Snopes says Hillary Clinton didn't appear in court 6/2

originally posted by: loveguy
audio transcript 6-2-2020
There's two to choose from.
🙄
Teleconference.

a reply to: Flesh699

There you go, they were showing a replay of the 2015 hearings because there was nothing to show from the 6/2/2020 court appearance.

a reply to: Flesh699
Snopes,wikipedia all controlled information,wouldn't listen to them they follow a false narrative,and the Clintons and the rest of rich have been missing from public,I'm sure tipped off of disaster we will undergo ,we are Fed and media could care less

a reply to: Flesh699

Witch court date would that be?
Which level/district court?

Some court proceedings are not
made public.
SAAVY?

it was explained but wow that was quite the stretch to shoe horn that hillary was in court in 2020..I thought we were to deny ignorance here...not embrace it with open arms

reply to: Wildmanimal

originally posted by: Wildmanimal
a reply to: Flesh699

Witch court date would that be?
Which level/district court?

Some court proceedings are not
made public.
SAAVY?

SAAVY.

Maybe they're setting up a claim that this trial never took place. Perhaps they will deny the trial and deny it when she's sitting behind bars. She never showed up to prison lol

originally posted by: SolAquarius
He who controls the fact checkers controls the facts.

I didn't know about juneteenth until the day it happened and it was being treated like it was always a known holiday.

I guess We live in a age of information gaslighting

The Juneteenth was mentioned on here I saw it on a calendar at my work printed. It was the first time that I ever saw it.

originally posted by: loveguy
audio transcript 6-2-2020
There's two to choose from.
🙄
Teleconference.

These are nuts. I don't understand how the democratic party still exists after listening to those. Well, I lied, I do understand. Pathetic.

Snopes playing damage control for hill dog. One truth and two lies, seem about right for a fact checking business.

a reply to: Flesh699

For mine as soon as the d*ck who is sat there as a witness etc. who is supposed to be alert, switched on & focused so as to not misinterpret or misunderstand so much as a single word, starts to look anywhere but directly at the questioner that signals a smug arrogance that had it been me asking the questions I doubt I would've been controlled enough to not launch a chair at the lying filth doing it.
*edit* & the desk for that matter seeing as it was HRC. Who here believes she will be physically in attendance come Sept. now Mrs. evil personified couldn't buy her way out of her predicament ?

Bill's probably Monika Lewinskying his way through corridors of power as we speak so the cuck can help his master.jail 'em both !!

fact checker fact checking fact checkers

a reply to: research100

How so?
Shoehorn?
You are extrapolating.

Ha, if you only had
any clue.

The S is about to hit the fan.