It just doesn't happen

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carsforkids

No.

Well then I guess you have me at a loss.

originally posted by: carsforkids

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carsforkids

No.

Well then I guess you have me at a loss.

How unusual.

a reply to: Phage

Some people think the world is flat. Now that is ridiculous.

You got me there we can agree on somethings.

How unusual.

Ya right.

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: TzarChasm

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.

What exactly did you hear? What is your definition of biological evolution ( presuming you have one)?

a reply to: Phantom423

I tend to favor notions like this.

In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.

Source

a reply to: carsforkids

Your source:

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.

a reply to: Phage

Yep I did read it Phage

As it happens, Muller and Newman are not alone in this judgment. In the last decade or so a host of scientific essays and books have questioned the efficacy of selection and mutation as a mechanism for generating morphological novelty, as even a brief literature survey will establish.

a reply to: carsforkids

So, do you agree or disagree?

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard

a reply to: Phage

Not sure really

As it happens, Muller and Newman are not alone in this judgment. In the last decade or so a host of scientific essays and books have questioned the efficacy of selection and mutation as a mechanism for generating morphological novelty, as even a brief literature survey will establish.

a reply to: carsforkids

I tend to favor notions like this.

Cognitive dissonance?

a reply to: Phage

I certainly wouldn't say that.

a reply to: carsforkids

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.

I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?

a reply to: Phage

I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?

Intelligent design is the topic don't put your confusion on me.

What forum is this?
.

a reply to: carsforkids

Your OP:

What evolution suggests would be the equivalent of throwing the
shards of a broken window in the air and getting a new window.

A source you recently used:

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.

Smells like cognitive dissonance on your part.

a reply to: Phage

I referred to evolution again what forum is this?

a reply to: carsforkids

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.

Your source (which you claim to have read);

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.

How do you reconcile these two contradictory ideas?

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Phantom423

I tend to favor notions like this.

In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.

Source

.

I think it's pretty obvious you are the only one who is so outrageously insulted.

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Phage

I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?

Intelligent design is the topic don't put your confusion on me.

What forum is this?
.

I'm pretty sure your topic is "Why aren't people more ticked off about theory of evolution, surely anyone with a brain could see it's all dumb " and you were really low key passive aggressive about it and you act like you weren't trying to attack anyone but we all know what's up.

a reply to: Phage

You're confused again I said "I tend to favor such notions" as this quote
for cry'n out loud.

In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.

I didn't quote the whole thing.

a reply to: carsforkids

So you are cherry picking.