I'm sure many of you have heard about the privacy issues related to Gmail, and I didn't find a thread in a search other than for Gmail invites, so I
figured I'd start this one based on the privacy issues, and the possibility of making a big database full of profiles of internet users based on
Google searches and emails.
You can find a fairly exhaustive website on the apparent problems associated with Gmail at
Google-watch.org.
One of the problems is that the service uses keyword ads like Google does, and so to place these ads effectively, it has to scan the emails for
keywords, which supposedly is a huge privacy risk. Google says that it is all automated and there is no human involvement in the scanning. But it's
not just Gmail that scans emails, because any service that scans for spam or scans for viruses has to go through the emails, so if they're doing it
too, why aren't they under the same level of scrutiny?
At this link you'll find information about the "immortal cookie" that Google and Gmail
employs. If you use this stored search information and the emails and keywords from Google, you could potentially make a whole database full of
profiles. Do you think this is likely to be happening? I'm interested to know what people think on the subject. (As for the problem with the cookie,
you can just set the cookies to be cleaned on browser close, so that a new ID is issued every time, thus getting around the ID number being related to
your searches.)
Another 'conspiracy' you could accuse Google of can be represented in a paragraph from the first link I posted:
After 180 days in the U.S., email messages lose their status as a protected communication under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and become
just another database record. This means that a subpoena instead of a warrant is all that's needed to force Google to produce a copy. Other countries
may even lack this basic protection, and Google's databases are distributed all over the world. Since the Patriot Act was passed, it's unclear
whether this ECPA protection is worth much anymore in the U.S., or whether it even applies to email that originates from non-citizens in other
countries.
The "crime" that Google is seemingly committing is encouraging users to keep their email so that it is more readily available, but I don't think
this is limited to just Gmail users. As email accounts get bigger and bigger, people are going to naturally keep more and more of their email, past
this 180 day period, its logical to not delete the emails if you don't need to. Hotmail's paid account gives a user 2 gigabytes of storage space,
but I don't see that getting the accusations that Gmail is getting. Suppose I email someone who's using a Gmail account, they could keep that copy
in their account for years, and so even if I deleted it from my account, there would still be a copy that's accessible. Now, suppose I email someone
using a paid Hotmail account, they have twice as much space and so could keep my email for twice as long, but it isn't just limited to a paid
account, because the free account gives you 250 MB, so most people could keep the email for a very long time anyway. So even if I email someone using
Hotmail to avoid the "problem" that Gmail has, the user has the same likelihood of deleting it as they would have if they were using a Gmail
account, so this so-called problem with Gmail is flawed. But that's just my opinion. I put it to you: are Google purposefully trying to keep emails
from being deleted in order to build this database?
Phew.. thanks for reading! lol