7 States Join Texas Lawsuit to Overturn UNCONSTITUTIONAL Election, Its Happening

originally posted by: Byrd

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: MrBadExample

originally posted by: carewemust
Today, Six of the states have upgraded their support to the level of co-Plaintiffs, with Texas and President Trump.

Source: twitter.com...

Let's be honest here. Why does anyone think the SC will even consider taking the case, much less whiz all over the rights of states to conduct elections as their legislators and officials (both Dem and Rep) see fit?

There is a better chance of Tom Petty suddenly appearing from beyond the veil and singing, presumably for the Constitution, "Dont Do Me Like That".

It's not going to happen.

They are taking the case as I posted, and Ted Cruz is on board to argue the case. He is seriously one of thee best lawyers. Have you heard him filibuster ?

"...seriously one of the best lawyers"???

There's a whole lotta legal eagles here in Texas who would disagree with that.

Lord and Savior Trump clearly thought differently of Ted a while back. Hopefully Teddy does a super good job or Trumpy Trump is going to have to come up with a new nickname for him!

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: mtnshredder

So you would prefer for the Supreme Court to throw out millions of votes and essentially take supreme control of all branches of government at every level of government?

Don’t care what their consequences are. You DO NOT make concessions when it comes to the Constitution. End of discussion. By allowing an illegal and rigged election you’re also canceling millions of votes. You get that don’t you?

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Don’t care what their consequences are. You DO NOT make concessions when it comes to the Constitution. End of discussion. By allowing an illegal and rigged election you’re also canceling millions of votes. You get that don’t you?

So you want Texas nullified too, yes?

Add Alaska to the growing number of states supporting Texas and president Trump.

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: neformore

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Don’t care what their consequences are. You DO NOT make concessions when it comes to the Constitution. End of discussion. By allowing an illegal and rigged election you’re also canceling millions of votes. You get that don’t you?

So you want Texas nullified too, yes?

I don’t want anyone’s vote voided except the votes that were in violation of constitutional laws or that were found to be fraudulent due to DVS or other fraudulent activity, If that applies to Tx, then so be it.

...and yes I’m fully aware that is not what Tx is asking for.

originally posted by: neformore

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Don’t care what their consequences are. You DO NOT make concessions when it comes to the Constitution. End of discussion. By allowing an illegal and rigged election you’re also canceling millions of votes. You get that don’t you?

So you want Texas nullified too, yes?

This is not about left, right, up or down to me. I just want our laws followed period.

a reply to: mtnshredder

Don't fret. They are being followed.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: mtnshredder

Don't fret. They are being followed.

Phhhht, yeah okay, keep telling yourself that.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Paxton is looking for a pardon. I really do not understand what you were trying to say there.

The Associated Press reported in November that Paxton is under investigation by the FBI over allegations that he abused his office in an effort to benefit a wealthy donor. That investigation came after seven senior staff members under the attorney general urged federal law enforcement in an open letter in early October to "investigate allegations [against Paxton] of improper influence, abuse of office, bribery and other potential crimes."

While this PR stunt may get Paxton a pardon, why he is still the AG of Texas is an unanswered question.

a reply to: mtnshredder

I will. And your Courts will keep telling Trump's lawyers that their challenges are laughable.

a reply to: mtnshredder

To be fair. Most of them expect Trump to end up in prison if his presidency ends in January.

Wouldnt bother TO much about their opinions.

a reply to: mtnshredder

Don’t you have to get convicted of a crime before you can receive a pardon?

Ask Richard Nixon. Here's a hint: no.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: mtnshredder

Don’t you have to get convicted of a crime before you can receive a pardon?

Ask Richard Nixon. Here's a hint: no.

Yep, you’re right, I’ll delete so I don’t add to the confusion, my bad.

a reply to: mtnshredder

Don't bother. I already quoted you.

originally posted by: mtnshredder
This is not about left, right, up or down to me. I just want our laws followed period.

So that's a yes then?

After all, Texas modified its voter laws in a similar manner to what they are now claiming is unconstitutional elsewhere.

Nice to know you aren't just wanting the states Trump lost to be ruled against.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

They are taking the case as I posted,

Source?

Apparently they have refused the case. It’s very disappointing especially since there are supposedly more conservative judges but apparently none are interested in preserving the Republic against obvious election fraud. I think they have lost the whole point of their existence.

a reply to: Drucifer

Oh please! Auto correct! Frankly I had other things to do the rest of the day. The spelling police is really a sad way to make a point. I did not see much else in your reply.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

I think they have lost the whole point of their existence.

You are welcome to your opinion. However, it does not carry the same weight as that of some others.

For various reasons.

originally posted by: carewemust
Add Alaska to the growing number of states supporting Texas and president Trump.

mobile.twitter.com...

I love radio so, back in 2012, I did an experiment. I only listened to US conservative news and talk radio during the election campaign.

It was great! So great that I'm still a Mark Levin fan. Hannity's "Stop Obama Express"? Brilliant.

There was so much focus, so much energy. By the day of the election, I was convinced that Romney would knock Obama out of the ballpark.

It's like a counterfactual Battle of Stalingrad.

The Soviets held a few yards, IIRC just forty yards, of beach on the west bank of the Volga but controlled the river. They poured men and materiel across and gained enough ground to destroy the entire German Sixth Army and, like Churchill said, "break the back of the Wehrmacht".

Trump is holding on to a tiny beachhead. All the echo chambers and all the right wing media are telling us that relief is its way, there's a magnificent flotilla, another thousand boats have just joined it, the factories all over Siberia are working flat out 24/7, millions of Americans are lining up stream across and support his counterattack. They will soon kettle the Democratic Party and break the back of the Left.

Thing is, he doesn't control the river. There is no flotilla. There are no boats. The factories are making stuff for Biden's inauguration. Millions of Americans are getting on with their lives, many of them mourning for lost loved ones or fretting over how to pay the bills in a time of uncertainty.

The only thing pouring over is money. $200 million into his legal fund. He's only spend $9 million but he an keep the rest - it's covered in the small print.