It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: atlantean
Well, at least the person filming it, holds the award for the most steady camera operation for an entire minute.
Which makes me believe it’s fake. Why was he filming in the first place?
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: fromtheskydown
Good point.
We need more context before jumping to conclusions
Thank you.
originally posted by: atlantean
a reply to: fromtheskydown Well said pal
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: fromtheskydown
Good point.
We need more context before jumping to conclusions
Thank you.
originally posted by: Baddogma
My vote is "ball lightening" (whatever that really is) or an other sort of unknown.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: ufoorbhunter
If you want to call unknown luminous intelligence "Angels," then go ahead. It's a label with a pedigree.
That label is overloaded with bad dogma, but the added dogmas aren't the fault of the label. It's the fault of poor information gathering systems we label "human."
We can call an unknown by a name... but that doesn't necessarily make it a "known."
originally posted by: Blue Shift
Honestly? It looked fake to me. Don't know why or how they would do it, but that glow coming off the thing looks way too "After Effects-y". And then there's the way the thing "played" at the camera. Flags. Red.
Just my opinion from having seen hundreds of UFO films and video by this time.