Let's Talk About the Royal Family

Ill preface this by saying this theory only works if the royal family had a hand in Princess Dianna's death.  

So lets pretend that's the case

www.express.co.uk...

In this article it claims that the Queen was shy around Dianna, at least when young William and Harry were with them.

The Queen didn't agree with Diana's hands on approach to parenting saying that they all kinds of housemaids to do stuff like that, and for that reason she was shy, not frigid according to Sarah Bradford, Viscountess Bangor.

Ok so you don't agree with the parenting style of someone, can you be courteous at least instead of shy or frigid?

I find that weird.

Your the Queen of England ffs.

Instead of shy however what if the Queen was upset, thereby not shy but actually frigid?

Why would she be upset? 

I never thought of this before today but what if Dianna's constant presence got in the way of the Royal staffers teaching the future the Kingdom how the world is actually run? Just a thought.

I think Dianna was always too much of a wildcard for the Royal family to let in on the most secretive secrets.  Clearly Charles never loved her and was deeply in love with Camilla Bowles.

Dianna I am sure did not have top level clearance.

But William needed to know the secrets and the same with Harry in case William was sterile.

Dodi Fayed was obviously with the wrong girl, at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Debate the racism angle or not but let's assume for the sake of this story that the Royal family did have a hand to play in Dianna and Dodi's deaths.

William and Harry were super close to their mother not necessarily their father, what if they think the Royal family had a hand to play in their mother's death?

Their grandmother is their grandmother but their mother is their mom.

What if William and Harry are playing the Royals and remaking the kingdom their way in front of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles living eyes?

If not take them down all together.

Harry marries a woman of color in Megan Markle and then William and him have a falling out.

Harry and Megan then claim harassment from the media rags make the decision to leave the inner Royal circle and move to another continent - with the Queen's newborn grandson - to help his mixed race wife follow her dream.

He then dumps this all on the Queen, his hands off grandmother who he was allegedly so close to, and his father Prince Charles who was also allegedly very hands off.

It doesn't sound like William or Harry had the tightest relationships with their family.

www.thelist.com... nce-william-and-prince-charles-relationship/

Funny enough, Harry and William have both taken on a hands on approach to parenting following in their mothers footsteps.

So they grew up with some humanity and warmth and are now presumably doing the same with their kids.

To the horror of the old guard it seemed.

Now the brothers are apparently on better terms which is nice I guess.

The perfect final cut would be if when William becomes king he abolishes the monarchy all together but I don't think anybody is that righteous.

Anyways, just a thought.

a reply to: Phayte

The perfect final cut would be if when William becomes king he abolishes the monarchy all together

The Monarchy have no power to abolish.

It can only be done by An Act Of Parliament .

a reply to: Phayte

The monarchy is about as useful as balls on a priest.

Can’t believe you folks still tolerate them.

I thought William, like his dad, has a side piece that he likes better then his hot-hot-hottie wife

If you every read crazy days and nights, Megan was a straight up....let’s say the opposite of: Pepsi virgin

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Phayte

The monarchy is about as useful as balls on a priest.

Can’t believe you folks still tolerate them.

And still more useful than you. Go figure.

What would you like to know?Ask this guy I guess..take it anyway you wish entertainment value is your choice.

www.bing.com... &FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fsp%3D-1%26pq%3Dhidden%2Bking%2Bof%2Bengland%26sc%3D3-22%26sk%3D%26cvid%3D10660551B14F4FBE97D6EB08CFF7C08A%26q%3Dh idden%2Bking%2Bof%2Bengland%26qft%3D%2Bfilterui%3Avideoage-lt10080%26FORM%3DVRFLTR


Oh that pesky issue of DNA just wont go away will it?....LMRAO.

William did not stand and sign the marriage register when Harry and Meghan got married. He stood...but only to let Charles out. Then he sat back down with Camilla and Catherine. Only Charles and Doria signed the marriage registrar.

Contrast this with William and Catherine's wedding. All the Middletons stood and left to sign it (Carole, Michael, James, Pippa), and on William's side, there was Charles, Camilla, and Harry.

I think there's more to Harry's marriage than just a disappointed Princess Di wannabe. And I don't think William wants to be anywhere near Meghan. I get a sense that William is acting out of some understanding that she is a dangerous woman. I don't see the two brothers as in a position to be able to repair any hard feelings, right now.

The Clintons and Obamas interest in Meghan makes me all the more suspicious about what's really behind her as this catalyst for Harry giving up his birthright..how much will he give up? Will he relinquish his place in line?

That would move Archie up.

I have my theories...

I do think the earth under the Royal Family has been turfed up quite a bit over the last few years. It's always been a closed shop. Even when Diana was there, things seemed to flow along. Until she left Charles.
Once that happened I think her name was on 'the list' It was a case of when to do it, and where.

Diana showed her sons that just because you are a Royal, it doesn't mean you have to follow all their ways. You can be compassionate, open and friendly with those not in the circle.

Personally I think William knows what's coming in the next few years for Harry. That's probably what they don't agree on and why there seems to be a rift between them.

I'm not against the Royal Family. Nor do I support them. I just wish they used their influence to help people during a crisis. Give people a little hope. A speech now and then would keep peoples spirits up.
I know the Queen did one recently, but I think she was told to do it, rather than wanting to do it herself.

You didn’t even mention randy Andies kiddy diddling...
I’m also of the opinion that a Monarchy in 2020 is idiotic.

Yeah lets not judge people by what they do or say, these guys have the ‘right’ blood, so they’ll be treated the opposite to everyone else.

They have a yacht that runs on taxpayer money. £35000 a day to keep it floating..
Indoctrination comes in many forms, Britain believing these people are ‘special’ is one of the greatest on-going scams of this era.

originally posted by: GreenGunther
You didn’t even mention randy Andies kiddy diddling...
I’m also of the opinion that a Monarchy in 2020 is idiotic.

Yeah lets not judge people by what they do or say, these guys have the ‘right’ blood, so they’ll be treated the opposite to everyone else.

They have a yacht that runs on taxpayer money. £35000 a day to keep it floating..
Indoctrination comes in many forms, Britain believing these people are ‘special’ is one of the greatest on-going scams of this era.

I think Harry wanting to leave the Royal farce might has something to do with Andrew. A bombshell will hit the Royal Family soon I feel, and I think he just wants to be clear when it hits.
Doesn't the Royal train cost thousands to maintain? Even though it's hardly used.

Don't get wrong I love my country, but peope are very brainwashed when it comes to the Royals. They can do no wrong. Try saying something against the Queen on Social Media. Trust me it's not a pretty sight.

a reply to: GreenGunther

I’m also of the opinion that a Monarchy in 2020 is idiotic.

The majority of British, Canadian, Australian and New Zealander's want to keep The Monarchy. So your opinion is out of step.

They have a yacht that runs on taxpayer money. £35000 a day to keep it floating.

You're out of date mate. The Royal Family haven't had a yacht since 1997.

Britannia was decommissioned on 11 December 1997.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: rhynouk

Doesn't the Royal train cost thousands to maintain? Even though it's hardly used.

No. It is privately owned and not funded by The Tax Payer.

As part of the privatisation of British Rail. ownership passed to Railtrack.[22] It is currently owned by Network Rail.

en.wikipedia.org...

More anti Royal Propaganda.

originally posted by: rhynouk

I'm not against the Royal Family. Nor do I support them. I just wish they used their influence to help people during a crisis. Give people a little hope. A speech now and then would keep peoples spirits up.
I know the Queen did one recently, but I think she was told to do it, rather than wanting to do it herself.

Here's an interview Prince Charles did a couple of days ago for Sky News UK. Really insightful ....


Rainbows
Jane

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: rhynouk

Doesn't the Royal train cost thousands to maintain? Even though it's hardly used.

No. It is privately owned and not funded by The Tax Payer.

As part of the privatisation of British Rail. ownership passed to Railtrack.[22] It is currently owned by Network Rail.

en.wikipedia.org...

More anti Royal Propaganda.

Fair enough mate, I wasn't sure. I could have looked it up myself but was lazy. Cheers for the information.

originally posted by: Phayte
Ill preface this by saying this theory only works if the royal family had a hand in Princess Dianna's death.  

Two words: Richard Tomlinson.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: GreenGunther

I’m also of the opinion that a Monarchy in 2020 is idiotic.

The majority of British, Canadian, Australian and New Zealander's want to keep The Monarchy. So your opinion is out of step.

They have a yacht that runs on taxpayer money. £35000 a day to keep it floating.

You're out of date mate. The Royal Family haven't had a yacht since 1997.

Britannia was decommissioned on 11 December 1997.

en.wikipedia.org...

They shall have their King.

a reply to: alldaylong


I did mention indoctrination did I not?

The odd thing re. the royal yacht is that it was the price for running it in 2007.
Saw it on a discovery channel show about yachts, but now it's like it never existed.

Wonder if they made it disappear due to orgy island related trips.

More digging shall be required.