It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
Aussie Nurse Sounds Alarm: The Campaign Against Covid-19 Really is a “Spiritual War”
. . .
Are we being desensitized to be targeted at the head and also causing potential health issues by aiming an infrared ray to the pineal gland? So I started taking the temperature on the wrist, which turned out to be more accurate . . .
www.mcgill.ca...
The laser you see on some devices does not detect temperature; it exists to make sure the user is pointing the device correctly.
...
They are not meant to be used in the direct sunlight, because the Sun will warm up your forehead and bias the reading. Sweat on your brow can artificially lower the temperature that is measured, essentially disguising a fever. There is actually a significant list of reasons why these infrared thermometers can miss a fever: circulatory problems, previous injuries, heavy makeup, certain drugs. On the other hand, the device might tell you you are feverish even though you’re not because of stress, physical activity, nicotine, a hot beverage, hormonal treatments, pregnancy, hot air currents or even a sunburn. And we can easily imagine a scenario in which someone is contagious with COVID and is taking anti-fever medicine like acetaminophen, which will bring their temperature down.
These are the built-in pitfalls of forehead infrared thermometers.
www.tandfonline.com...
A metrological assessment of nine common NCITs was carried out over the temperature range of 15–45 °C using the National Physical Laboratory’s blackbody reference sources to identify their accuracy, repeatability, size-of-source and distance effects. The results are concerning in that five of the NCITs fell far outside the accuracy range stated by their manufacturers as well as the medical standard to which the NCITs are supposed to adhere.
they're actually very useless in a barbershop
originally posted by: Kester
www.fda.gov...
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
Aussie Nurse Sounds Alarm: The Campaign Against Covid-19 Really is a “Spiritual War”
. . .
Are we being desensitized to be targeted at the head and also causing potential health issues by aiming an infrared ray to the pineal gland? So I started taking the temperature on the wrist, which turned out to be more accurate . . .
Apparently you need a laser sight for accuracy. Sounds like pinpoint accuracy to the pineal.
www.mcgill.ca...
The laser you see on some devices does not detect temperature; it exists to make sure the user is pointing the device correctly.
...
They are not meant to be used in the direct sunlight, because the Sun will warm up your forehead and bias the reading. Sweat on your brow can artificially lower the temperature that is measured, essentially disguising a fever. There is actually a significant list of reasons why these infrared thermometers can miss a fever: circulatory problems, previous injuries, heavy makeup, certain drugs. On the other hand, the device might tell you you are feverish even though you’re not because of stress, physical activity, nicotine, a hot beverage, hormonal treatments, pregnancy, hot air currents or even a sunburn. And we can easily imagine a scenario in which someone is contagious with COVID and is taking anti-fever medicine like acetaminophen, which will bring their temperature down.
These are the built-in pitfalls of forehead infrared thermometers.
www.tandfonline.com...
A metrological assessment of nine common NCITs was carried out over the temperature range of 15–45 °C using the National Physical Laboratory’s blackbody reference sources to identify their accuracy, repeatability, size-of-source and distance effects. The results are concerning in that five of the NCITs fell far outside the accuracy range stated by their manufacturers as well as the medical standard to which the NCITs are supposed to adhere.
They're crap at measuring temperature but they're used with pinpoint accuracy on the pineal.
There could be any kind of ray emanating from them, how would we know?
originally posted by: a325nt
I own one of these laser thermometers- it's an IR LED and a red laser pointer, and it runs on three volts battery power.
Don't shine it in your eye and you'll be fine.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: chr0naut
Are you being sarcastic? I ask this because you post spiritual stuff....
originally posted by: Kester
www.fda.gov...
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...
Aussie Nurse Sounds Alarm: The Campaign Against Covid-19 Really is a “Spiritual War”
. . .
Are we being desensitized to be targeted at the head and also causing potential health issues by aiming an infrared ray to the pineal gland? So I started taking the temperature on the wrist, which turned out to be more accurate . . .
Apparently you need a laser sight for accuracy. Sounds like pinpoint accuracy to the pineal.
www.mcgill.ca...
The laser you see on some devices does not detect temperature; it exists to make sure the user is pointing the device correctly.
...
They are not meant to be used in the direct sunlight, because the Sun will warm up your forehead and bias the reading. Sweat on your brow can artificially lower the temperature that is measured, essentially disguising a fever. There is actually a significant list of reasons why these infrared thermometers can miss a fever: circulatory problems, previous injuries, heavy makeup, certain drugs. On the other hand, the device might tell you you are feverish even though you’re not because of stress, physical activity, nicotine, a hot beverage, hormonal treatments, pregnancy, hot air currents or even a sunburn. And we can easily imagine a scenario in which someone is contagious with COVID and is taking anti-fever medicine like acetaminophen, which will bring their temperature down.
These are the built-in pitfalls of forehead infrared thermometers.
www.tandfonline.com...
A metrological assessment of nine common NCITs was carried out over the temperature range of 15–45 °C using the National Physical Laboratory’s blackbody reference sources to identify their accuracy, repeatability, size-of-source and distance effects. The results are concerning in that five of the NCITs fell far outside the accuracy range stated by their manufacturers as well as the medical standard to which the NCITs are supposed to adhere.
They're crap at measuring temperature but they're used with pinpoint accuracy on the pineal.
There could be any kind of ray emanating from them, how would we know?