Another Open Letter To My Congresman

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020, 6:30 PM Charles T wrote:

Mr. Westerman,
I wrote you last week concerning this past presidential election and
precisely what is at stake on January 6th of next year.
In reply, I received your standard form letter pertaining, where you
stated absolutely nothing.
I refuse to accept that cop out letter as being sufficient to satisfy my
concerns over this situation.

This nation was founded on Christian morality and commitment to all
things good and right in the eyes of our creator and humanity.
If you are complicit in allowing this national travesty, sir, you are no
friend of mine and our Lord will pass judgement on you all, as will I.

Sir, I want, I demand to know what your intent is for the upcoming joint
session of Congress on that date. Are you going to rise to the level of
statesmanship and patriotism to defeat this communist insurgency or are
you going to cower in the face of our enemies?

I demand to know. Yes, you will honor your oath to this nation or no,
You will quietly bite your tongue and let this great nation be consumed
by our enemies?

Simple and short. Yes, or No.

Charles T

The first letter.
The first letter

I hate to break it to you Charles, but politicians sell their souls when they take the oath. Once they're elected, we don't matter anymore.

originally posted by: HalWesten
I hate to break it to you Charles, but politicians sell their souls when they take the oath. Once they're elected, we don't matter anymore.

I wish people would understand that, the rich sure do. They stay rich because they TOO HAVE TO pay to play. Funny that people don't realize that. It's the rich that pay off the bastards to make sure they keep their wealth, if not, they'd be just as poor as us and that is the truth from my bank account after all these years.

I'd back of the religious talk and stck to facts.
Otherwise, good effort.

originally posted by: CharlesT
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020, 6:30 PM Charles T wrote:
In reply, I received your standard form letter pertaining, where you
stated absolutely nothing.

Precisely what I predicted. What has changed?

a reply to: Mandroid7

I don't back off...

He is probably a member of the First _______ Church of Hot Springs, Arkansas. It is likely his wife would frown on his offending God. I hope.

a reply to: schuyler

Nothing so far, but I'm not finished with Bruce Westerman.

I copied and posted it to Letters To The Editor, Arkansas Democrat Gazette.

a reply to: CharlesT
I commend you on trying but you must realise the chances of your actual congressman reading your letter is between nothing and zero. Letters are read and answered by underlings because they "don't want the congressman bothered by their electorate".
PS. you'd do much better to write to your congressman through a newspaper (if you can get a newspaper to do it) thereby letting everybody know in the public eye, but more importantly your congressman can't say he never had it.

a reply to: CharlesT

Did you hand deliver it as you discussed in your previous thread? I think this needs a personal touch.

a reply to: CharlesT

Better than your last letter. Much better.

But what are you trying to achieve?

By giving the guy three choices - agree with you, disagree with you, ignore you - it's easy to predict which he will go for. To give you a substantive reply means that he has to accept your rhetoric.

Next time, tone it down. Be constructive, suggest positive solutions, give him something to work with.

Better still, don't waste your time with him and go for a more local approach, either through a grass roots group that would love someone with your passion or with a local organiser for Westerman and his party, someone you'll get more purchase on.

What possible repercussions could your judgement pose to this person, I use the term loosely, judgement is God’s alone. Don’t tempt the great Iam dude. His justice will f u up.

a reply to: CharlesT