Reality is a dance of numbers

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Ahadu

I have already proven that numbers are not something I should even go close to on awakening, but I have to be honest your post made my head hurt.

I found it extremely interesting, and I will return to it, as soon as my old brain is willing to lift some of the shades, and let some sunlight in to its dark recesses.

I am determined to have a better understanding of what you have posted. It looks like you put a lot of thought into your post, and I want to understand it better. I will never be a genius mathematician, but your post may just help me at least understand the numbers.

Thanks.

U're very welcome🙏😊 Btw it's super simple once u get the basic concepts 😁👍lemme know if u have any questions😊

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn

originally posted by: Ahadu
I know, I saw it after the 4 hour window. The one on the picture is correct tho. Thanks for noticing 😃👍

The four hour window is actually a two hour window, and I swear sometimes I feel like it is less than even two hours.

Just sharing a little info that I wish I had known sooner.

Lol Ikr😆

a reply to: ahaduahaz

Thanks for your reply.

The first diagram is all positive because my model is my theory of how our universe came to exist. Like the standard model (my theory of) with diagrams.

I did used to draw it the way you questioned. But, it didn't explain the early epoch Planck inflation period.

So, a form of energy/light emerged as a set of three rapidly expanding, rotating dimensions (the "big bang"). Isotropic (same in each direction). All dimensions behaving the same way (i suspect an operator dim is responsible).

Even though the diagram clearly has labels defining the dimensions. It is from an observational reference point only. And you should consider that any direction you chose to observe would be up/forward away from the centre (source), in a positive manner. Regardless of my labels. Would represent the proton/s? This positive aspect remains throughout my diagrams.

The negative aspect is seen in the next diagram. After one complete rotation with expansion. Where, the positive aspect travels along its dim away from the centre, in the same direction. Meanwhile. the dim is rotating. E.g. If we take the up aspect. As up travels away from the centre, so does down, as a partner pair (duality). As the H dim rotates. The up and down aspects are rotated to their anti positions. Up now in down, down now in up. The positive aspect now also in an anti position and, was always travelling in the same direction away from centre, is now travelling from an "outer position" back towards the centre. Is an anti- proton (electron) and negative. It would look similar to the old video arcade games where a spaceship would travel away out of the top of screen to reappear from the bottom of the screen while still travelling the same direction but, now travelling inwards.

In quaternions. The term i/j/k are just 3 letters with no meaning as such. They are dimensions. They all behave the same way. But represented as (-1, 0 1). Where -1 is the square of 1. This is a squaring by rotation of the dim. 90 deg x 90 deg = 180 deg = half spin/rotation. My example is from the view of L/H/W dims. Replace -1 = down, 0 = centre, 1 = up.

a reply to: ahaduahaz

honestly tho u'r approach is a bit confusing.🤷‍♂️😅

It is very difficult trying to explain and make understandable to others, something which should actually be very simple.

Our approaches are different. They also have similarities too.

My model is meant to describe a 3d and 4d space/object of energy (EM), and how, why and what happens within that system. It was even more confusing in the early attempts. All i had was the shapes full of +/- symbols that define things (particles) at entangled/connected points, but none were defined (labelled). It has been a long journey of discovery. And i still struggle with these labels. I accept that i may make errors (in labelling). And i will accept being corrected.

I also thought i discovered a complete math form, as opposed to what i consider incomplete binary math form in my model (did a thread). Where (1, 0, -1) can describe something complete. E.g. 1 = up, 0 = height dim, -1 = down (0 can also be 1/2 as it is the centre or half of length point of the dim/axis). 1 and -1 carry information in a waveform. O is a gluon, and upon annihilation of the wave (observation), represents the info being carried by 1 and -1 (two halves of info to make a complete).

0 or 1/2 is a singularity and the source point of the system. 1 and -1 are a duality. They are particle pairs. They hold/carry info. And the three dims L/H/W are a triality.

The next e.g. is simplified. (1, 0, -1) where 1 = heads, 0 = coin, -1 = tails. It is far more complicated though. It is useful to describe a coin. But the coin has many more aspects to consider which are not included in the simplified e.g. These other aspects would be included by using +/- fractals, +/- decimal points or +/- percentages in between 1 and -1. Someone pointed out that this sounded like balanced ternary. And it does.

This equation is what i use to explain my model. I have replaced i/j/k for L/H/W.



You're using numbers and sequences to describe your model. I'm interested in the C@9 system. You add numbers down to a single digit. Unfortunately, my model has something similar and i don't like it. It makes it look like numerology, it makes it look like coincidence or pareidolia. But, it is there and does satisfy. It however is based on the number 18 and the different ways of multiplication to = 18. They form tables of connection/entanglement points between the +/- aspects of the pair particles of the dims within the system. The tables are components and create shapes within the cube a little different from some of your shapes used in your model and represent DE, DM, the gravitational effect and the forces. 18 for me represents 3d. Where a set of 3 particle pairs of (1, 0, -1) (f/w, b/w of L), (up, down of H) and (right, left of W) create an entangled hyper-space/object of energy.

The next diagram is the 2nd hyper-sphere image from above reply with a little more detail. And sorry it's messy. Not only does it include the (1, 0, -1)s as partner pairs of the dimensions (seen around the outer with centre being 0. And although 1 = up and -1 = down, you must consider that down can also be positive meaning up would be negative. This is accounted for as each aspect up, down etc contains an -electron/+proton pair (not labelled as such). - is electron + is proton. Edit. 18 = 6 x - electrons, 6 x + protons and 6 gluons. This changes to 24 after the transform from sphere to cube. 24 = 8 x - electrons, 8 x + positrons and 8 gluons.



I don't know if this will add to the confusion. I hope you can understand it better though. It is actually simple and nothing more than entanglement/connections created by rotation and expansion of energy to create more points and different states of energy we describe as something (labels).

a reply to: ahaduahaz

I understand how confusing my explanations can seem.

This youtube poster has a series of (approx 5 min) video's explaining much of what i have been saying. I've watched 10 of them yesterday. 3 more to see. The vids are titled... Imaginary Numbers are Real parts 1 to 13.

www.youtube.com...

This is part 1 to get you started.

www.youtube.com...