It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
They don't even have to be fraudulent votes. They can just takes bags of votes from areas that are traditionally red and sit on them. Then "find" them after the results are in.
Or the other tactic we've seen used in California is to "find" bags of votes in trunks and storage units that were accidentally misplaced. Or use both tactics and you can swing 12k votes in the blink of eye.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Wow. A whole 12k votes in California? That will surely ruin Trump's chances there.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: face23785
He didn't say '12k cases of voter fraud', he said '12k votes'. Try reading next time.
originally posted by: face23785
The scenario he was talking about was clearly fraud.
originally posted by: aeroscrog
12k = 20% of the votes cast, and that is just the ballots where the signatures were deemed obvious forgeries, so could be even higher.
20% of the vote is very significant.
originally posted by: aeroscrog
Face mentioned a concern about swing states, not California, but the point is that an organized dem controlled criminal operation stole at least 20% of the vote in a district that dems would easily win without cheating.
originally posted by: aeroscrog
1/5, as the article puts it, means exactly the same thing as 20%
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: carewemust
Republican election fraud, good catch.