It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Assassin82
It's all in what you choose to believe. As far as the stories in the Bible being rubbish, well, nobody can prove that.
originally posted by: Assassin82
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Assassin82
It's all in what you choose to believe. As far as the stories in the Bible being rubbish, well, nobody can prove that.
Nobody can prove it’s not rubbish either. It’s a book of mystery and fairy tales based on half truths and corrupted interpretations of historical events.
The flood myth likely relates to the flooding of the Black Sea 7500 years ago.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: 727Sky
Sumerian, indian, european (ie, greeks, and the meditaranean/holy land folks) and baltics all have flood myths that are similar, and all likely relate to the black sea event.
The important part is their language. They all are indoeuropean (or were, prior to arabs). The only real hang up with this is language analysis places the break up of indoeuropean languages around 4k years ago. So there is a disparate analysis between geologists and linguists. But there are some signs that this gap could be shrunk as time goes on.
Here's a really good piece on this topic:
www.smithsonianmag.com...
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: 727Sky
Sumerian, indian, european (ie, greeks, and the meditaranean/holy land folks) and baltics all have flood myths that are similar, and all likely relate to the black sea event.
The important part is their language. They all are indoeuropean (or were, prior to arabs). The only real hang up with this is language analysis places the break up of indoeuropean languages around 4k years ago. So there is a disparate analysis between geologists and linguists. But there are some signs that this gap could be shrunk as time goes on.
Here's a really good piece on this topic:
www.smithsonianmag.com...
There's your simple explanation as occam would have it.
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: 727Sky
Was writing even devolved 20k years ago. What did these ice age people write on?
originally posted by: Assassin82
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: 727Sky
Was writing even devolved 20k years ago. What did these ice age people write on?
Ice. Obviously.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: 727Sky
Sumerian, indian, european (ie, greeks, and the meditaranean/holy land folks) and baltics all have flood myths that are similar, and all likely relate to the black sea event.
The important part is their language. They all are indoeuropean (or were, prior to arabs). The only real hang up with this is language analysis places the break up of indoeuropean languages around 4k years ago. So there is a disparate analysis between geologists and linguists. But there are some signs that this gap could be shrunk as time goes on.
Here's a really good piece on this topic:
www.smithsonianmag.com...
There's your simple explanation as occam would have it.
North America has the flood legends as well.
www.uwosh.edu...
Their language was different but they appear to have a story that has the common cause (evil) and a boat (raft) made of wood. Also an alternate to the dove mentioned in the biblical account.
It's similar to how the Jewish people didnt have a flood myth until after Jewish scribes were put to work in Babylon during their exile there. Only after being freed by Cyrus did the Noah story come into being. It's far more likely that.its based on the Epic of Gilgamesh than they suddenly remembered Noah.
originally posted by: Phage
Various floods.
Various places.
Lots of other cautionary tales, as well.