It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: vonclod
Yes, I do understand! and I understand the need to control whats happening at the border. Just pointing out that difference, not cool what was done. Not that any of it is cool, but "some" of it was/is necessary.
Kids in cages were kind of necessary... There is a level of safety there as in we didn't know even if the grown ups were their real parents or just people using kids to get in.
I find it funny that these kids would be dragged across 1000s of miles out in the open, no shelter, hardly any food, sick, cold and hungry for months on end and finally ending up in a secured shelter with food, warmth, security, medical, care etc would see that as a bad thing... "kids in cages" was a liberal narrative against OMB that was OK under Obama.
originally posted by: vonclod
I disagree it was really necessary to separate though. It's ok, we can agree to disagree on that point.
originally posted by: Murgatroid
a reply to: Never Despise
Neither A OR B... This IS going to the the Supreme Court where it will likely be sent to the House. THAT is Trump's endgame. Only other option is the SC invalidates the election. Either one keeps the crazies out of the WH which is what the SC are going to do...
The SCOTUS does not decide facts, they answer constitutional arguments. “Most” cases must go to trial and work there way up to the SCOTUS. BUT!!!!! There are a couple of cases, like Brown v. Board of Edu, where statistical data proved beyond a shadow of doubt that citizens rights were constitutionally violated.
There is more than enough statistical data to prove that Trump voters had their constitutional rights violated under the 14th Amendment. Chief Justus Roberts has argued this point in the past. This would cause the SCOTUS to throw out the election and then Congress would choose the Pres and VP.
www.deepcapture.com...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
a reply to: johnnylaw16
There is a first time for everything... I am real curious though, WHAT will you do when Trump proves you wrong? I only ask because I know Trump will not lose. He CANNOT lose in fact... I thought this was pretty interesting BTW...
The SCOTUS does not decide facts, they answer constitutional arguments. “Most” cases must go to trial and work there way up to the SCOTUS. BUT!!!!! There are a couple of cases, like Brown v. Board of Edu, where statistical data proved beyond a shadow of doubt that citizens rights were constitutionally violated.
There is more than enough statistical data to prove that Trump voters had their constitutional rights violated under the 14th Amendment. Chief Justus Roberts has argued this point in the past. This would cause the SCOTUS to throw out the election and then Congress would choose the Pres and VP.
www.deepcapture.com...
< br />
originally posted by: carewemust
Here is the very latest electoral map update.
www.thegatewaypundit.com...