Raid On Election Servers In Germany

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: FlyinHeadlock

Stop peddling lies!

Dominion, Scytl and SmartMatic all released statements.

None of their offices have been raided. There are facts on all 3 links. Go read them and educate yourself.

They would still claim that servers were tampered with even if you provided logs showing otherwise.

I mean if some lame ass anonymous site called distrbutednews. Com says so than it must be true.

Because everyone knows that people who might hold this kind of info would break their story to a bull# blog lookalike 5 dollar yearly budget WordPress html site.

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: FlyinHeadlock

End of the day mail in ballots trashed the whole system.

This is only an issue because Trump said it was, he knew fine what he was doing when he said that.

Nah, anything says that you perceive to have a negative impact on society, is a reflection of the people and how fragile their minds are. This fragility is far more impactful than who is President.

Since Scytl was sold to Paragon we might be looking at a different story here. Paragon Data GmbH is located at Friedrichsdorf next to Frankfurt.

Creditors give the green light to the sale of Scytl to the Irish Paragon

originally posted by: FlyinHeadlock
Long article. The author makes the claim that the servers raided were not of a company but were CIA owned. The US could not go into another country with the military and raid a private company legally. Hard to find info about the supposed raid but if there was one this would make sense. It would have to be our own stuff we raided.

People have watched too many films and are living in la la land if they think the US military can operate in a sovereign foreign country. Even if it relates to US equipment.

It does not happen. Ever. The US has no jurisdiction in German law.

This is a fantasy story. A hoax. It belongs in the hoax bin.

a reply to: neformore

Welcome to la la land!

Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty regarding the Status of their Forces

The parties to the North Atlantic Treaty signed in Washington on 4 April, 1949,
Considering that the forces of one Party may be sent, by arrangement, to serve in the territory of another Party;
Bearing in mind that the decision to send them and the conditions under which they will be sent, in so far as such conditions are not laid down by the present Agreement, will continue to be the subject of separate arrangements between the Parties concerned;
Desiring, however, to define the status of such forces while in the territory of another Party;

The authorities of the receiving and sending States shall assist each other in the carrying out of all necessary investigations into offences, and in the collection and production of evidence, including the seizure and, in proper cases, the handing over of objects connected with an offence. The handing over of such objects may, however, be made subject to their return within the time specified by the authority delivering them.

a reply to: XCrycek

I think it would go a long way to satisfying those claims if they did open up the log books...why is it they haven't again?!?!

originally posted by: neformore

originally posted by: FlyinHeadlock
Long article. The author makes the claim that the servers raided were not of a company but were CIA owned. The US could not go into another country with the military and raid a private company legally. Hard to find info about the supposed raid but if there was one this would make sense. It would have to be our own stuff we raided.

People have watched too many films and are living in la la land if they think the US military can operate in a sovereign foreign country. Even if it relates to US equipment.

It does not happen. Ever. The US has no jurisdiction in German law.

This is a fantasy story. A hoax. It belongs in the hoax bin.

Well, go ahead and put it there......oh...wait!

a reply to: neformore

The story I heard made very clear that Germany was asked and proper paperwork was signed off on, and that Germans took the lead with US military assets in support...nothing specific. That is exactly how I would expect something so sensitive to be handled by what is supposed to be an allied country.

I contend it is you living in la la land buddy...

When asked by The Associated Press if the Army had engaged in an operation to recover servers in Germany, an Army spokesperson responded Saturday, “Those allegations are false.”

apnews.com...

Following several erroneous statements that have been published in digital and social media, Scytl would like to clarify the following:

The technologies implemented by Scytl in the US are both hosted and managed within the US, by a local subsidiary, SOE Software, based in Tampa, Florida.
- We do not tabulate, tally or count votes in the US
- We do not provide voting machines in the US
- We did not provide online voting to US jurisdictions for the US elections.
- We do not have servers or offices in Frankfurt
- The US army has not seized anything from Scytl in Barcelona, Frankfurt or anywhere else
- We are not owned by George Soros and have never been connected to him
- We are not tied to Smartmatic, SGO, Dominion or Indra
- We have no ties with Russia either

www.scytl.com...

a reply to: neformore

So after reading the AP article they seem to have no issue naming and citing exactly who is refuting the claim, however when it comes to citing the army source its just "spokesperson for the Army". Little odd as I would assume that person has a name just like all the other cited sources reported on. As far as the companies denial...have we not seen enough instances of companies lying to cover their asses to know not to just trust what they're saying...especially in cases where the counter argument they are refuting is damaging to them?

originally posted by: RickyD
Little odd as I would assume that person has a name just like all the other cited sources reported on.

And yet you're happy to accept the original claim from a 'source'.

Confirmed by attorney sydney Powell this afternoon at the Trump legal team press briefing, that the raid actually happened.

a reply to: carewemust

Not confirmed. Claimed.

Falsely I might add.

No raid took place.