It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
Has anyone pointed out that it's possible this woman didn't get infected treating patients, that the protective measures in fact did work, and that she just got infected some other way when she wasn't at work? Community transmission appears to be confirmed. How do we know she didn't just come into contact with an infected person during her time off?
I know, I know, no one wants to hear that because it doesn't induce the amount of fear most in these threads seem to thrive on.
originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: FredT
Nobody is stopping you from going to the Northern California Kaiser Hospital.
I'm sure you being very very experienced and very very dedicated to the care, curing and comfort of our fellow man, they will welcome you with open arms.
Please provide the details of your caring for the people with CoVID19.
We await your thread.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: face23785
??? We dont know how many cases we have.. just how many are showing up in the hospitals sick and then trying to trace back who they came in contact with..
We might never know if this nurse contracted it. She might spend her time in quarantine without any symptom and just go back to work after the quarantine time has ended.
While in some other countries, they are going out of their way to test the people.
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
originally posted by: face23785
Has anyone pointed out that it's possible this woman didn't get infected treating patients, that the protective measures in fact did work, and that she just got infected some other way when she wasn't at work? Community transmission appears to be confirmed. How do we know she didn't just come into contact with an infected person during her time off?
I know, I know, no one wants to hear that because it doesn't induce the amount of fear most in these threads seem to thrive on.
People aren't understanding that it can live on surfaces (including on PPE) for 9 days. A cough can send droplets 6-9 feet away. Which minimum wage janitor do you trust to disinfect Every. Single. Hard surface. In the hospital?
After you remove your PPE and wash up... You gotta touch something on the way out...
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
originally posted by: face23785
Has anyone pointed out that it's possible this woman didn't get infected treating patients, that the protective measures in fact did work, and that she just got infected some other way when she wasn't at work? Community transmission appears to be confirmed. How do we know she didn't just come into contact with an infected person during her time off?
I know, I know, no one wants to hear that because it doesn't induce the amount of fear most in these threads seem to thrive on.
People aren't understanding that it can live on surfaces (including on PPE) for 9 days. A cough can send droplets 6-9 feet away. Which minimum wage janitor do you trust to disinfect Every. Single. Hard surface. In the hospital?
After you remove your PPE and wash up... You gotta touch something on the way out...
People do understand this, including me. Do you understand it's entirely possible she contracted the disease elsewhere?
Have there been a rash of healthcare worker cases that I'm unaware of here in the US of all the workers that have been treating the infected? Because it sounds like this woman is a one-off.
If it was as easy to get infected as ya'll think, and none of the protective measures work, all the doctors and nurses that have been treating these people should be getting sick right about now.
We brought over 100 people with the virus here in late January. It's been over a month. Why aren't all the healthcare workers that cared for these people, probably numbering in the hundreds, getting sick?
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
originally posted by: face23785
Has anyone pointed out that it's possible this woman didn't get infected treating patients, that the protective measures in fact did work, and that she just got infected some other way when she wasn't at work? Community transmission appears to be confirmed. How do we know she didn't just come into contact with an infected person during her time off?
I know, I know, no one wants to hear that because it doesn't induce the amount of fear most in these threads seem to thrive on.
People aren't understanding that it can live on surfaces (including on PPE) for 9 days. A cough can send droplets 6-9 feet away. Which minimum wage janitor do you trust to disinfect Every. Single. Hard surface. In the hospital?
After you remove your PPE and wash up... You gotta touch something on the way out...
People do understand this, including me. Do you understand it's entirely possible she contracted the disease elsewhere?
Have there been a rash of healthcare worker cases that I'm unaware of here in the US of all the workers that have been treating the infected? Because it sounds like this woman is a one-off.
If it was as easy to get infected as ya'll think, and none of the protective measures work, all the doctors and nurses that have been treating these people should be getting sick right about now.
We brought over 100 people with the virus here in late January. It's been over a month. Why aren't all the healthcare workers that cared for these people, probably numbering in the hundreds, getting sick?
Because most health-care workers are aged 25-55 and not in the category that would likely show critical symptoms.
And there are LOTS of health care officials BEGGING for testing. They aren't giving tests out to be done.
Lack of positive testing does not equal lack of positive patients.
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
a reply to: face23785
Right here.
www.google.com...=true
Up to 30,000 have died from the "flu" this season alone so far between Oct 19 and Feb 1, 2020. 300,000+ cases.
How many you think were undiagnosed CV19?
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
a reply to: face23785
Based on incubation times.... Right about now...
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
a reply to: face23785
Current estimations put the far edges of incubation times out to 27 days...
Not just the cited 2-14...
We've known that for over 2 weeks now.
www.reuters.com... CN20G06W
I'm trying to stay civil... But back in the day, sources were everything. People really need to start backing up their opinions with research and sources on here when discussing a real-world pandemic...
originally posted by: YouAreLiedTo
a reply to: face23785
It was documented in a government report. The date of infection is known and the date of symptoms and testing are all known.
This isn't being presumptive.