-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- - §29§ -

a reply to: steaming

steaming, I was watching the BBC headlines around midday today and they showed the death statistics in UK as averaging 11 per day but... the small print identified the count as "ANY death within 28 days of a positive test".


I was going to post earlier on it but ran out of time.

So the 11 deaths per day, in the whole of the UK, included people who died in car accidents, of old age, of 2/3 other health issues, domestic violence, etc.

This implies to me that they are finding between ZERO and 3 deaths a day that were actually prime cause of Covid19!

In turn this implies that the rona is no longer actually an issue in the UK.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Status of COVID-19

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.

No longer a threat to public health. Apparently the media never got the memo.🤔

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
EYES (EARS) ON - Please cross-check this for me...

In this POTUS' video tweet at 10:47:02

t.co...

At the 0:26 mark, POTUS says:

We're on track to have the best year we've every had NEXT WEEK

P.s. Always worth a full listen to any videos POTUS TWEETS directly, rather than RETWEETing videos by others!

Hey Rel, I didn’t hear ‘week ’ it sounded more like “.. best year next year”, to me at least- that part did strike me as odd though- not sure why they wouldn’t edit that out since it seems to trail off there, but sheesh what do I know?
And I second carewemust’s sentiments- thank you for all your hard work and patience explaining Q decodes to newbies rookies like myself. It’s like learning a new ancient language grateful we have you! 🙏

a reply to: CoramDeo

I can report that everything in PA is now under control.

Is it ok to aggregate Q newz stories w/o comment, since everything already has been said, also it speaks for itself...

thehill.com/policy/technology/516102-qanon-spreads-across-globe-shadowing-covid-19
thehill.com...

“Pandemics fuel a lot of questions and make people very skeptical, especially in cases when what we would consider to be credible and trustworthy institutions all of a sudden themselves don't seem to have the right answers or are not aligned on how to manage the situation,” Anna-Sophie Harling, head of media evaluation startup NewsGuard’s Europe team, said in an interview.

“Conspiracies are rooted in the idea that we're all being lied to by some greater authority or voice and QAnon perfectly ties into that.”

The Wolves Within

An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life:

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Is Belarus formerly East Prussia?

Sorta. They have an extremely long ancient history. In 1795, Belarus was divided between Russia, Austria and Prussia.
www.belarus.by...

I wouldn't trust that source to be unbiased.

That part of Europe was then part of what was called the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. "Belarus" as a state wasn't a thing back then. The 1795 Partition was not of "Belarus", but rather of the Kingdom of Poland, which included the Commonwealth.

(Ever wonder why the World War II treaty town is referred to as "Brest-Litovsk"? That literally means "Lithuanian Brest".)

Yeah, Prussia, Russia, and Austria carved it all up, bringing about a common border between the Prussians and Russia, two peoples who have always had an uncommon fascination with each other.

Anyway, to the original question, is Belarus former East Prussia ? The answer is no, based on the 1945 frontiers of East Prussia. The territory that was East Prussia in 1945 is now more or less evenly split between NW Poland and the Kaliningrad Exclave of Russia. Belarus is part of the lands that were in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, or, more generally, a geographical region referred to as Ruthenia.

Cheers

I don't think most people realize that a knife penetrates body armour.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Thanks for the short history lesson, professor.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I heard Year also. I think it was just the clip mix of the video that gave it the week sound, but it mixed over year if that makes sense.

ETA: Maybe Splice would be a better word! Where the two pieces of footage were spliced together

a reply to: FlyingFox

Watching the clip it looked like his left hand was in his pocket. Then where they show the still there is another item on the ground to the left in front of him, but it isnt circled like the knife was. I wonder if it came out of his pocket? Cell phone maybe?

Tonight's SPREADSHEET UPDATE will contain some NEW FUNCTIONALITY.

I'm detailing it now or the update will be a long post:

1) I have updated the MACRO ONLY file to create secondary versions of any Q post with [brackets]:
a) These show those posts with the brackets REMOVED,
b) The secondary version is therefore easier to read and see the change in sense,
c) It was not that easy to do because there are often brackets within brackets, and it needs to decide whether to remove a space before or after the brackets to avoid double spaces.
d) The "Bracketless Post" can be read at column BT of the "Main DECODE RESULTS" tab.


2) Since the length of a post points us to a linked post, logically the length of the post without the brackets also points us to a linked post, as does the difference between the original length and the shortened length!
a) The shortened length and the difference in length are held in column BU of the "Main DECODE RESULTS tab.

3) The "Linked posts", held in column F of the "Main DECODE RESULTS tab, have been updated to include those generated by point 2(a) above.

4) When I get time I'll update the other DECODE tabs so that you can set a parameter to view the post With/Without brackets!

Ballots?
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

3x POTUS self-retweets, within the 27 tweets already after midnight:

#1, at 00:38:53,
DELTA = 00 06:08:42
USUAL DECODES point to:
Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q23, Q38, Q42, Q46, Q47, Q53, Q54, Q75, Q78, Q94, Q108, Q138, Q146, Q538, Q608, Q842, Q1238, Q1738, Q3815, Q3853


#2, at 00:48:18,
DELTA = 10 07:30:03
USUAL DECODES point to:
Q3, Q7, Q10, Q18, Q30, Q48, Q105, Q108, Q121, Q219, Q548, Q730, Q1007, Q1248, Q1748, Q3003


#3, at 00:49:54,
DELTA = 04 16:56:12
USUAL DECODES point to:
Q4, Q5, Q12, Q16, Q32, Q49, Q54, Q56, Q97, Q142, Q191, Q416, Q549, Q1249, Q1656, Q1749

SPREADSHEET UPDATE - Sep 13th + NEW FUNCTIONALITY
13 Q posts, 31 POTUS tweets; 7 retweets, 14 video tweets
Total = 44


Q V18.93 20200913 to 4698 incl DECODE tools
QPosts Pictures v18.93 20200913 from QPost 3601 to 4698

NEW FUNCTIONALITY = Posts without brackets - see recent post.


Most linked posts in the day's decodes:
14 Q8
13
12
11 Q7, Q23
10
9 Q1, Q2
8 Q22, Q47
7 Q4, Q9, Q10
6 Q16, Q18, Q19, Q58
5 Q14, Q54
4 Q3, Q5, Q11, Q31, Q33, Q40, Q44, Q48, Q56, Q63, Q77, Q104

a reply to: nowayreally and onehuman

Cheers for the cross check both... I must be going deaf.


Off for some zeds now.

a reply to: FlyingFox

How’s that work? Maybe a flak vest...but I know the body armor I used to wear would most assuredly stop a knife. How does it stop a bullet traveling hundreds of feet per second, but not a knife? The big plates in actual body armor would stop a knife. The rest of the vest would probably not.

This is a google doc with a list of all of the Antifa bail funds by city.
There's also a list of attorneys that are willing to represent them. Keep scrolling down.
Thought I would share for one of those you never know moments where it may come in handy. May be a good dig tool for somewhere along the line.

LINK to Document with Live links inside

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: FlyingFox

How’s that work? Maybe a flak vest...but I know the body armor I used to wear would most assuredly stop a knife. How does it stop a bullet traveling hundreds of feet per second, but not a knife? The big plates in actual body armor would stop a knife. The rest of the vest would probably not.

Most civilian organisations will
not buy the knife plates for body armor they use level IIIA body armor rated up to .357 mag
i work security and this is what we are issued. my training instructor actually tested our body armor recently and it stopped the first shot of regular .40 ammo i believe it was FMJ. the second round went right through the front panel.

www.ar500armor.com...

here is a place to purchase such a thing

www.galls.com... 0e63915&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=IM-Shopping&utm_term=4577335627146620&utm_content=PLA