Finally! Forensic Election Audit in Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
When NYC announced that each voter could choose up to 6 candidates on the Mayoral ballot, you just knew confusion would result. Perhaps by design.

Yup! That may be what the secret meeting was about... oh the jaw clenching and hair pulling that must have gone on! (Or maybe that's just in my imagination...) But they definitely had to fix something in private.

I don't think Eric Adams believes their explanation either.

NYC violent crime rate is already climbing fast. If the mayoral election begins to look like crooks are in charge, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers will let their animal nature come forth, uninhibited.

You forgot to blame Biden.

Message from your handlers: Keep on message.

originally posted by: Boadicea
"DISASTER: NYC Elections Are So Corrupt that Even Insane Far-Left Mayor De Blasio is Calling for an Audit"

Doesn't he mean "fraudit?" Isn't that what "audit" means these days? At least I see a couple people in this thread saying so, so it much be right. Eh?

I think now we see the dangers of using untrue words before we've thought out the consequences of said action.

a reply to: alphabetaone

Actually that orange object is every color but orange. Sunlight (white light) is every color combined . What we see as the color of an object is the one color that was not absorbed by the object. It was the color that was reflected.

So the orange is everything but orange. We only see the color that was reflected. The one color that it isn't.

Originally posted by: alphabetaone
"So, im left wondering are we dealing with a few droplets of water in our voter tank, or 15 to 20% intrusion? The latter being serious, the former being mostly inconsequential.

I think any reasonable US citizen would find 15 to 20% voter fraud completely unacceptable, but a few droplets? I dont know, i can live with that much."



So, you're saying, in essence, a lot of murder is all right, but maybe just a murder here and there is acceptable? What if you were one of the "acceptable" murders? Would you still think that was all right?

There is no "acceptable" amount of breaking the law.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

So the orange is everything but orange. We only see the color that was reflected. The one color that it isn't.

Almost. The Frequency of light that reflects off the object more than the other frequencies. And your vision will only detect light in a certain frequency range. Electromagnetic waves. Microwaves are just different frequencies, for example.

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: carewemust
If the mayoral election begins to look like crooks are in charge, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers will let their animal nature come forth, uninhibited.

No we wont, dont act like you know anything about us.

Your reaction to my post was rather primal. Are you sure you're not in the hundreds of thousands I referred to?

Sorry Care, I also found your post more than a little over the top.

Have been trying to come up with a creative way to respond, but I guess this is it.

OK... I'll lower the number to "tens of thousands" will feel free (lowered inhibition/restraint) to release their violent and/or criminal nature, if NYC leadership are revealed to be corrupt crooks. Is that better?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
When NYC announced that each voter could choose up to 6 candidates on the Mayoral ballot, you just knew confusion would result. Perhaps by design.

Yup! That may be what the secret meeting was about... oh the jaw clenching and hair pulling that must have gone on! (Or maybe that's just in my imagination...) But they definitely had to fix something in private.

I don't think Eric Adams believes their explanation either.

NYC violent crime rate is already climbing fast. If the mayoral election begins to look like crooks are in charge, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers will let their animal nature come forth, uninhibited.

You forgot to blame Biden.

Message from your handlers: Keep on message.

Because "the buck" stops at the top of the Democratic party, and Biden declared himself the leader of the party, along with cancelling major crime reduction programs, there's no need to spell out that he (and his administration) are responsible.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
When NYC announced that each voter could choose up to 6 candidates on the Mayoral ballot, you just knew confusion would result. Perhaps by design.

Yup! That may be what the secret meeting was about... oh the jaw clenching and hair pulling that must have gone on! (Or maybe that's just in my imagination...) But they definitely had to fix something in private.

I don't think Eric Adams believes their explanation either.

NYC violent crime rate is already climbing fast. If the mayoral election begins to look like crooks are in charge, hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers will let their animal nature come forth, uninhibited.

You forgot to blame Biden.

Message from your handlers: Keep on message.

Lol
You lot tried to handle us.
We rubbed your limey faces in it.
Happy Independence Day!!!
Make like Cornwallis and surrender.

Not sure if this has been posted
Republican senators in Pennsylvania briefed on 2020 election audit plan

Republican senators in Pennsylvania were briefed on a plan for an audit of the 2020 election.

The private briefing, conducted by state Sen. Doug Mastriano on Wednesday, is the clearest sign yet that lawmakers in the Keystone State are serious about fulfilling the wishes of former President Donald Trump and his supporters who are pressing for copycats of a controversial audit in Arizona.

Mastriano even obtained legal advice from a Philadelphia-based law firm about the GOP caucus using private money to pay for consultants and lawyers.

“While we cannot predict how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would decide the issue, in our opinion, to a reasonable degree of legal certainty, Pennsylvania law does not prohibit the Caucus or Committee from accepting or benefiting from such financial support,” lawyer Bruce Marks wrote in a letter, a copy of which was obtained by the Associated Press.

a reply to: Vector99

Pennsylvania Senators penned an official statement 7 months ago (Dec 2020) citing a severe "over vote" irregularity.

Source: www.repdiamond.com... or

Yet they're still "thinking" about executing a detailed audit of the ballots. 🤪

a reply to: shooterbrody

Bro, I’m a long time ally..but it’s just cringeworthy watching conservative tough guys talk about the days of old when we’re getting our asses handed to us by antifa soybois.
The French are laughing at us. Take that in.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

Doesn't he mean "fraudit?" Isn't that what "audit" means these days? At least I see a couple people in this thread saying so, so it much be right. Eh?

I think now we see the dangers of using untrue words before we've thought out the consequences of said action.

It would seem audit vs fraudit is in the eye of the beholder, eh?

On the other hand, if fraud is found... especially major widespread fraud... then in a way, it is a "fraudit," just not the way they want us to believe now. An audit that finds fraud -- "Fraudit." Much like Old Joey's bestest Election Fraud Organization ever!!!

It's all in the eye of the beholder!

a reply to: Vector99

Thank you for posting the link! I haven't seen that yet...

Moving forward, slowly but surely. It's progress.

Perhaps we can call it "progressive" in its own way, eh? Let's just turn ALL their buzzwords right back against them!

Lots to post again... And I want to start with this one, because this very thought has been increasingly on my mind. For all the talk about left/right, liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican in terms of the audit(s), this is much closer to the truth, and this moment of truth is getting closer:

RNC Backs 2020 Election Fraud and Steal Then Thinks Americans Will Support Them in Future – Not A Chance

When all is done and said and known, unless the audit finds no fraud and no wrongdoing of any kind (and I do not believe that will happen), the Republicans who have backed the election fraud -- and not the truth -- will be in the exact same boat as the Democrats. Whether those Pubs supported it before, during or after, or all of the above. The Democrats did not do this alone. The Pubs are and will be seen just as guilty and judged just as harshly as Dems.

Which brings me to my next link:

Two Arizona ‘Republican’ State Senators Kill Election Integrity Bill Before Adjournment (VIDEO)

One of the two Senators is the same Senator who first co-sponsored a resolution to arrest County officials for not handing over the subpoenaed election materials, then changed his vote when push came to shove. The other Senator is running for Secretary of State and objected to the chain of custody clause specifically:

Ugenti-Rita told Townsend that if she removed the chain of custody clauses that she would vote yes with Republicans. Ugenti-Rita claimed that Townsend went around her with these chain of custody clauses.

State Senator Townsend told The Gateway Pundit that Ugenti-Rita was “hellbent on getting those portions out” and wonders why.

That Secretary of State field of candidates is getting rather crowded. But Mark Finchem, from the AZ House of Reps is also a candidate and supports the audit. He'll have my vote.

I have a damn good feeling this is all about to come out.

Lots from Georgia, and speaking of chain of custody:

Report: Over 168,000 Ballots Missing Chain of Custody in Cobb County, GA
(Remember, Biden won the entire state with about 11,000 votes...)

GA Gubernatorial Candidate Vernon Jones Launches ‘Contract With Georgia’

This is a great start and foundation for Vernon Jones' candidacy for Governor.

I've been saying for years that we need another Contract with America, but this time a Contract for America, wherein we the people make our demands and promise to vote for ONLY those candidates that pledge to do so... And it gets better:

The Trojan Horse Legal Case That Could Flip The US Senate Red

“The Trump cases had to have proof before engaging in discovery in order to challenge the results, but there was so little time. The system is simply rigged to permit fraud to flourish and succeed. But we have had the luxury of time. We’ve had time to lay the groundwork to go after everyone, and this will surely include the outrageous Stacey Abrams consent decree, the astonishing Dominion agreement, and potentially Dominion itself. “Voters” who were not registered to vote or did not vote in November suddenly voted in January. That was also illegal, and we are going to bring all this to light and hold the actors accountable.”

Daugherty quietly filed his case on a Sunday night in January. Biding his time, his team has held their fire until now. But then Perkins Coie, known as the Democrat storm lawyers of election mayhem, parachuted into the Daugherty case.

“With the recent ruling that takes the case out of Fulton, things will start moving fast. The impetus of this case is not political, nor for either side. It’s simply about free and fair elections. We cannot survive as a nation with voter fraud, systemic fraud and national distrust of election integrity. This destruction of American democracy has to be stopped.”

Who Printed Ballots for Fulton County, GA and Why Is It Important?

They were printed by Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix, Arizona, but there is something very suspicious about these particular ballots.

Who filed a U.S. Patent Application for a computer system for “on-screen ballot duplication” to be used for “generating a revised ballot”?

According to application # 20190311030, Kevin Runbeck did...

Mr. Runbeck also made several contributions to Biden and the Dems, all screenshotted at the link. And there's more. Well worth a read, but a lot to take in and process...

One more with lots to take in and process:

EXCLUSIVE: The National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) Worked with the UN, Twitter, State Govts and Non-profits to Prevent Free Speech and Impact the 2020 US Election

Foreign election interference comes in lots of forms...

originally posted by: Arnie123
I have a damn good feeling this is all about to come out.

I'm inclined to agree. Something is about to burst.

From your keyboard fingers to God's ears...

originally posted by: NotGuilty
a reply to: shooterbrody

Bro, I’m a long time ally..but it’s just cringeworthy watching conservative tough guys talk about the days of old when we’re getting our asses handed to us by antifa soybois.
The French are laughing at us. Take that in.

You watch too much tv.
That is not the case everwhere.
The media would have you believe such tho.
The French are only laughing at the English like they always do.
Happy Independence Day!

This is a question I believe both party members need to ask themselves (about their own party):

AMERI CAN QUAGMIRE: Do Americans Support the Republican Party which Has Leaders in the Cabal of Corruption, or Do They Separate Themselves from the Corruption?

There has been plenty of left/right/liberal/conservative/Dem/pub discussion and debate in this thread, on the forum, and the entire country.

Again and again, voters divide themselves by party... it must be good/bad because it's my/their party... your guys are lying liars and cheating cheaters but my guys aren't... opinions by my party are good but opinion pieces by your party are bad.

When/if the fraud/tampering/interference comes to light, it won't be just one party or the other implicated. It will be both parties.

And the voters need to be prepared to think long and hard about how they have judged the other party while empowering their own guilty parties in the process.

Then the really important question: What do WE do about it???