Orthodox vs Roman Catholic

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

You do nt need to ! But you better buy what your Bible tells you or to hell you will be going ! Sad stuff man ! You were born free !

Here's what I know from experience. My life sucks when I dictate to God how I think my life should go and what role he should play in it. On the other hand, my life experiences exceed my expectations when I work on building my relationship with God first, incorporate his teachings, and trust him as Lord and Savior over my life and decisions. What can I say? It works and I can't remember the last time that God didn't answer one of my prayers.

May you find the host of host Many eyed many winged Ancient of days ! Jesus was a man like us ! He learned in the east like all before and after him ! Christianity is a eastern 3 side box religion

No harm or foul ! Good talk . In Christ always

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Answer my question ?

What question? Some rambling about a document that Rome has one copy of that they won't allow anyone to see? You believe you have some kind of authority or insight on that? LOL!

The sinaicontaticus is free to read ! We dont need the vatican copy

originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: joelr

ooohhhh, you gonna get in trouble bring up the henotheistic past of the hebrews!

True that

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: joelr

ooohhhh, you gonna get in trouble bring up the henotheistic past of the hebrews!

True that

Let them eat matzo !

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: joelr

ooohhhh, you gonna get in trouble bring up the henotheistic past of the hebrews!

True that

Let them eat matzo !

Yeah who was there Metatron ?

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: stormson
a reply to: joelr

ooohhhh, you gonna get in trouble bring up the henotheistic past of the hebrews!

True that

Let them eat matzo !

Yeah who was there Metatron ?

Remember ! There will be no peace until the last king is hung with the last priests intestines !

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Answer my question ?

What question? Some rambling about a document that Rome has one copy of that they won't allow anyone to see? You believe you have some kind of authority or insight on that? LOL!

The sinaicontaticus is free to read ! We dont need the vatican copy

Look at my thread name ! That will tell you what I am ! Wink wink H+H+H = 9 . Im the man to your right riding a pure beam of light ! Wait am I in the objective or subjective ? Im a donkey dentist for the Dogon Tribe ! My other home is on alligator face planet near Sirius ! Or Im in a underground government lab trying to make a fat guys heart explode by sending him Mc Donald suggestions via mind melding powers ! You should see my helmet ! Lol thx for the fun

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Why do the the church fathers not get the same immaculate treatment the west gives mary and the east denies in mary ! Yet both churches accept the bible as infallible!

There's nothing special about any of them outside of their roles as messengers for Jesus Christ. The Catholic church puts too much emphasis on Mary and saints that are close to idol worship in my opinion. Churches accept the Bible as being inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has inspired many people, including prophets throughout the entire Bible. I don't know why any church would place any of them in special order or recognition. The message is about Jesus and the works that he is capable of performing THROUGH us, including the inspiration for the Bible.

Albert Pike said all men need different functions of God based on their ability to comprehend on their own or have to be lead by their hand into the light ! If you got it figured out , thats great ! I know less and less daily !

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Why do the the church fathers not get the same immaculate treatment the west gives mary and the east denies in mary ! Yet both churches accept the bible as infallible!

There's nothing special about any of them outside of their roles as messengers for Jesus Christ. The Catholic church puts too much emphasis on Mary and saints that are close to idol worship in my opinion. Churches accept the Bible as being inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has inspired many people, including prophets throughout the entire Bible. I don't know why any church would place any of them in special order or recognition. The message is about Jesus and the works that he is capable of performing THROUGH us, including the inspiration for the Bible.

Albert Pike said all men need different functions of God based on their ability to comprehend on their own or have to be lead by their hand into the light ! If you got it figured out , thats great ! I know less and less daily !

We have billions of Christians , Jews and Muslims running over half the world with state socialism as the other half ! Minus Japan . I think its about time forca new egregore ! Dont you ! How many need to die with their books that claim they have divine right to rule all others ! No hermetic ever called for destruction ! We are devolving from the ancient truth through pride and hatred !

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Why do the the church fathers not get the same immaculate treatment the west gives mary and the east denies in mary ! Yet both churches accept the bible as infallible!

There's nothing special about any of them outside of their roles as messengers for Jesus Christ. The Catholic church puts too much emphasis on Mary and saints that are close to idol worship in my opinion. Churches accept the Bible as being inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has inspired many people, including prophets throughout the entire Bible. I don't know why any church would place any of them in special order or recognition. The message is about Jesus and the works that he is capable of performing THROUGH us, including the inspiration for the Bible.

Albert Pike said all men need different functions of God based on their ability to comprehend on their own or have to be lead by their hand into the light ! If you got it figured out , thats great ! I know less and less daily !

We have billions of Christians , Jews and Muslims running over half the world with state socialism as the other half ! Minus Japan . I think its about time forca new egregore ! Dont you ! How many need to die with their books that claim they have divine right to rule all others ! No hermetic ever called for destruction ! We are devolving from the ancient truth through pride and hatred !

Christ said to kill non believers also !

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: SulfurMercurySalt

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Why do the the church fathers not get the same immaculate treatment the west gives mary and the east denies in mary ! Yet both churches accept the bible as infallible!

There's nothing special about any of them outside of their roles as messengers for Jesus Christ. The Catholic church puts too much emphasis on Mary and saints that are close to idol worship in my opinion. Churches accept the Bible as being inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has inspired many people, including prophets throughout the entire Bible. I don't know why any church would place any of them in special order or recognition. The message is about Jesus and the works that he is capable of performing THROUGH us, including the inspiration for the Bible.

Albert Pike said all men need different functions of God based on their ability to comprehend on their own or have to be lead by their hand into the light ! If you got it figured out , thats great ! I know less and less daily !

We have billions of Christians , Jews and Muslims running over half the world with state socialism as the other half ! Minus Japan . I think its about time forca new egregore ! Dont you ! How many need to die with their books that claim they have divine right to rule all others ! No hermetic ever called for destruction ! We are devolving from the ancient truth through pride and hatred !

Christ said to kill non believers also !

Bible drill time ! You can find it ! Im not teaching anymore !

a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

The sinaicontaticus is free to read ! We dont need the vatican copy

Yes, and I already pointed out to you how (with a link) that codex states that Jesus was born from a virgin, so I don't understand why you're repeating yourself.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

The sinaicontaticus is free to read ! We dont need the vatican copy

Yes, and I already pointed out to you how (with a link) that codex states that Jesus was born from a virgin, so I don't understand why you're repeating yourself.

call the Biblical archeological society ! I cant have this conversation if you reject facts ! Last time : One of two known oldest bibles on earth contain no support for virgin birth or resurrection! Thousands of experts have agreed what is original and what were later add ons ! Ok thanks guy

a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Likewise, I can't have this conversation if you reject your own freaking source! If there are thousands of experts who believe that the available source that you have given is wrong, than produce something to back up your claims, because so far, they are falling apart.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

Likewise, I can't have this conversation if you reject your own freaking source! If there are thousands of experts who believe that the available source that you have given is wrong, than produce something to back up your claims, because so far, they are falling apart.

Is Mark the oldest gospel ? Well yes it is ! Guess what ? He never mentions the virgin birth ! Strange I think ! This is singly the most important part of the Jesus story ! The next one is the resurrection! The gospels after Mark are multiple years past his written words ! So the way I see it is this : If the most public oldest bible we have has Marks words not mentioning Virgin birth or resurrection, then how can anything after that book that is different not be suspect ? Well Im far from alone on this issue ! Your operating in the dark with dim candles that only illuminate that which jives with your fear and ignorance. Not being mean ! I created a new thread for you on the Codex Sinaiticus for you ! This thread is about something completely different . I allowed you to rile my passions ! Im sorry I cant be a help to you ! In peace and Christ Amun

a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

While it is true that Mark does not include a birth narrative, this does not mean that he was either unaware of the truth about Jesus or denied the virgin conception. Eyewitnesses often omit important details because they either (1) have other concerns they want to highlight with greater priority, or (2) presume that the issue under question is already well understood. The gospel of Mark exhibits great influence from the Apostle Peter. In fact, the outline of Mark’s Gospel is very similar to the outline of Peter’s first sermon at Pentecost. According to the Papias, Mark was Peter’s scribe; his gospel is brief and focused. Like Peter’s sermon in Chapter 2 of the Book of Act’s, Mark is focused only on the public life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus. But Mark is not alone in omitting the birth narrative. John’s gospel is considered by scholars to be the last Gospel written. The prior three “synoptic Gospels” were already in circulation and the issue of the virgin conception had already been described in two of them. Yet John also omitted the birth narrative. Why? John clearly wanted to cover material that the other Gospel writers did not address; over 90% of the material in the Gospel of John is unique to the text. If John did not agree with the virgin conception as described in the Gospels of Matthew or Luke, he certainly had the opportunity to correct the matter in his own work. But John never does this; his silence serves as a presumption that the “virgin conception” has been accurately described by prior authors.

coldcasechristianity.com...

a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

By the way, the Old Testament even prophesies of Jesus' virgin birth...

Isaiah 7:14

14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

confirmed in New Testament below...

Matthew 1:23

23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

By the way, the Old Testament even prophesies of Jesus' virgin birth...

Isaiah 7:14

14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

confirmed in New Testament below...

Matthew 1:23

23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

Its easy to write new testament prophecies fullfilled when they were in print in the Torah for years ! Im done here ! Thx God bless and enjoy your day ! Join my new thread since you dont understand my original question

a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

LOL! You missed my answer to your original question because you're too busy either accidentally replying or purposely copying and answering your own posts! I've never seen anyone so incompetent on making posts to a thread.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: SulfurMercurySalt

LOL! You missed my answer to your original question because you're too busy either accidentally replying or purposely copying and answering your own posts! I've never seen anyone so incompetent on making posts to a thread.

Im not smart as you can tell ! Im sorry for upsetting you and the high water mark of forum navigation ! This will surely tarnish my lifes work ! So how is mary not allowed to sin and or was not the Holy spirit leading Mary as it did it with the authors who were infallible and the eastern church says mary as no infallible in free will ? “Look kids big Ben” repeat repeat repeat ! Back to you ! Are you an AI computer just getting its wings with human interaction! Im just a dope who posts like a twitching fly leg that a scorpion left after lunch !