It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Hmmm. Now the women who wore veils were more prone to respiratory problems. But what caused the problems is what is not addressed. It could be they are trapping the ketone laden perfumes in the veil and breathing more in, which can have negative effects. It could be the women were more prone to allergies to begin with so tried using the veils to help curtail the allergies while those who could breath well didn't need to block the dusts and pollens or whatever.
There could be multiple causations for these diseases, I could not link to a full research to find out how and why the test was done. There was a rise in numbers, but not really that much, maybe one in ten thousand to three in a thousand, that would mean thirty in ten thousand vs three in ten thousand. Like I mentioned, this is not a causual test, it is just association.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Hmmm. Now the women who wore veils were more prone to respiratory problems. But what caused the problems is what is not addressed. It could be they are trapping the ketone laden perfumes in the veil and breathing more in, which can have negative effects. It could be the women were more prone to allergies to begin with so tried using the veils to help curtail the allergies while those who could breath well didn't need to block the dusts and pollens or whatever.
There could be multiple causations for these diseases, I could not link to a full research to find out how and why the test was done. There was a rise in numbers, but not really that much, maybe one in ten thousand to three in a thousand, that would mean thirty in ten thousand vs three in ten thousand. Like I mentioned, this is not a causual test, it is just association.
originally posted by: dontneedaname
originally posted by: rickymouse
Hmmm. Now the women who wore veils were more prone to respiratory problems. But what caused the problems is what is not addressed. It could be they are trapping the ketone laden perfumes in the veil and breathing more in, which can have negative effects. It could be the women were more prone to allergies to begin with so tried using the veils to help curtail the allergies while those who could breath well didn't need to block the dusts and pollens or whatever.
There could be multiple causations for these diseases, I could not link to a full research to find out how and why the test was done. There was a rise in numbers, but not really that much, maybe one in ten thousand to three in a thousand, that would mean thirty in ten thousand vs three in ten thousand. Like I mentioned, this is not a causual test, it is just association.
I can tell you after wearing a mask for 5 hours straight....I have irritation in my throat....or more burning sensation at times. And more gunk in my nose. And I sneeze, where as otherwise I would never sneeze. Yes, clean mask.
www.naturalnews.com... ml
I'll post more soon I think re: just how useful they are historically...
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: dontneedaname
originally posted by: rickymouse
Hmmm. Now the women who wore veils were more prone to respiratory problems. But what caused the problems is what is not addressed. It could be they are trapping the ketone laden perfumes in the veil and breathing more in, which can have negative effects. It could be the women were more prone to allergies to begin with so tried using the veils to help curtail the allergies while those who could breath well didn't need to block the dusts and pollens or whatever.
There could be multiple causations for these diseases, I could not link to a full research to find out how and why the test was done. There was a rise in numbers, but not really that much, maybe one in ten thousand to three in a thousand, that would mean thirty in ten thousand vs three in ten thousand. Like I mentioned, this is not a causual test, it is just association.
I can tell you after wearing a mask for 5 hours straight....I have irritation in my throat....or more burning sensation at times. And more gunk in my nose. And I sneeze, where as otherwise I would never sneeze. Yes, clean mask.
www.naturalnews.com... ml
I'll post more soon I think re: just how useful they are historically...
Have you considered the possibility that you simply brought a cheap Chinese mask, and that you were being
irritated by chemicals on it?
For example, insecticides or fungicides used on them that aren't up to US code. It's not uncommon for products to be sprayed with something to kill bugs (Bed Bugs, for example) before transit or during storage.
Where I used to live there was a big scandal after a chemical sprayed on furniture to kill insects andor mold caused people skin burns.
originally posted by: dontneedaname
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Abstract
It is customary in clinical practice and elsewhere to put on a mask for protection against infection, dust, and so forth. The veil, which is traditionally worn by women in many Muslim countries, especially in Saudi Arabia, may have a similar effect. The study was carried out during 1998-1999 in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Adult women were asked to answer a structured questionnaire related to the occurrence of respiratory tract problems and about veil wearing. Veil wearing was practiced by 58% of the sample. Respiratory infections and asthma were significantly more common in veils users (p < 0.00001 and p < 0.0003, respectively). This unexpected finding was probably secondary to infection. More and bigger studies are recommended.
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: dug88
I get that it's sarcasm, but it's pretty well understood that sneezing & coughing disease-riddled droplets helps to spread many different viruses.
Anyone who has spent much time among the general public knows that a good portion of people don't wash their hands after pooping, nor do they put much, if any, effort into containing their coughs/sneezes.
The effectiveness of masks vs WuhanFlu / @Davos Disease, from what I've seen, doesn't impress me all that much - at least not in closed indoor airspace with too many breathers for the given volume of air.
However, you have to be an idiot to not understand ghe basic physics behind it being helpful. And I say this as someone who HATES wearing a mask. I just hope it's over by summer. It makes hot humid days even more miserable than they already are.
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: dug88
The effectiveness of masks vs WuhanFlu / @Davos Disease, from what I've seen, doesn't impress me all that much - at least not in closed indoor airspace with too many breathers for the given volume of air.
However, you have to be an idiot to not understand ghe basic physics behind it being helpful. And I say this as someone who HATES wearing a mask. I just hope it's over by summer. It makes hot humid days even more miserable than they already are.
Now that’s more like it. We’re bacilli. How big are they? “An average bacillus is 0.5-1.0 µm wide by 1.0-4.0 µm long. ” according to Sizes, Shapes, and Arrangements of Bacteria. Looking back at our own proportions, shoulder width is about 1/4 of our height. That enables us to scale humans to bacilli heights from 2 to 4 µm (and corresponding widths of 0.5 to 1 µm). Now that’s a 100% range, so let’s put 2 µm to be equivalent of 1.20 m (and 4 µm to be 2.40 m). That puts our average 1.70 m human at 2.83 µm, so we pick the ratio to be 2.83 µm : 1.70 m ~ 1 : 600,000. Radius of Earth is about 6,000 km, so making it 600,000 times smaller puts it at 10 m. That’s just a bit more than the radius of central circle on a football pitch