-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XXV-

a reply to: CanadianMason

First and last listen to Steinbart for me.
I just read his indictment... He's been indicted. Saying he hasn't been is.. wackadoo. I don't believe he wasn't fed for 3 days in a deep box either. I do believe he's getting a divorce, probably not for the reasons given... I hope he gets the mental help he needs.

Day 888 of the Q-uarantine and my thought for the day.

We've seen the docs connecting DJT to the DOJ, Rudy, Comey and the New Jersey Mob take down in the 80's, and subseQuent work in same or similar in NY.

What did DJT name his Casino?

Times up. The Taj Mahal.

What totally inappropriate name for a Casino unless said building was really a Honey Pot designed to entomb the mobsters?

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: GATruthseeker
Has anybody seen this yet? I'm having very serious issues with Twitter lately so hopefully this link works. But it is a Twitter user named BusyalltheTime - has to do with stringers connecting to Wikileaks emails.


twitter.com...


Looked very promising but Twitter keeps freezing up on me so wasn't able to read too much of it.

From the thread link...

Thanks for posting this. Technology has not been my friend lately. I really wanted to make sure Rel saw it & any others who can play around with it.

link

originally posted by: crankyoldman

link

Q re-iterated it the same day the indictment was signed.

a reply to: Quadrivium

Quad, I think the discovery is important but I won't be diverting my efforts to do all the looking up of individual links from stringers to wikileaks emails...

The reason is that I see my role as passing on sign posts, from decoding, rather than doing a road trip video of where that leads. It appears that I m a single point of failure on the majority of the systematic decoding of tweets/posts, so if I stop doing that you all lose a lot of the map road signs.

There's a lot of peeps with better skills than me to follow up those links to wikileak emails.

What I WILL attempt to do though is to automate generation of the MD5 keys of STRINGERs, in a new s/sheet tab, that will bring up the relevant email...

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Has anybody analysed the Q map sites? Are they also housed on DoD servers?

The reason for asking is that I want to understand if it's part of Q team who are assigning the post TITLES on http:// qmap.pub.

Qmap.pub

Note: This website is not created by Q. This website is created by an anon, just like you, who happens to be a developer. This website functions as an "aggregator" that sources Q's posts from 8ch/8kun (the singular comm channel that Q uses). This website sources other data from other anons who maintain lists (indictments, resignations, child trafficking, etc.)

qmap.pub...

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Thanks for that EMN... could you do one of those whois checks on the servers just to confirm not on DoD servers though, as "disnformation is necessary" and, from what I've seen, there are often anons/developers on /qresearch who are actually part of Q team.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: queenofswords

Same here. Enjoying the cast of characters in this on-going drama.

So, update: Warrant Returned Executed

That means he has definitely been arrested and the details of the warrant have been returned to the court.

Apparently they put him in an ankle bracelet, too. He tells the story in the video below:

That was revealing. All his electronic devices were confiscated and his home ransacked, including tearing up insulation in his attic. FBI don't mess around, do they? Now he has no internet connection and only a flip phone.

Also, that US Atty assigned to his case doesn't mess around either. Anybody that assisted A.S. in that Datto "project" better be looking over their shoulder. Oops!

"Be careful who you follow." Wouldn't it be wild if Q were to post that reminder today (assuming HE still has internet access.).

Or, this one:

Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?

Q has posted that one at least four or five times.

Thank you for being open minded. You usually bring one.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Justoneman
I've been reading with amazement (for a month), how members in this thread let their egos battle over whether that Baby-Q guy (what's his name...Austin?) is worth listening to or not.

I thought Q told us to "think for ourselves".

To me, part of that advice means letting each person think what they want to think. About Q, God, Trump, baby-Q, whatever...

Fair enough.

I can take that with a grain of salt. I just never saw a real list that would shut it down after the no coms.

For me I only care what the real truth is and if it means only Q fine. But Q could bail us out and just say no such thing and it is over.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: PioneerFigureSkating
a reply to: Justoneman

Bookmark all my posts if you want. If you go back to the very first time dude was brought up in this thread I was the very first response to the query. The very next post. I said it then and I say it now that the dude is a fraud.

Bookmark whatever you want. It makes zero difference to me.

Come on please, I beg you to help us all out and give an example of something you can point to that will show he is a shill please, that is all i ask. You are not Silly ol me and have one right?


I recall you stated anecdotes but just gut feelings. I need data. By now you know I am a data person and I like to study the data. Your feelings have no data attached and it would make this easier if it did. That is that state of this situation. I should read on ahead since I laid this out for us to build upon ( a list of pros and cons).

JOM, if I may. The problem here is few if any here - lurkers too, are interested in it enough to watch the videos, dissect the information and then talk about it. Frankly maybe management can put a thread in RATS for it, devoted to it entirely.

This is a devoted Q thread, with DJT Q+ tweets and others working the MAP and information from there. The AS thing is an entirely separate thing, which folks have decided isn't worth the effort - babyq or not. Me included.

This is why folks are annoyed. They have little to no information and each time it is brought up it devolves into "is he q or not?"

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: carewemust

I thought Q told us to "think for ourselves". To me, part of that advice means letting each person think what they want to think. About Q, God, Trump, baby-Q, whatever...

I couldn't agree with this statement more. I don't need someone repeating the same opinions over and over. I need data points like justoneman. When someone tells me not to look, you better believe I'm gonna look and I'm gonna look closer than if I wasn't told.

Yellow Brick Road , Yellow Brick Road To follow it was what I was told So I do as I'm told ... But I still don't know

5:55


Failed Escape - Epiphany

NYTimes

So it appears that the answer to my earlier question (will people ignore this too?) appears to be yes. Let's get an updated count on how many posts this fraud has been the subject of now vs one of our known bad guys.

The obvious play is obvious. Steinbart got himself into trouble, and I believe he did this purposefully, meanwhile a certain segment of posters have tried their level best to make sure this guy is tied to Q. Flatly ignoring every single example proving why exactly this guy is a fraud ("billionaire" hires public defender. lol).

Why? So when this dude gets his comeuppance folks can tie the "crazy guy" to the Q movement even though it's very clear that the majority of people here have rejected this guy's claims every step of the way.

This entire sideshow has been absolutely shameful.

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: CanadianMason

First and last listen to Steinbart for me.
I just read his indictment... He's been indicted. Saying he hasn't been is.. wackadoo. I don't believe he wasn't fed for 3 days in a deep box either. I do believe he's getting a divorce, probably not for the reasons given... I hope he gets the mental help he needs.

Baaaahahahaaa! He was a dumba$$ and I've been saying it since he popped up.

Any link to the whole court/divorce story?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Very rarely post, very active lurker, thank you !!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The divorce is in the interview. He says it's just a paper divorce so the FBI cannot get to his wife or assets (He has no assets. He was assigned a Public Defender). I'm sure he's trying to get ahead of that story. If the FBI was going to prosecute her to get to him, their marital status would not matter. A paper divorce would not reduce their leverage.
Someone posted the link to court docs earlier. I highlighted a few excerpts up thread.I
Like I said about the guy earlier before all this, "if this doesn't set off your alarm bells, you should check and make sure they work"

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Thanks for that EMN... could you do one of those whois checks on the servers just to confirm not on DoD servers though, as "disnformation is necessary" and, from what I've seen, there are often anons/developers on /qresearch who are actually part of Q team.

None of the Q drop servers have DoD network IP's from what I seen in traces. Nothing suspicious either.

8kun (including DNS) is hosted by VDSINA VDS Hosting (Russia)

Why we decided NOT to block 8chan/8kun but host them instead

a reply to: PioneerFigureSkating

meanwhile a certain segment of posters have tried their level best to make sure this guy is tied to Q.

Actually, I couldn't find a single post or poster that said this guy is tied to Q. Some thought his sudden appearance, his odd videos, and his boasts were intriguing enough to investigate, and thought the discussion was valid. But, I saw no one attempting to "move" from 8kun-Q to Austin-Q.

Isn't that what the real Q movement and the GA is all about? Evaluate, discern, and decide? You can't decide until you evaluate and discern. We have been admonished to think for ourselves from the beginning. WWG1WGA does not mean we leave our brains at the door.

Nobody that participates in Dashen's threads and, especially those that have participated since Part I on a regular basis, would ever take or attempt to take that process away from others.

"Skeet!"

@DigitalTrends

Drones that can detect fevers and coughing will soon take to the sky.

twitter.com...

Brought to you by "Draganfly" - CANADIAN Aircraft manufacturing company.
Least not made in China, I think.