Video shows polls workers pulling out suitcases of ballots | GA election hearing.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Thiaoouba Prophecy
The coup d'etat of our beautiful Country will not go without a fight! We The People are United to show that our forefathers have not died in vain. That constitution means something. It has a cosmic power level of 500 which is the power of reason. If we lose this battle and fall into fascism/communism we will forever be ruled by the elite upper class. They have almost infinite power since the advent of the microchip. They wish to control the world with just a push of a button.

State after state has verified the elction results showing that Biden won the election.

All but one of the cases brought alleging voter fraud have been dismissed.

Americans voted for Trump and Americans voted for Biden.

Biden won.

So this video shows all that?

Must’ve missed that scene

a reply to: Mandroid7

Except that the video is not verified, no one today was under oath, etc. etc.

Let's see it taken to court.

Now, I wasn't addresssing you, and have nothing more to say to you.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

Except that the video is not verified, no one today was under oath, etc. etc.

Let's see it taken to court.

Now, I wasn't addresssing you, and have nothing more to say to you.

Weird. Hadn’t heard the EC certified yet

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

Except that the video is not verified, no one today was under oath, etc. etc.

Let's see it taken to court.

Now, I wasn't addresssing you, and have nothing more to say to you.

Weird. Hadn’t heard the EC certified yet

If EC stands for Electoral College, please quote where I claimed they have met.

If not, your comment is superfluous.

/shrug

a reply to: Gryphon66

Funny, I don’t know the election has been certified by Congress.

No one has “won.”

Just leftist news and tech companies playing make believe right now.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

Except that the video is not verified, no one today was under oath, etc. etc.

Let's see it taken to court.

Now, I wasn't addresssing you, and have nothing more to say to you.

Weird. Hadn’t heard the EC certified yet

If EC stands for Electoral College, please quote where I claimed they have met.

If not, your comment is superfluous.

/shrug

My bad.
The part where you said Biden won?

/superfluous shrug

a reply to: Gryphon66

Lmao
The video is not verified?
By who cnn?
Your statement is telling.
Very dishonest Gryphon.
You are backing cheaters because you are emotionally invested in a party, or media induced hate for Trump.
Very small-minded thinking.

Furthermore, this isn't CNN, you don't get to spout bs and shut down the comment section.

a reply to: Mandroid7

It's a public hearing. Anyone can comment. No one is under oath.

Perhaps you should understand the context of spurious claims you make.

Let's see what happens in court, eh?

LOL

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

It's a public hearing. Anyone can comment. No one is under oath.

Perhaps you should understand the context of spurious claims you make.

Let's see what happens in court, eh?

LOL

So the video is a deep fake? Or....?
“Spurious”.... as in the actions and motive of what I’m watching in the video? Or a different meaning?
Concerning, dubious, doubtful, shady, unorthodox...etc

a reply to: Gryphon66

It's a public hearing showing video of the election.
Don't play word games with me bud.
I'm not a child.

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

It's a public hearing. Anyone can comment. No one is under oath.

Perhaps you should understand the context of spurious claims you make.

Let's see what happens in court, eh?

LOL

So the video is a deep fake? Or....?
“Spurious”.... as in the actions and motive of what I’m watching in the video? Or a different meaning?
Concerning, dubious, doubtful, shady, unorthodox...etc

Do you think the video is a deep fake?

As to the rest, good on you for looking the word up.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

It's a public hearing. Anyone can comment. No one is under oath.

Perhaps you should understand the context of spurious claims you make.

Let's see what happens in court, eh?

LOL

So the video is a deep fake? Or....?
“Spurious”.... as in the actions and motive of what I’m watching in the video? Or a different meaning?
Concerning, dubious, doubtful, shady, unorthodox...etc

Do you think the video is a deep fake?

As to the rest, good on you for looking the word up.

Pffft. Hell no. That right there is election fraud

What did you watch?


Edit: actually I drink and know things. Didn’t have to look up wordz

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's a public hearing showing video of the election.
Don't play word games with me bud.
I'm not a child.

LOL ...

Ah, progress.

It's a public hearing indeed. Anyone can get up and say anything.

No vetting, no oath, no evidence, nothing.

Trump, et. al. have failed at every turn in actual courts, so now they're on this tour of the legislatures.

Relax, kiddo ... according to another poster, they're filing cases in the morning.

The video will get it's day in court if that's true. I will go out on a limb and guess that it's not.

These folks are not about facts, the rule of law, or the Constitution ... they're about disrupting the country.

And they're succeeding.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Mandroid7

Except that the video is not verified, no one today was under oath, etc. etc.

Let's see it taken to court.

Now, I wasn't addresssing you, and have nothing more to say to you.

You are as bad as my dad who with a straight face told me the CCP offers more religious freedom than the US. Some people will be dishonest with themselves at any cost.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: HalWesten

The right questions are why were ballots in a case under a table,

IF you watch the video, storing boxes of ballots under the table is done regularly.

why did the workers tell the rest to leave before counting them,

You yourself linked a tweet saying that observers were being called back, because some ballots had to be rescanned.

why were ballots being transferred between locations unsecured in some cases and without a chain of custody?

I saw no such thing in the video.

It takes time to identify the people necessary,

But not to expose them in a viral video.

You got that all mixed up

No it’s not normal to store boxes under a covered table
She stated where they are normally stored. And found the time stamp of the lady in yellow setting up the table in the am... so that assessment of yours is wrong

The next is the observers being told to leave by said lady in yellow shirt, saying they were done. The watchers did not find out until much later from a news crew that votes were still being counted and went back to see what was up.

As for the chain of custody part, multiple sworn affidavits on how screwed up that was. Sounds like you need to go back and watch the whole thing or get a new set of debunking notes.

a reply to: Halfswede

Again, I'm not the topic.

Thanks for sharing though.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Haha, your type always try to demean people when cornered.
It's like your signature gurgling death throws.
Any means necessary, even risking prison time.

I'd pull the ejection seat lever before this bird hits the ground.
We will accept your apologies now and chalk it up to media brainwashing.
Whichever path you choose, don't forget the internet posts are permanent and everyone will have record of your stance here. For-ev-er

For-ev-er

a reply to: WhereAreTheGoodguys

Multiple sworn affidavits that were part of Wood v. Raffenspurger, which was dismissed on 11/20/20.

/shrug

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: Gryphon66

Haha, your type always try to demean people when cornered.
It's like your signature gurgling death throws.
Any means necessary, even risking prison time.

I'd pull the ejection seat lever before this bird hits the ground.
We will accept your apologies now and chalk it up to media brainwashing.
Whichever path you choose, don't forget the internet posts are permanent and everyone will have record of your stance here. For-ev-er

For-ev-er

Have you been demeaned? Really?

Your arguments are quite limited. You talk about your opinion of the other poster, you make silly claims about the media, yet you have NOTHING to back up your claims.

41 of 42 cases have been lost. Trump's attorney's have admitted they have no evidnece of voter fraud over and over and over.

You're a believer. Have faith.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's a public hearing showing video of the election.
Don't play word games with me bud.
I'm not a child.

LOL ...

Ah, progress.

It's a public hearing indeed. Anyone can get up and say anything.

No vetting, no oath, no evidence, nothing.

Trump, et. al. have failed at every turn in actual courts, so now they're on this tour of the legislatures.

Relax, kiddo ... according to another poster, they're filing cases in the morning.

The video will get it's day in court if that's true. I will go out on a limb and guess that it's not.

These folks are not about facts, the rule of law, or the Constitution ... they're about disrupting the country.

And they're succeeding.

you’re right. I can’t wait for this to go court so I can watch so many other videos of this type of behavior and protocol in so many other Presidential elections. Happens all the time I’m sure. The kicking people out and grabbing suitcases of ballots after officially closing....

Completely proving this is all above board......

It’ll be fun to hear the defense explain what is ACTUALLY happening to us mouth-breathers about what is exactly goin on here. Like a couple of you are doing atm.