It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Klassified
For the first time in this whole tragic story of the 2020 presidential election, a state court has granted Republicans in Nevada and the Trump campaign the ability to present their case of widespread illegal balloting and to depose up to 15 people who know what went down in Clark County, in the state of Nevada...
This is an interesting development. A state court is actually going to hear the case and allow a presentation of all the evidence. Mark Meadows believes Nevada's results will be over-turned if they get a fair hearing.
...we have thousands and thousands of examples of real people and real-life instances of voter illegality, and I just think it’s a great step that we’re gonna have a chance to present it in court.
Here's the Trump teams chance to show what they've got, and convince the judge to see it their way. It will be interesting to see the results. This could set precedent that could be used in other cases. We shall see.
Link
Twitter account
For those who are not video challenged...
Source: tennesseestar.com...
"We are going to provide evidence of real voter fraud—thousands and thousands of instances of voter fraud in Nevada alone—by 5 o'clock today that will be submitted to the court," Trump lawyer Jesse Binnall told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo on Mornings With Maria on Thursday morning.
Binnall reported that Team Trump has found 40,000-plus individuals who have voted twice in the election.
"That's real voter fraud. We have data showing that people who were on the record as having voted by mail didn't even receive ballots and say that they didn't vote," Binnall stated.
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
I may be missing something here but if 1.75 went out and 2.5 came back then what other evidence is needed to toss this whole thing?
What could possibly be the defense to that?
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
I may be missing something here but if 1.75 went out and 2.5 came back then what other evidence is needed to toss this whole thing?
What could possibly be the defense to that?
originally posted by: nataylor
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
I may be missing something here but if 1.75 went out and 2.5 came back then what other evidence is needed to toss this whole thing?
What could possibly be the defense to that?
The defense is that that obviously didn't happen.
There are a total of 1,407,754 ballots cast in Nevada. Of those, 671,899 were returned absentee ballots.
silverstateelection.nv.gov...
originally posted by: Klassified
This is an interesting development. A state court is actually going to hear the case and allow a presentation of all the evidence. Mark Meadows believes Nevada's results will be over-turned if they get a fair hearing.
originally posted by: BigfootNZ
originally posted by: Klassified
This is an interesting development. A state court is actually going to hear the case and allow a presentation of all the evidence. Mark Meadows believes Nevada's results will be over-turned if they get a fair hearing.
Not exactly pertinent to the thread, but this paragraph of the OP grated on me, I know its the words of the OP, and not Trumps lot specifically but its still a prime example of the mentality of Trump, his lawyers and his supporters...
ie, if we dont get the outcome we want, its all corrupt! We didnt get the results we wanted therefore the hearing must have been biased and unfair!
its just maddening intellectual dishonesty, really pisses me off.
originally posted by: carewemust
Wow.. 8000 pages of evidence of election law violations, were given to the Nevada Court today!
mobile.twitter.com...