Time Traveller, Yes, No Maybe ?

Was looking at some old Rolling Stones footage earlier, and i noticed a member of the audience who looks completely out of place for that time period ( 1964 ).

Tried to do a screenshot to highlight, but having problems. The chap i am pointing out appears at the 7.54 mark. He looks like a young Richard Branson.

Interestingly the song that he is applauding is titled " Time Is On My Side " Anyway, see what you think.

A 60's looking guy in the 60's. I don't see an issue.

originally posted by: schuyler
A 60's looking guy in the 60's. I don't see an issue.

That's a " No " from you then.

I also vote just another 60's guy. He probably heard hundreds of times, "Cut that hair. What, do you think you're a girl?" God Damn Hippies! Good times, narrow minds.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: schuyler
A 60's looking guy in the 60's. I don't see an issue.

That's a " No " from you then.

I didn't think it needed a translation.

a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I see what you mean. He looks like the only guy in the audience with long hair.

I agree with everyone else on the hippie. But you still might be onto something .

I’m 95% certain that the black chick is Loretta Lynch .

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I see what you mean. He looks like the only guy in the audience with long hair.

Therefore he must be a time traveler?

Question: Did any of you guys actually live in the sixties? Do you remember it?

a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I don't know if his a time traveler. But he does have a whole Kurt Cobain thing going on, which does seem a little out of place for the times.

It is kinda funny how you don't really see much blonde haired hippies in footage of the 60's though... but maybe that says more about the general personal hygiene of hippies than anything else.

a reply to: alldaylong

Great clip that one.....good ol Aussie Mick up the front there.......

Id say the young chap was a member of the Long Hair Society in 1964.

The spokes person of the group, was none other than David Jones.....ie David Bowie.



You learn something new every day on ATS.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I see what you mean. He looks like the only guy in the audience with long hair.

Therefore he must be a time traveler?

Question: Did any of you guys actually live in the sixties? Do you remember it?

Yup, and the guy in question ain't out of place...at all, et al, you've got it.

In edit, it's no wonder that Henry Ford did actually say that, "History is bunk"..and also, "History is almost bunk" or does it really matter,
I almost forgot...


files.abovetopsecret.com...

Looks just a little like one of my uncles.
In the 60s .
The start of the 70s craze . Peace , love , and rock n roll.
From an old dude .

originally posted by: Gothmog
Looks just a little like one of my uncles. In the 60s .The start of the 70s craze . Peace , love , and rock n roll. From an old dude .

That's just it. These youngsters weren't there yet think they know all about it. But just like Woodstock, if you remember it, you weren't really there. It's all so confusing, Rock on, time travelers.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I see what you mean. He looks like the only guy in the audience with long hair.

Therefore he must be a time traveler?

Question: Did any of you guys actually live in the sixties? Do you remember it?

I lived it.
I remember it.
The guy's hair was fairly normal for "groovy" guys.
The beard style not so much. Although I had a boyfriend with that beard shape.
However, that combo would still be possible to be found on a young man in the 1960's.

That said, his hair/beard combo would have not been out of place anytime, from the 60's up until today.
The cut was a little unusual for anytime, the neatly trimmed and even ends, normally in the 60's the ends would be scraggly. But still not out of place for the time.

The sweater was a tad unusual as a stand alone for that time period. But nothing so odd as to draw people's attention.

People would have looked at him and said "cool" if they were young, and he needs a haircut if they were married and settled.

So no, I'd say no time travel here.

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: alldaylong

Yeah, I see what you mean. He looks like the only guy in the audience with long hair.

In the early - mid 70s I was one of the very few guys in school with long hair.
Among say 10 of my closest friends , I was the only one.
Believe it , or not.

He had time time time on his siiiide..

But no from me.

Back in the day we called them "Early Adopters"
2nd line: No time traveler

ganjoa

a reply to: alldaylong

Oh look, a Rolling Stones fan that has the same hair style as Mick Jagger, only blonde, and has a hippy beard.



(That's a 'no' from me).

No one is going to comment on his left hand?

a reply to: schuyler
i was there but i can't remember it