoot Hoaxes. The one posed in this thread is no different. Matter of fact, it is more fake than most. Wishful thinking has some believing a blurry mess of IR of a dude counts as evidence of BigFoot....

(Thought I was done with this thread, but playing whackamole is fun!)

a reply to: FingerMan

Don't get me wrong.

That is something that just can't be helped because you think
you're so smart. Not realizing you have been lied to. You don't
even understand the world you live in.

The evidence you seek is easily found if you have the balls to look.

Looking further into Dr. Ketchum's work you'll also see evidence
of what I'm telling you. That you are being lied to. And for me
lying to the blind is a pretty chicken sh!t thing to do.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: FingerMan

Don't get me wrong.

That is something that just can't be helped because you think
you're so smart. Not realizing you have been lied to. You don't
even understand the world you live in.

The evidence you seek is easily found if you have the balls to look.

What, more discussion of how costumes are made.

a reply to: neutronflux

How can you move on you haven't even figured out it isn't a costume yet Einstein'

Baby steps

a reply to: neutronflux

Alright, we now know it is cruel and unusual treatment to continue. I think it's safe to say there is something very obviously wrong here, without saying it out loud. We should just move onto the next accident.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: neutronflux

How can you move on you haven't even figured out it isn't a costume yet Einstein'

Baby steps

Sorry. This is a pants leg of a costume.



Especially when the fronts of the pants ruffles and shifts / flips to the side in a way unnatural to muscles.