Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!

a reply to: turbonium1

You

The Sun itself slowly goes out of sight past the perfectly flat, straight horizon,

Nope. It’s physically blocked from view.




Post a screen shoot of this photo “zoomed” to show its not physically blocked by the earths curvature.

You

But the LIGHT from the Sun still hits Earth, and the sky above you, even when it cannot be seen anymore.

We know that is a blatant falsehood because the clouds are not illuminated in the total darkness of night.

Again. Two experiments that remove “prospective” that show your full of crap.

The Rainy Lake Experiment
Saturday, July 20, 2019 - 00:50 | Author: wabis | Topics: FlatEarth, Knowlegde, Science, Experiment

walter.bislins.ch...

Backs the flat earth experiment on

Behind the Curve' Ending: Flat Earthers Disprove Themselves With Own Experiments in Netflix Documentary

BY ANDREW WHALEN ON 2/25/19 AT 5:04 PM EST



www.newsweek.com...

Campanella devises an experiment involving three posts of the same height and a high-powered laser. The idea is to set up three measuring posts over a nearly 4 mile length of equal elevation. Once the laser is activated at the first post, its height can be measured at the other two. If the laser is at eight feet on the first post, then five feet at the second, then it indicates the measuring posts are set upon the Earth's curvature.

In his first attempt, Campanella's laser light spread out too much over the distance, making an accurate measurement impossible. But at the very end of Behind the Curve, Campanella comes up with a similar experiment, this time involving a light instead of a laser. With two holes cut into styrofoam sheets at the same height, Campanella hopes to demonstrate that a light shone through the first hole will appear on a camera behind the second hole, indicating that a light, set at the same height as the holes, travelled straight across the surface of the Flat Earth. But if the light needs to be raised to a different height than the holes, it would indicate a curvature, invalidating the Flat Earth.

Campanella watches when the light is activated at the same height as the holes, but the light can't be seen on the camera screen. "Lift up your light, way above your head," Campanella says. With the compensation made for the curvature of the Earth, the light immediately appears on the camera. "Interesting," Campanella says. "That's interesting." The documentary ends.

With demonstrable proof the earth is spherical

quote]

TONGA VOLCANO ERUPTION SHOCK WAVES DETECTED IN CHICAGO

abc7chicago.com...

"The eruption was so powerful that the waves actually propagated all the way around the globe and then back again," meteorologist Gino Izzi said.

originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People

originally posted by: AncientHeru
a reply to: Phage

I want to see a live film of the entire planet from space.

And no, i don't have billions of dollars of technology at my disposal.

Adding to neutronflux's practical evidence (i.e., no need to see it from space), here is another example:

If the Earth were flat, then how do people in Perth, Australia see the same stars when they look directly south (such as the constellation Southern Cross, AKA Crux) at the same time as the people in Johannesburg, South Africa do when they look directly south.

According to the prevailing flat earth map, this would be impossible; "due south" for Perth is in a very different direction as "due south" for Johannesburg, as in the illustration below:

(By the way, this problem would be just as true if the stars weren't really many lightyears away, but rather on a dome, or the firmament, close to Earth as some flat Earth models say)

a reply to: turbonium1

So it’s not lost and ignored

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

You

On your 'guitar surface' it IS curved, shown by a perpendicular view of it,

Yuu have to be the most dishonest poster, and you entirely rely on dishonest arguments.

What your doing is relying, and purposely ignoring a photograph is 2D, and has no sense of depth.

Start with this example.

Which pencil is the shortest, should it be seen in the perpendicular view?


No. The is no sense of depth. The needed information is hidden. Your purposefully cherry picking an angle that hides the visual clues and needed dimension of depth to hide what is really going on.

Here’s another view. Which pencil is the shortest?


But, now look below. A photo that does show which pencil Is the shortest. Because it has the proper angle to show the needed information.


Now. The view your saying shows there is no “curvature” of this piece of cardboard as an example.


Because the photo removed the dimension of depth, the view you want to use purposefully hides the curvature that is there all among.



If you think there is no curvature to this box top, I have a video of a pencil rolls down the curved piece of cardboard.

You

it requires a PANORAMA,

Why. When this picture gives clues and reference to make up for a photo having no dimension of depths.

url=https://imgur.com/PjjXxlp][/url]

a reply to: turbonium1

This never works. But I’ll try….

Now turbo. Let’s take a deep breath, and start small.

Let’s take three cases of the night sky being changed.

Witnesses arrest to, and it’s documented Sputnik, the international space station, and the star link satellites have changed the night sky. Placing man made objects visibly In space. And actively broadcast, or had broadcast from orbit. Is this a false statement.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

Just keep claiming that man isn’t placing objects in orbit around the earth. And creating documented changes. Just highlights the flat earth lies. Just kills your credibility, and makes you look ridiculous.

A United Nations committee will discuss whether pristine night sky should be protected against Starlink trains.

www.space.com...

More from this very website, ATS. Like to see you try to crash the thread, and prove the personal experiences of those posting there are false.

Geomagnetic storm sends 40 Starlink satellites plummeting to Earth

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: turbonium1

And you still have no explanation for tides, why oceans “seek” high tides, and tidal bores.

Turbo, you make flat earth look stupid and blatantly false. Flat earth, the play ground for those that are trolls and post blatant falsehoods…

An example or two..



Ok? Not sure how true. Looks to be a load of crap.
Not sure what it has to with the earth being spherical.



wp.wwu.edu...

Other example





Funny, the boat I was on had no trouble with satellite communication In the pacific.

Communication Underway: Everything to Know About Emails

thesubmergedlife.com...

Parents and significant others of a submariner learn to embrace email as their lifeline of communication while their sailor is underway. Unlike other Navy communities, submariners do not have the ability to casually communicate with their families via phone or video chat while they are out to sea. Forget about direct messaging platforms…in the submarine community, we learn to make email our jam…because it’s all we have! Don’t get me wrong, communicating solely through email can be tough!

Navigation

science.howstuffworks.com...

The inertial guidance systems are accurate to 150 hours of operation and must be realigned by other surface-dependent navigational systems (GPS, radio, radar, satellite). With these systems onboard, a submarine can be accurately navigated and be within a hundred feet of its intended course.

Anyway…

How amateur satellite trackers are keeping an 'eye' on objects around the Earth
By Leonard David published May 03, 2020

www.space.com...

In 2006, amateurs began to track satellites in secret orbits by measuring and analyzing the Doppler shift of their radio signals, or changes in the frequencies of the radio waves caused by the relative motion of the observer and the satellite.

Keep up with the flat earth lies so we can see the movement for what it is.




WHY DO FLAT EARTHERS CAUGHT IN POSTING BLATANT LIES ACT LIKE THEY HAVE A SHRED OF CREDIBILITY!!!!

Because they are trolls.

a reply to: turbonium1

You

But the LIGHT from the Sun still hits Earth, and the sky above you, even when it cannot be seen anymore.

Addressed in the opening post of this thread.

originally posted by: muzzleflash
So I walk about 10 miles a day and really enjoy the sunrises and sunsets on the mountains, anyways as I walk along I see this:

Pics from 3 days over the last few months at sunrise.
Only edit was to compress to fit on ATS.

THE ONLY WAY THE SUN CAN SHINE ON THE BOTTOM OF CLOUDS IS IF ITS BELOW THEM!
THE ONLY WAY IT CAN BE BELOW THEM IS IF THE EARTH IS ROUND!!

It does not reflect off the ground like this or the clouds would be lit up all day long!!!

Here is a diagram:
(Change "Aerosol layer" with "Cloud layer" to apply to this exhibit)

I've listened to dozens of videos on Youtube over the years "top 100 reasons Earth is FLAT" and I admit this subject had me totally stumped for years and I just couldn't figure out if it was flat or round.

Well, as I walked along that fateful morning a few months ago - It Dawned on me.
Literally!!!

The only way these photographs are physically possible is if the sun was actually below the horizon shining upwards on the bottom of my nearby clouds.

Flat Earth DEBUNKED!

How come I NEVER heard anyone argue this in the last 10 years of debates????
Not only am I dumb for never noticing this but it shows just how inept literally everyone is at physics including the shills from NASA (Never A Straight Answer).

I swear this has got to be a huge conspiracy to purposely dumb down everyone and strip away all mathematical thinking and logic from the masses.


Oh, and I got a cool bonus photo from yesterday afternoon -

I just screwed your mind with a cloud.

Supporting pics.

a reply to: turbonium1

You seem to have forgotten to answer my questions.

Try again.

The guitar surface is curved. The curve appears flat when viewed at 'ground level'. Objects appear and disappear over that curve in the same way ships do.

Provide me with a flat Earth example showing your version of events is true.

Let's stick with simple analogies shall we.

The back of the guitar is very slightly curved.

Can you tell?

No?

How about now?

Turbo only wants to allow the first two photos to be permitted. If that was the case, you'd come away with a false impression of reality. The true picture doesn't appear until you've looked at all angles.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Turbo = “ false impression of reality”…

the rooster
a reply to: caterpillage

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo




How about you show one from NASA or SPUTNIK that was not computer generated
CGI oops just killed any credibility Not A Space Agency pretended to have.
Keep believing your paper theories are predesigned to prove a narrative.
Does not mean they are credible or worth mentioning but since the issue was forced Statistics say what you want them to physics ignores scalar equations etc and etc its easy to repeat something as fact it is a lot harder to question what is regarded as "fact"
I showed the height needed to accurately encompass the entirety of earth and no current man made object has reached it manned. Even Jeff's rocket did not reach space (proven on thread by me long ago)
So either fly to actual space and take a picture of the entirety of the earth without using computer enhancements of admit this thread premise does not prove anything than an overactive ego and feeling of self worth
INFINITE PLANE THEORY
How does it prove that wrong oops it doesn't because it is a weak argument to begin with get over it
there is no absolute proof of anything and to claim otherwise is reminiscent of charlatans and frauds.

a reply to: CrazyFox

What. Your just posting propaganda and lies. And you have no credibility to answer to your lies.

You should start by apologizing for posting this blatant lie.




Funny, the boat I was on had no trouble with satellite communication In the pacific.

Communication Underway: Everything to Know About Emails

thesubmergedlife.com...

Parents and significant others of a submariner learn to embrace email as their lifeline of communication while their sailor is underway. Unlike other Navy communities, submariners do not have the ability to casually communicate with their families via phone or video chat while they are out to sea. Forget about direct messaging platforms…in the submarine community, we learn to make email our jam…because it’s all we have! Don’t get me wrong, communicating solely through email can be tough!

Navigation

science.howstuffworks.com...

The inertial guidance systems are accurate to 150 hours of operation and must be realigned by other surface-dependent navigational systems (GPS, radio, radar, satellite). With these systems onboard, a submarine can be accurately navigated and be within a hundred feet of its intended course.

Anyway…

How amateur satellite trackers are keeping an 'eye' on objects around the Earth
By Leonard David published May 03, 2020

www.space.com...

In 2006, amateurs began to track satellites in secret orbits by measuring and analyzing the Doppler shift of their radio signals, or changes in the frequencies of the radio waves caused by the relative motion of the observer and the satellite.

Keep up with the flat earth lies so we can see the movement for what it is.




Witnesses arrest to, and it’s documented Sputnik, the international space station, and the star link satellites have changed the night sky. Placing man made objects visibly In space. And actively broadcast, or had broadcast from orbit. Is this a false statement.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

Just keep claiming that man isn’t placing objects in orbit around the earth. And creating documented changes. Just highlights the flat earth lies. Just kills your credibility, and makes you look ridiculous.

A United Nations committee will discuss whether pristine night sky should be protected against Starlink trains.

www.space.com...

More from this very website, ATS. Like to see you try to crash the thread, and prove the personal experiences of those posting there are false.

Geomagnetic storm sends 40 Starlink satellites plummeting to Earth

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: CrazyFox

You


Reality…

On Earth, most helicopters and drones have rotors that spin at about 400-500 revolutions per minute. The Ingenuity’s rotor spun at about 2,400 revolutions per minute.

It also has a distinct aircraft-to-wingspan ratio. While Ingenuity’s body is about the size of a tissue box, its blades are 1.2m from tip to tip.


theconversation.com...

Evidently there is enough wind to generate dust storms

www.esa.int/About_Us/ESAC/Mars_dust_storm

www.esa.int...

It was one of several local small-scale dust storms that have been observed in recent months at the Red Planet, which is currently enduring a particularly intense dust storm season. A much larger storm emerged further southwest at the end of May and developed into a global, planet-encircling dust storm within several weeks.

a reply to: CrazyFox

Comets change the night sky, travel around the solar system, pivot about the sun, comets crash into planets, or are destroyed by the sun.

Why can’t people send space probes where comets go?


Flat earth is observably ridiculous.

originally posted by: CrazyFox
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo
How about you show one from NASA or SPUTNIK that was not computer generated
CGI oops just killed any credibility Not A Space Agency pretended to have.

Already did that, do keep up:

Keep believing your paper theories are predesigned to prove a narrative.
Does not mean they are credible or worth mentioning but since the issue was forced Statistics say what you want them to physics ignores scalar equations etc and etc its easy to repeat something as fact it is a lot harder to question what is regarded as "fact"

Show me a fact. Show me you understand any of the BS you're parroting.

I showed the height needed to accurately encompass the entirety of earth and no current man made object has reached it manned.

Yeah they have though, see the photo above.

Even Jeff's rocket did not reach space (proven on thread by me long ago)

All depends on your definition of space. I could care less what he spends his money on.

So either fly to actual space and take a picture of the entirety of the earth without using computer enhancements of admit this thread premise does not prove anything than an overactive ego and feeling of self worth

Already posted it. You need more?

INFINITE PLANE THEORY
How does it prove that wrong oops it doesn't because it is a weak argument to begin with get over it
there is no absolute proof of anything and to claim otherwise is reminiscent of charlatans and frauds.

Maybe have a buddy system so you don't drunk post next time.

I see that Turbo has a friend who lies just as much as he does. Bless, how cute. I also see that they are just as behind the curve (no pun intended) when it comes to basic physics and, indeed, reality.

Oh and if there was no such thing as GPS or satellites at sea, then I guess that the people at Lloyd's List, with their global ship positioning software and website are wasting their time are they? They plot cargo vessels all over the globe. Marine insurers are quite interested in such things you see.
Unless - gasp! - marine insurers are a part of the globalist conspiracy!!!
(Fun fact: they're not)

CGI doesn't count that is a worse pic than the ops try again.
Oh so that Sputnik photo came from the prior mentioned height to actually be able to see the entirety of the world nope sorry but it is low atmospheric orbit.
Post soemthing that is not cgi or you prove nothing again just like all the pages of propaganda you constantly post but never ever ever address infinite plane theory once nothing you post disproves it. Keep telling yourself it is a ball all you want but when a story has to change to fit new data it means it's likely a falsehood.
IE When you tell one lie you keep repeating it and telling more and more lies getting more unbelievable yet somehow still clung to even when the entire premise of this thread has been that altered/compressed photos are absolute proof. Then you talk about a disc which is not what I brought to the table when I first killed this thread so long ago. Trying to keep an argument within only the data you want to control and regurgitate is not a way to have a discussion.
When the pictures were altered compressed they became cgi period and are not absolute proof of anything other than an enormous ego that is lacking any substance since the entire thread is based on cgi or fakery IE
THE PREMISE OF THIS THREAD IS BASED ON TRICKERY
the fact that you add all this other data to try to prove the is round actually disproves it as absolute proof since the pictures were absolute proof (altered an thus fake) why the need to post anything other than pictures that lack proper light balance and personally would be embarrassed to post like that publicly let alone try to declare it as absolute proof that even a digital camera can take bad pictures.






a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Lies this thread is based of off of cgi
what more would you expect with a thread that starts off here is some absolute proof that's been digitally altered
Good grief
This thread is based on deception from the start (which I pointed out long ago but here I am weekly having to come in and remind everyone reading of that fact that was pointed out over a hundred pages ago
no memes tonight as it's a work night and but I am sure that someone will repost more garbage theories pictures of a ship etc some lines etc blah blah blah
Repeating a lie does not make it true
Just like this thread even if the world is round the pictures posted did not prove it nor could they since they were admittedly altered
I could take a picture of dropping the kids off at the pool and explain how they do not stink because they are in water and it would have more credibility than the premise of this thread.
Realize that any proof you post showing the earth is round does exactly the same thing because absolute needs no support which the cgi/photos in the op were allegedly.
So anything posted to support the roundness of the earth debunks the thread just as much as my free thinking does
Wonder if it can be moved to the hoax bin since its been nothing but debunked for hundreds of pages.

The kids smell will go away once you pull the lever hopefully it will take this thread with it (things that stink flock together just saying)

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: CrazyFox
CGI doesn't count that is a worse pic than the ops try again.

That photo is 53 years old and the details in it are verifiable. Try again.

Oh so that Sputnik photo came from the prior mentioned height to actually be able to see the entirety of the world nope sorry but it is low atmospheric orbit.

1. You don't get to dictate which evidence is permitted.
2. No-one claimed it wasn't in LEO.
3. You do know what an orbit is, right? Do tell the class how they work on an 'infinite plane'.

Post soemthing that is not cgi

Done many times. You don't seem to understand what CGI is.

or you prove nothing again just like all the pages of propaganda you constantly post but never ever ever address infinite plane theory once nothing you post disproves it.

Everything I post disproves it. Prove otherwise. Lazy copying and pasting untrue memes is not proof.

Keep telling yourself it is a ball all you want but when a story has to change to fit new data it means it's likely a falsehood.

The story hasn't changed. The Earth is not flat.

IE When you tell one lie

Prove anyone lied.

you keep repeating it and telling more and more lies getting more unbelievable yet somehow still clung to even when the entire premise of this thread has been that altered/compressed photos are absolute proof.

That is not the premise of the thread.

Then you talk about a disc which is not what I brought to the table when I first killed this thread so long ago. Trying to keep an argument within only the data you want to control and regurgitate is not a way to have a discussion.

Killed the thread. Pmsl. Prove any photo has been altered. You bitching about controlling a thread is hypocrisy. Regurgitating lying and incorrect memes is not a discussion. You are not debating anything here.

When the pictures were altered compressed they became cgi

And the pictures that aren't compressed? That aren't digital?

period and are not absolute proof of anything other than an enormous ego that is lacking any substance since the entire thread is based on cgi or fakery IE
THE PREMISE OF THIS THREAD IS BASED ON TRICKERY

Where do digitally constructed factually false memes fit in here, do you think?

the fact that you add all this other data to try to prove the is round actually disproves it as absolute proof since the pictures were absolute proof (altered an thus fake) why the need to post anything other than pictures that lack proper light balance and personally would be embarrassed to post like that publicly let alone try to declare it as absolute proof that even a digital camera can take bad pictures.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

You definitely don't understand CGI. I'll post whatever I see fit to make a point, what was that about controlling the debate again. Prove them wrong. Prove the photo I posted isn't genuine.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I love how they pat themselves on the back and claim victory with nothing proven, no evidence... just lies

its across the board too, every flat earther has the same tactics

Im sure their god would be proud