Texas lawsuit shot down by Supreme Court December 11th 2020

a reply to: daveinats
Pennsylvania did so.
Guess what happened.

originally posted by: daveinats
Well, luckily most of the morons on this thread do not know anything about the legal process. When the Supreme Court said Texas did not have standing to bring all the states court challenge, what it means (listen up morons) is that Texas cannot do everyone's work. Each state they named must file suit themselves.

I guess you didn't know that the Texas petition was basically a repackaged version of the Pennsylvania petition that had already got tossed. It's okay, most people commenting on this subject about how the Supreme Court is going to intervene are pretty ill-informed to begin with so it's not like you're alone on this.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

When the Supreme Court rejected that last lawsuit,I sorta
figured it was game over.

a reply to: mamabeth

And yet the dying dead fish continues to twitch.

originally posted by: mamabeth
When the Supreme Court rejected that last lawsuit,I sorta
figured it was game over.

It was over long before that, people just don't want to accept reality.

a reply to: Phage

Well,I am a cat at heart,I like fish.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I do accept reality,I just don't want to live in your version
of it!

a reply to: mamabeth

I'm seriously considering this thing. The boys would love it, I think.
www.flippityfish.com...

a reply to: Phage

My husband and I thought about buying that for our cat.
She already has a lot of toys all over the house.

a reply to: mamabeth

Two for the price of one.
I have three cats to command me.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire



The President has Multiple Options Left on the Table .


nationalfile.com...

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

The President has Multiple Options Left on the Table .

Options to do what? What can the president actually do? Your source does not say.

originally posted by: mamabeth
I do accept reality,I just don't want to live in your version
of it!

My version would be everyone minding their own business and staying out of each other's pockets. But instead you've got what you got.

originally posted by: asd161

The statement that Texas lacks standing would seem to implicitly overrule Massachusetts v. EPA, a case that found expanded standing for states, though in the “Climate Change” context.

"Massachusetts v. EPA" was not about one state suing another state. It was a state (several in fact) trying to get the Federal Government Environmental Protection Agency to establish rules that would Protect the Environment. The EPA said it didn't have authority to regulate CO2; Massachusetts thought it did and should act on that authority. SCOTUS was asked to decide the matter.

The issue of standing had to do with whether Mass. et al had a sufficient interest in the quality of its land, air, and water to act as a 'quasi-sovereign' for its citizens (that is a very poor descriptive wording of the issue, but IANAL). Once that was established, then the issue of whether or not CO2 should be counted as a pollutant for purposes of the Clean Air Act could be addressed.

The important thing with this election case is that the Supreme Court decision to no hear the case had nothing to do with standing State v State, but that the Supreme Court simply saw nothing in the case that merited their interest. And it has no effect on anything in Mass v EPA.

SCOTUS has no need to determine if one state can sue another - it is a known fact that they can and that SCOTUS has original jurisdiction.

SCOTUS has no need to determine if Texas can instruct any other state on how to conduct its elections - it is a known fact that they cannot and every state runs its own elections, under its own laws and procedures.

There is simply nothing there that SCOTUS could possibly have any interest in - there is nothing to argue or decide.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Well the mess we have now is your fault,not mine.You
guys wanted Biden and you got him.I have work to do
now and can't waste anymore time.

a reply to: Phage

I remember Barry Goldwater's remark "26 million Americans can't be wrong'!

But I don't remember him ever answering the question about whether 43 million Americans could be wrong or not.

(For the young ones here: 1964: Lyndon Johnson 43 million / Barry Goldwater 27 million)

originally posted by: mamabeth
You guys wanted Biden and you got him.

You must be confused, I voted for Jorgensen.

A couple comments I would like to make:

First, do not confuse a courts decision with the truth or what is right. OJ never went to jail despite more DNA evidence than there ever was against many people currently serving life sentences for murder. Why was he not convicted? IMO the courts got scared. Look at the havoc wreaked on this country just over his arrest, which was a foregone conclusion after that clown show slow motion chase.

Now we have antifa, blm, and a score of other less organized imbeciles already wreaking havoc on US soil - home grown terrorism at its finest. Yet more often than not it is allowed to continue while the DC elite throw a sickening smile at the cameras and call them 'peaceful protestors'. Once again, IMO, the courts got scared. Look at how these low forehead mouth breathing sub-humans acted when a convicted felon died of a drug overdose while being arrested for yet another felony he was committing. Or mama's sweet little baby boy who never did nothing wrong...except rob a convenience store and wave a knife a police officers.

Second, biden didn't win. That vapid blathering idiot was just a poster boy fronting the most crooked election in US history. Putting him at the top of the ticket was a calculated move, just like it was when they put him on with obiwamba. Jojo the idiot boy as VP was the smartest thing obiwamba ever did. It pretty much guaranteed no one would remove him from office knowing who was next in line. Same thing as now. In the most fraudulent election in US history it doesn't matter who is at the top of the ticket. The only reason to put jojo the idiot boy there is because very few will regret losing him when harris steps up and takes the spot for the liberal fascist regime that has been growing in congress.

When liberals tell us to stop complaining and accept the truth they are really asking us to forego democracy and accept a fraudulent election - or suffer the violence of the liberal fascist dog faced pony soldiers. There will be much yelling and posturing and so on, until the first gun-grab starts...